Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The postcode is an important point. You cannot be in two postcodes at the same time and the contract only covers the F area and not the E area where Met placed your car. See there is some   advantages in with idiots.🙂 The other fact about the electric spaces is that as you are not allowed to park there, the sign is prohibitory so cannot  offer a contract anyway. and another biggie in your favour is you were not the driver and the PCN does not comply with PoFA. I had another look yesterday at the PCN and there is another error since it does not say that the driver is responsible to pay the charge during the first 28 days. Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][b] (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; so that is another nail in their coffin and it s something I would include in  your WS since that is one that every Judge would accept as a failure to comply. As far as their WS is concerned some of them leave it to the last minute to prevent Defendants being able to counteract their claims. However if they leave it too late [ie after the stipulated time] you can email yours to the Court on the last day and complain at the bottom of your WS that you have not received it and therefore you are asking the Court not to accept their WS. In your case it isn't that important since you have a virtual walkover in Court. I would be surprised if they don't concede beforehand. It is a lost cause for them. Not that I would advocate parking in their electric bay in future with a petrol driven car again.🙂
    • I think the post code 0 v O is nonsense personally and would just annoy the judge.  Cases are decided informally at small claims and judges are not interested in the weakest of trivialities. Understood re FY v EY.  So add to the Unfair PCN section that the PCN includes the wrong post code and places you at a residential area rather than the car park in question. You should wait till 7 June before filing your WS - as a Litigant-in-Person you wont't be penalised for being a day late - to see if MET's WS turns up.  It will also give you a chance to see if they have paid the hearing fee.  If it doesn't turn up you can attack them for defying court directions.  If it does turn up you can ridicule their arguments.  Win win. Also you can see if they have bottled it - which they have done with the last two cases we have here. I think the exact points of your WS have become a tad confusing - and I have heartily contributed to the confusion! - so can you please add the latest version. I think the post code 0 v O is nonsense personally and would just annoy the judge.  Cases are decided informally at small claims and judges are not interested in the weakest of trivialities. Understood re FY v EY.  So add to the Unfair PCN section that the PCN includes the wrong post code and places you at a residential area rather than the car park in question. You should wait till 7 June before filing your WS - as a Litigant-in-Person you wont't be penalised for being a day late - to see if MET's WS turns up.  It will also give you a chance to see if they have paid the hearing fee.  If it doesn't turn up you can attack them for defying court directions.  If it does turn up you can ridicule their arguments.  Win win. Also you can see if they have bottled it - which they have done with the last two cases we have here. I think the exact points of your WS have become a tad confusing - and I have heartily contributed to the confusion! - so can you please add the latest version. I think the post code 0 v O is nonsense personally and would just annoy the judge.  Cases are decided informally at small claims and judges are not interested in the weakest of trivialities. Understood re FY v EY.  So add to the Unfair PCN section that the PCN includes the wrong post code and places you at a residential area rather than the car park in question. You should wait till 7 June before filing your WS - as a Litigant-in-Person you wont't be penalised for being a day late - to see if MET's WS turns up.  It will also give you a chance to see if they have paid the hearing fee.  If it doesn't turn up you can attack them for defying court directions.  If it does turn up you can ridicule their arguments.  Win win. Also you can see if they have bottled it - which they have done with the last two cases we have here. I think the exact points of your WS have become a tad confusing - and I have heartily contributed to the confusion! - so can you please add the latest version.
    • Thank you Dave for jumping in yesterday and advising not to send off the letter I wrote. I am sorry Clou but I thought at the time that both car parks were owned by Alliance. Before doing a snotty letter does anyone in your family able to alos drive your car apart from yourself and are you the keeper?
    • Thanks for this. UPS never said they delivered to the wrong address. Tracking just showed as delivered. EBay couldn’t find it for weeks and then said they found it and it had chocolate in it. Something clearly doesn’t add up here.
    • Try to think things through logically & legally - the two go together as the civil court system in England is pretty decent and easy to get your head round. 1.  Say you & I got into legal dispute.  Who could sue who?  Well I could sue you and you could sue me.  My next-door neighbour couldn't sue you and your best mate couldn't sue me because the case would have nowt to do with them.  The same goes for a DCA.  It's not their debt.  They can do nothing. 2.  Of course a DCA can't affect your credit score.  If they could, then there would be nothing stopping you picking on someone you dislike, saying they owed you a billion pounds, and affecting their credit score.  Logically there must be more to it than some daft allegation.  CCJs are issued and credit scores wrecked after a judge has decided on the matter and the losing party has still refused to pay.  With nine grand in play the matter will not magically go away but you need to gen up and seperate daft threats from paper tigers from concrete threats which could really cause you trouble. The others are right - you need to inform the original creditor of your address in order to avoid a backdoor CCJ. Also, why did you decide not to sue UPS who have admitted to delivering to the wrong address which in turn led to the theft of your goods?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PCN in suspended bay unclear sign advise appreciated


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3107 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So we've got a another parking ticket for parking in a suspended bay code 21.

 

not arguing that at all, but on inspection of the suspension notice it's as clear as mud.

 

Basically it says:

 

Suspension of 2 parking spaces opposite school.

 

Unhelpful as it doesn't state which 2 spaces there being over 8 parking spaces.

 

Now in the past I've won an similar appeal after writing to the adjudicator but council conceded before I had to go to the appeal. It was a parking suspension notice in a disabled bay which just stated one parking space suspended in the space of 3 cars.

 

Just wondering if I should follow the same tac and say the sign is wholly unclear as to which 2 spaces are actually suspended out of the 8. My car was parked at the end of the bay in a one way street. The notice could have read as the last 2 car parking spaces suspended to make that clear. As our local council doesn't make individual bays rather one long bay to say a space is suspended opposite a school is too unclear.

 

Looking forward to your replies thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?420421-code-21-pcn-a-little-advise-please

 

Link to past thread for comparison

 

also the suspension notice was quite a few spaces away from where I was parked. Had I walked right after parking my car there's no wayI would have seen the notice. One would only see it if walking left from where I parked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I would challenge it on that basis.

 

 

Thanks for the speedy reply. I was wondering if I should include the other appeal number so they can compare it or not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I just received an NTO but no reply to my appeal. I'm unsure if I should contact the council or fill in the NTO I've checked with royal mail and my appeal was delivered on the 1st of September.

 

Any advise really appreciated as my instinct says call the council but I'm sure I've read on other threads not to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

By all means call them if you want to. What possible harm could it do? Ask them if a) they have your appeal on file, and b) whether they replied to it - and if so, could they check it was sent to the right address.

 

I think it's likely that they did get your appeal and decline it - otherwise the NTO would have been issued a few weeks ago (28 days after the PCN). If they considered your appeal and declined it, then you can ask them to reinstate the discount rate on the basis that you didn't get their reply - that's if you just want to pay it and be done.

 

But if you want to fight on, gambling the full charge, then you'll have to appeal again, in response to the NTO. It would be good to know what became of your appeal, as it may help you decide what to do next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

By all means call them if you want to. What possible harm could it do? Ask them if a) they have your appeal on file, and b) whether they replied to it - and if so, could they check it was sent to the right address.

 

I think it's likely that they did get your appeal and decline it - otherwise the NTO would have been issued a few weeks ago (28 days after the PCN). If they considered your appeal and declined it, then you can ask them to reinstate the discount rate on the basis that you didn't get their reply - that's if you just want to pay it and be done.

 

But if you want to fight on, gambling the full charge, then you'll have to appeal again, in response to the NTO. It would be good to know what became of your appeal, as it may help you decide what to do next.

 

What does one do if they say they don't have the appeal on file? I've known my council to take much more than 28 days to reply to an appeal hence I don't think they've replied at all.

 

Currently what do I tick procedural impropriety on the NTO?

 

Thanks for the replies they're much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they say they don't have it, there's nothing you can do. If they do have it but haven't made a decision, then ask them to put the case on hold and reply to it before proceeding - see what they have to say about it.

 

I don't think there is a legal obligation on them to send a reply at that informal stage, but I could be wrong. In any case, if all else fails you could try responding to the NTO on impropriety as well as whatever other appeal grounds you want, but that would mean accepting the higher charge and fighting it at that rate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I'll call them tomorrow morning not sure if they'll even speak to me as everything is going automated at my council so very hard to get to talk to an actual human being!

Link to post
Share on other sites

(2) A penalty charge notice served under regulation 9 of the General Regulations must, in addition to the matters required to be included in it under paragraph 1 of the Schedule to the General Regulations, include the following information—

 

(a)

 

that a person on whom a notice to owner is served will be entitled to make representations to the enforcement authority against the penalty charge and may appeal to an adjudicator if those representations are rejected; and

.

 

(b)

 

that, if representations against the penalty charge are received at such address as may be specified for the purpose before a notice to owner is served—

.

 

(i)

 

those representations will be considered;

.

 

(ii)

 

but that, if a notice to owner is served notwithstanding those representations, representations against the penalty charge must be made in the form and manner and at the time specified in the notice to owner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you got the reply green and mean.

 

I called up the council and it turns out I forgot to put my address on the appeal (doh!)

 

The CS assistant advised me to write in asking them to take a look at the initial appeal and see if they can bring the charge back down. Call back within a week for an update and then if they say no put in a formal appeal as I've got nothing to lose now just £130!

 

So what would you advise if they can't turn the clock back so to speak would you resend the original appeal or would you write a new one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd do what they ask. Send in an appeal consisting of a request that they review your previous letter, plus a request that, should they turn it down, they reinstate the discount because of what happened. Then, wait and see what they come back with.

 

The trouble with the advice you were given is that when you do that, you will have used up your only appeal at this stage. You won't be able to send a further 'formal' appeal - but if you have anything to add, do so now, with your letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I see so anything I wrote in now will be seen as the formal appeal, I wasn't made aware of that. I think I'm going to have to word this letter very carefully in that case.

 

Seems silly though that they couldn't find out the address details from my cars registration and contact me like that. But then again that may be asking for a bit of humanity from the council.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, your next piece of correspondence is the final thing they will consider (unless you are very lucky, and I wouldn't risk it on a double attempt!).

 

The first appeal, your informal one, could have come from anybody. They do not know where the letter came from, nor that you are also the keeper, nor do they have the keeper's details on file at that stage. So, they just have the letter to go by, and without an address they can't consider it. That's just the way the system works.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So do I need to send in the NTO at the same time? Or doesn't it matter of its not sent in. I assumed that until I sent in the NTO they wouldn't take it as the formal appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...