Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3221 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

various companies take differing stances, some more helpful than others

 

all will require a full I&E sheet, and will mark your cra files accordingly

 

read the link above, to see how they should behave, dont offer any more than you can easily afford

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi again, just to update

- I have now received agreement from the bank to extend the mortgage for another year, on a capital and interest repayment.

 

 

I am now in the process of writing to the credit card companies to ask that the accounts be frozen, interest stopped and a reduced payment accepted,

as I will be unable to meet all the minimum payments as well as the mortgage payment.

 

 

From re-reading through the posts, I see that I should also ask for my original agreement with the card companies.

 

 

May I ask the purpose of this?

As everything was done on line,

I do not think I have any agreements that have been actually signed,

so do not understand the necessity (I am sure once answered this question will become abundantly clear,

but I am an old duffer who doesn't quite understand it all).

 

 

At least the mortgage is safe :) and I will be able to sleep again.

 

 

I will post again when I have the replies from the credit card companies.

 

 

Many thanks to all for their help so far.

 

 

Regards Oldman

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to see that things are starting to come together for you. Well done for getting this far without a nervous breakdown :razz:

 

For any cards that were taken out pre April 2007 lots of companies didn't keep the paperwork so they would not be able to enforce any debts through the courts if a debtor decided to stop paying. Also, some contracts were never signed or they supply just an application form which didn't contain all the necessary information, rendering them unenforceable. I would use this method where a creditor is being obstructive.

 

There is also a possible route to reducing these debts if charges have been added. Credit card charges can be reclaimed as well as loan charges. these charges are levied for late payments or going over the limit. The same applies to Mortgage charges although this is more tricky. Overdrafts are nigh on impossible

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Silverfox, that has explained it very well.

 

 

I will check on when the cards were first taken out, although I am fairly sure they were post-2007.

 

 

What I propose to do is incorporate a CCA request within the letters to the card companies asking for reduced payments,

sort of kill two birds with one stone, just in case the agreements are unenforceable.

 

 

Do you think this would be ok?

 

 

Can I also just check that the postal orders for £1 for the CCA should not be filled in?

 

 

I think I read that somewhere on here but would like clarification if possible.

 

 

Many thanks again, Oldman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is different opinions on the filling in of payee details. I do as I make sure the payee is correct. Other leave it blank for the creditor to fill in. Either way you choose to do it, write on the reverse of the cheque/postal order, "Statutory Fee Only." If you incorporate the cheque/PO number in the letters and state there as well the stat purpose, that helps keep track of the PO details.

 

If you can, send all letters signed for as some companies will say they never got the letter, even if they did. If signed for is not affordable, get a free proof of postage from the Post Office.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA request is better sent separate.

however, if the credit is still with the original lender , then that could be somewhat pointless

certainly if its after 2007.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi again.

 

 

Update to my situation as follows

 

 

- send three letters off requesting CCA's and offering a lower payment as I cannot afford the minimum repayments.

 

 

Received a reply from Capital One agreeing to this, and enclosing my original Credit Card Application which was July 2007.

 

 

The other two (Barclaycard and MBNA) have not replied to my letter at all.

 

 

Not sure what to do next regarding the latter two - do I just carry on paying the small amount I have offered and wait and see, or do I stop paying altogether?

 

 

The mortgage has been sorted and has now been extended for a year, and converted to a capital and interest repayment so I will finish that next July.

 

 

Any ideas as to my next move regarding Barclaycard and MBNA?

 

 

Ironically, MBNA contacted me regarding my card as they thought there was something wrong and said they were sending me a new card

with a new number to make sure it had not been used by someone else.

This failed to arrive at all, but have not heard a word more from them.

 

 

Not sure what to do about that.

 

 

Looking forward to any further help I can receive.

 

 

Regards Oldman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cap1 application form you say not the agreement?

 

 

did they send the correct T&C's too..[date 2007 with you name on it?]

 

 

you can continue making your GOGW payments if you like or scan things up?

 

 

on the other two, if you wanted you could stop

as they've failed? the 12+2 working days deadline?

sar to MBNA might be useful to see what went on?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dx will check what they sent tomorrow and update. May I ask what GOGW stands for? I assume it's something to do with the lower payments? Will scan up the information from Cap1 as well tomorrow. Many thanks, Oldman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it should have turned into a link..

gesture of good will.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again

 

If you can post up the 'agreement' cap1 sent you (minus all personal info and barcodes/ref no's) then we can assist in tha validity of it although if it is after April 2007 this may be a moot point (the rules changed then).

 

With the other two, as they have failed to supply, the account is in dispute and they should be told as much. Have you checked to see if the Postal Orders have been cashed? (Post Office can help there)

 

If you are not that bothered about your credit file being royally screwed, you could stop all payments until they comply with your request.

 

I would be inclined to make as much of a payment to ensure no default is placed and file a formal complaint to the banks.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...