Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • There is a letter offering  HM Court and Tribunals Mediation by telephone Does anyone use this? Its free
    • Morning guys As Bank suggested, I've now re-worked my POC to include details of my parcel's original loss,  miraculous rediscovery a month later and subsequent delivery, albeit having been opened and the contents removed. Grateful for your thoughts please, as (P2G having gone very quiet) I intend to initiate court proceedings against P2G tomorrow - 1 May. Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing 8 second-hand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and whilst Evri collected the parcel for delivery on 18 March 24 they then ‘misplaced’ it a day later, formally declaring it lost on 27 March. On 16 April they found it and delivered it on 17 April but, at some point before delivery, it had been opened and the contents removed . The defendant refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is also in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80  
    • Odd one this, I recieved 2 notice's for the 18th and 19th April stating that I overstayed on Wigan Robin Retail Park. Permitted Minutes 180. They state I was there 355 minutes on the 18th and 388 minutes on the 19th. Both times I was there around 10 minutes getting my wife a brew from costa after dropping the kids off at school.  On both days I had passed through there a second time around 3pm, again to get a brew then left. Both notices have 2 images each, Entrance and exit.  This is the interesting bit. The Entrance images both timestamped actually clearly show I am exiting the retail park not entering it. And the exiting images they provided show me leaving the carpark after visiting a second time later in the day. In the attachments You'll see all 4 images show that I am exiting, none of them are of me entering. I understand most if not all that see this post won't know the area but if the look at the map link i gave you'll see the road I was on leading up to the main road. g24 ltd 1.pdfg24 ltd 1.pdf GoogleMap view of the road I am on in the entrance images I would have had dashcam footage but I since formatted the memory card. I tried recovery tools but I couldn't get the files back.  
    • An update: I just got another PCN. I get the feeling that someone in the residence is calling OPS, as it's dated for a few mins after I parked. I won't appeal of course. Interestingly, our cleaner was also parked but didn't get a PCN. I asked them why and apparently they're whitelisted. I did ask the MA if they could whitelist me and they said they couldn't. Clearly they decided not to tell the truth. Surely, this would resolve all of the issues entirely i.e. we'd keep non-residents from parking, whilst allowing for residents to park without issue? Also, could OPS now take me to court for both PCNs separately, or could it be one case?    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bus Lane PCN sent to an old address - now bailiffs need help with SD form please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3170 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I need an advice urgently.

 

I moved house on 3 March 2015

 

 

on 20 Aug 2015 received a Notice of enforcement from bailiffs, Equita.

 

 

According to the council the incident happened on 6 March 2015 (3days after I moved house),

on 11th Council applied for my address from DVLA and were given an old address and all the correspondence was sent to the old address.

 

Council claims that because their letters left their building they assume that I received them,

there was no sender's address at the back of their letter so that is why I think the letters could not be returned.

 

 

I know that lots of my mail was returned to the senders, for example my credit card was blocked

because my statement was sent back from an old address,

so not sure why council's mail was not returned or it is easier for them that way.

 

I spoke to Council on 21 Aug 2015 and they advised to contact TEC and ask for Statutory Declaration form and fill them in.

I managed to speak to TEC today, they sent me Late Statutory Declaration form PE2 and Statutory Declaration form PE3.

 

I would like an advise how correctly fill the forms,

I know that my main reason I have never received any correspondence,

and because the dates of moving house and incident were so close to each other,

there was a confusion with an address.

 

 

DVLA was informed with a new address, surprisingly it took very long to get my new VO5,

but I eventially received it back in April 2015.

 

But still I cannot believe that the council has followed the correct procedures,

how somone could be taken to the court without being informed.

 

 

Council claims that under data protaction act they could not check my address with council tax department,

my old address was at the same council as where the incident happened, but how come the bailiffs found me.

 

Any advises would be much appreciated

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Council claims that under data protaction act they could not check my address with council tax department, my old address was at the same council as where the incident happened, but how come the bailiffs found me.

 

Any advises would be much appreciated.

 

Every time that I see enquiries such as yours and read of the local authorities response my blood boils!!!

 

The answer as to HOW the bailiff company have located you to a new address is very simple. Unfortunately, the present position is that the regulations state that local authorities may only approach DVLA ONCE during the parking ticket life and that is within a specified number of days following the initial contravention. On the other hand, the enforcement company have no such restrictions and accordingly, as soon as they receive the warrant, a search is undertaken and a new address located.

 

It is actually not quite as simple as writing to you at the new address. What must happen is that a request has to be made to the Traffic Enforcement Centre for PERMISSION to amend the address on the warrant. Before completing the Out of Time application can you call the local authority and ask them to confirm the date on which they applied to TEC to amend the address and the date that permission was granted. From what you have said, I am not persuaded that any such request would be legal in your case but would prefer to hear back from you before commenting any further.

 

Can you also advise the local authority that you are considering making a a subject access request and would like to know whether there are any notes on your parking ticket history to indicate the date on which any correspondence had been returned by Royal Mail. This is a very important point given that Section 12 of the Taking Control of Goods National Standards states that creditors must not issue a warrant is they know that the debtor is not at the address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for reply,

I asked about if any mail were returned, LA relied no, but that is my question, how thw mail could be returned if there is no sender's address at the back of the envelop. LA sending the parking charges in the plain white envelope with no stamp with the sender's address. The only evidence they have: " The letters left the building"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I spoke to the council and they have confirmed that on the 10 Aug 2015 they applied for the warrant to change the address and on the 12th it was granted. Also they have confirmed that there was no returned mail to the council and the letter does not have the senders address at the back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"It is actually not quite as simple as writing to you at the new address. What must happen is that a request has to be made to the Traffic Enforcement Centre for PERMISSION to amend the address on the warrant. Before completing the Out of Time application can you call the local authority and ask them to confirm the date on which they applied to TEC to amend the address and the date that permission was granted. From what you have said, I am not persuaded that any such request would be legal in your case but would prefer to hear back from you before commenting any further."

 

The LA has confirmed that the permission to amend the address was requested on 10 Aug and granted on 12th.

How could I use this information for PE2 and PE3?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...