Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.    Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.   The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved.  Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
    • It was all my own work based on my previous emails to P2G which Bank has seen.
    • I was referring to #415 where you wrote "I was forced to try to sell - and couldn't." . And nearer the start in #79 .. "I couldn't sell.  I had an incredibly valuable asset. Huge equity.  But the interest accrued / the property market suffered and I couldn't find a buyer even at a level just to clear the debt." In #194 you said you'd tried to sell for four years.  The reason for these points is that a lot of the claims against for example your surveyor, solicitor, broker, the lender and now the receiver are mainly founded in a belief that they should have been able to do something but did not. Things that might seem self evident to you but not necessarily to others. Pressing these claims may well need a bit more hard evidence, rather than an appeal to common sense. Can you show evidence of similar properties, with similar freehold issues, selling readily? And solid reasons why the lender should have been able to sell when you couldn't.
    • You can use a family's address.   The only caveat is for the final hearing you'd need to be there in person   HOWEVER i'd expect them to pay if its only £200 because costs of attending will be higher than that
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

URGENT HELP!! Shared ownership eviction 9th July!!!!


Jaye05
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3216 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The HA have to have separate accounts for your rent account and court costs, and can only claim using arrears on rent. Their legal costs aren't likely to be massive.

 

£2k is quite a significant amount for 50% rent and must have taken a while to accumulate. Have you been paying anything off them?

 

Were the £15k arrears for the mortgage or rent?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The HA have to have separate accounts for your rent account and court costs, and can only claim using arrears on rent. Their legal costs aren't likely to be massive.

 

£2k is quite a significant amount for 50% rent and must have taken a while to accumulate. Have you been paying anything off them?

 

Were the £15k arrears for the mortgage or rent?

 

The legal costs are just shy of 1000. I've had some personal issues with my now ex partner which I don't want to go into on here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to get to the bottom of where this £15k comes from, as if that was advised to the court previously when the suspended possession order was granted, then it needs to be corrected if it is wrong.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm waiting for a callback from them now!! But since the suspended order it is now showing 19k in my account and all payments have been made as per the order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cannot add their charges to your arrears in a possession claim. Arrears are missed monthly payments only

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely - you should state " I wish to bring to the court's attention that I cannot reconcile the arrears total the Claimant pleads as they appear to contain late payment charges and are therefore not a true reflection of the arrears situation"

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant thank you so much, I know it's not related to the rent arrears but is the whole reason for the suspended possession order!! I've photocopied the last 2 years statements to include also

Link to post
Share on other sites

You seem terribly confused...you say the eviction notice is for rent arrears, but the documents you posted up indicate that it is the mortgagee who has issued the warrant - and that ties in with the fact you state the mortgagee holds a suspended possession order.

 

I suspect what has happened, is that the mortgagee has in fact paid your rent arrears and are now claiming possession on the basis of that payment they made, being arrears (which they are legally entitled to do in shared ownership issues such as yours), albeit the vast majority of mortgagees would pay such arrears and add them to the mortgage account.

 

You need to be a bit clearer on what your actual situation is, as I suspect it is the lack of clarity on your part that is causing those who are trying to give you advice (CAB etc) to be so confused about what is going on.

 

If the eviction was due to rent arrears, the claim would be from the housing association - you have not stated they have taken previous possession proceedings against you, therefore it is impossible for them to execute a warrant and have the bailiffs issue the eviction notice. It stands to reason, therefore, that the warrant was executed by those who do hold a suspended possession order, the mortgagee, and that it is they who are seeking to gain possession.

 

You can't apply for a stay unless you are clear on what you are asking the court to do - and to be clear you need to know who you are trying to stop...the housing association, or the mortgagee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was confused initially as when I first called the mortgage co upon receipt of rhe notice they told me they did not know that this had been issued and that the incorrect form had been sent by the solicitor and should have been for an owner/occupier and not tenant/occupier.

 

I have now found out that it is indeed the mortgage company seeking possession based on rent arrears which they have consolidated. What I am concerned about is the amount of interest and charges that have been added onto my account since the suspension in November.

 

Seems like all is lost then

Link to post
Share on other sites

The suspended order is a joint one between the mortgage and housing association. Although at the time of the hearing the solicitors failed to add the HA and had to get the order amended.

 

There is no such thing as a 'joint suspended possession order' - each party would have made their own claim for possession under their own grounds, which means that there are two suspended possession orders on the property, however, as the mortgagee has paid off your rent arrears, it is they who are executing the warrant on their SPO, not the housing association.

 

This does indeed mean that all is not lost, as the court will allow your stay IF you can afford the monthly mortgage instalment (which will be higher if they have capitalised the rent arrears) plus an amount towards the arrears. The process for applying for a stay is now as straightforward as it is for any other eviction warrant relating to mortgage arrears.

 

Your problem arises if you can't afford CMI plus a Norgan compliant amount towards the arrears. Your repeated failure to keep up with both the rent and the mortgage payments means that affordability is going to raise its head (expect the mortgage company's legal rep to state as much), and if it can be shown that you simply can't afford to make both payments, then you are scuppered and your stay application will be dismissed.

 

You need a full income and expenditure showing affordability.

 

If you're on a low income, you can claim housing benefit to help with the rent - and if you are unemployed, you could apply for statutory mortgage interest payments from the DWP...you have to have been unemployed for 13 weeks before claiming.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I attended the suspended possession hearing the solicitors wrote approximately a month after to advise they had not added the HA onto the order, the mortgagee also told me that they were both on this order so they've given me incorrect info somewhere.

 

I currently pay and extra amount agreed by the court and is it worth adding extra??

 

As per Norgan there is 22 years left and at the rate of arrears I'd be looking at an extra 57 per month. I already pay 100 and haven't missed this since the suspension order. The mortgage arrears currently stand at just over 600 and that was confirmed today so the 15k is largely made of rent arrears paid by them, charges and interest. I have asked for a full breakdown.

 

I will be stating on the N244 the above paragraph Ell-enn quoted as I do believe they have added something else in there especially as my current balance has gone up 4k despite sticking to the agreement on the mortgage side.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think you will have to evidence that you can afford the new mortgage payments including added rent arrears, plus the rent payments to the HA going forward. You could ask the court for time to work with the mortgage company to look at affordability, as you have had a lack of information from the mortgage company as to what they have been doing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes this is what I worked out with CAB have the budget sheet that they did to file with the N244.

 

My main concern is that I have the correct form as it's totally different to the ones shown on here and other websites.

 

I got it directly from the court. I will be speaking to the personal support unit based in the court before filing just to make sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes this is what I worked out with CAB have the budget sheet that they did to file with the N244.

 

My main concern is that I have the correct form as it's totally different to the ones shown on here and other websites.

 

I got it directly from the court. I will be speaking to the personal support unit based in the court before filing just to make sure.

 

I think the form is slightly different court paper copy versus online version

 

What confuses me about the situation is the amount of rent arrears that appears to have been added to the mortgage, when you have not mentioned receiving letters and statements showing this. If that has happened, I cannot believe the mortgage company have followed a legally compliant process and this may help you. Surely they had to issue you with some form of warning letter or notice, before adding the rent arrears to the mortgage account.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I attended the suspended possession hearing the solicitors wrote approximately a month after to advise they had not added the HA onto the order, the mortgagee also told me that they were both on this order so they've given me incorrect info somewhere.

 

To be fair, given your apparent confusion, it's more likely you have misunderstood than that they have given incorrect information. The fact is that the claims for possession would HAVE to be made separately, as the grounds under which each party could claim are vastly different and bear no relation to each other. It sounds as if they both made a claim and sent separate claim forms to you - look through your paperwork and check. Though at this stage it's largely immaterial as it is the mortgagee that issued the warrant (best option for you).

 

I currently pay and extra amount agreed by the court and is it worth adding extra??
The amount you pay was calculated on the basis of your previous mortgage arrears, not the money that they now seem to be claiming for (the extra from the arrears they paid). So yes, you will probably have to pay more to satisfy the court.

 

As per Norgan there is 22 years left and at the rate of arrears I'd be looking at an extra 57 per month. I already pay 100 and haven't missed this since the suspension order. The mortgage arrears currently stand at just over 600 and that was confirmed today so the 15k is largely made of rent arrears paid by them, charges and interest. I have asked for a full breakdown.
You may not have missed any mortgage payments - but did you miss rental payments? According to you, the HA also has an SPO, which means you would have been ordered to pay the rent plus an amount towards the rent arrears.

 

I will be stating on the N244 the above paragraph Ell-enn quoted as I do believe they have added something else in there especially as my current balance has gone up 4k despite sticking to the agreement on the mortgage side.
They may well have done - but you have neglected to post any figures whatsoever, so no one here can give you anything close to accurate advice.

 

 

  1. How much were your rent arrears when you were taken to court in November 2014?
  2. How much were your mortgage arrears when you were taken to court in November 2014?
  3. How much is your monthly mortgage payment?
  4. How much is your monthly/weekly rent payment?
  5. Have you consistently paid both the mortgage and the rent, and any amounts towards the arrears since Nov 2014?

Someone has mentioned the mortgage company not informing you about them paying the rent arrears - under a shared ownership contract, they don't have to tell you in advance, merely inform you afterwards that you now owe X - it is part of your contract with the mortgagee and part of your contract with the HA that the mortgagee will have the option to pay any rent arrears.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The N244 has been filed hearing on Monday. I've done all I can now and thank everyone for their guidance. I did put a request to be able to stay in the property for a reasonable time should the arrangement be refused but not even sure this is an option

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just home from court!! Suspended again at the same rate as previously plus some towards rent arrears!! The HA didn't even send a representative. Now I can get in and claim all those ridiculous charges back which will bring down the outstanding balance significantly!!

 

Thanks for all your help again (I didn't require help in terms of figures just filling the form in which is why I didn't post them up)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's great news, you must be relieved. Make sure you keep up the payments - make payment a few days before the due date if possible. If you miss a payment they will apply to evict again.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both!!! Now the ex is never coming back to abuse me both mentally and financially I will be able to do this!!!! And I will definitely be going to the FOS over Acendens extortionate charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done. :)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...