Jump to content


Removal of Implied Right of Access and FMoTL: Debtor loses court case against Bailiffs (Thornton v Rossendales Ltd)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3240 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

link not working for me

 

is it re piles? :lol:

 

The link is to my own website and accordingly, the link is changed by the Consumer Action computer system because links are not allowed. Even though I do not always agree with the principle, rules are rules. The PDF is available and I will get a copy posted shortly.

 

Can I please make clear that the PDF is NOT to a copy of the judgment (which would be very brief indeed) but instead, is an overview of the claim and the outcome of the hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, I suspect it was posted on the internet with link that we would not have posted on the forum. CAG's guardian angel then converts the links into something weird :lol:

 

Apologies .. I will remove the link to prevent further confusion.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sheila, that was what I found on the internet.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I notice that this thread has been picked up by the online news service; SCOOP. Hopefully, this will assist solicitors and anyone else who may have been having problems locating details of the case.

 

 

 

http://www.scoop.it/t/lacef-news

 

The SCOOP page that carries a copy of this thread is exhibiting a brass plaque. That plague is a Removal of Implied Right of Access. If only these daft people knew where these notices originated from they would have second thoughts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In 2013 I started a further thread (see below) concerning a debtor by the name of Mr Thornton who had taken legal proceedings against a firm of bailiffs called Rossendales Ltd after one their bailiff ignored the Removal of Implied Right of Access notice that he had sent to the company by recorded delivery.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?406801-Notice-of-Removal-of-Implied-Right-of-Access......debtor-loses-in-court-and-ordered-to-pay-bailiff-companies-legal-costs(3-Viewing)-nbsp

 

Despite being subjected to abusive comments from internet trolls, that particular thread has so far been viewed over 32,000 times and is evidence of the huge public interest in these daft notices.

 

The astonishing number of viewers (32,000) is clearly due to the fact that when entering the words Removal of Implied Right of Access into a google search the above page is the very first one (even above all the Freeman on the Land/Sovereign Citizen websites) !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The astonishing number of viewers (32,000) is clearly due to the fact that when entering the words Removal of Implied Right of Access into a google search the above page is the very first one (even above all the Freeman on the Land/Sovereign Citizen websites) !!!

 

People should be aware that some of the FMOTL advocates are making a career out of it and therefore ROIROA is important to them. There must be a tendancy to protect the accuracy of some of the information they publish and they will no doubt offer an explanation as to why they still believe in the actions they still promote.

 

But of course BA knows this and this thread is an opportunity to publish information on this subject. Perhaps CAB and National Debtline can add a note about this issue on their sites.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are these "Professional Mckenzies Friends" the sort who demand fee's upfront?

 

Because I would love to see the look on a Judge's face should one take a former client they dropped in the brown stuff over the Implied Right notice to court for a CCJ!!!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are these "Professional Mckenzies Friends" the sort who demand fee's upfront?

 

Because I would love to see the look on a Judge's face should one take a former client they dropped in the brown stuff over the Implied Right notice to court for a CCJ!!!

 

This will again be addressed in the correct thread which may be put up later today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did post up a PDF a while ago that covered this question. The relevant authorities are going to conduct an enquiry this year I believe on this very subject. Also you may want to read up on reserved legal activities and legal activity, or read the PDF attached...

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread has been picked up by SCOOP and is supposed to deal with the Removal of Implied Right of Access notices.

 

Another thread will be started regarding the court case yesterday and all references to it and references to McKenzie Friends etc should be reserved for that thread only. Hopefully the moderators will remove all posts unconnected with the title of this thread once the new thread is available and post them in the right place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What effect has the new regs made to this notice in anyway? Or the named Court case?

 

The common law sited( trespass etc.) is of course unaffected. There are provisions in schedule 12 which replace those lost in the council tax regs.(14/15, 66).Bailiffs are now called enforcement agents, that's about it.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...