Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
    • Frankly I think you should go to a hearing unless you feel especially nervous . If you have any worries then you should follow our link to find out about a county court familiarisation visit     You shouldn't forget that county Court judgements are very helpful but they are not binding. They are only persuasive.  It is difficult to see you losing but it might be better to be there in order to counter any arguments from the other side
    • OK - I have rejected mediation and said I wish to proceed to a court hearing. I said 'Yes' to : Do you consider that this claim is suitable for determination without a hearing, i.e. by a judge reading and considering the case papers, witness statements and other documents filed by the parties, making a decision, and giving a note of reasons for that decision? since they appear to be relying solely on my failure to purchase their additional 'parcel protection coverage/insurance' which my submission of the PENCHEV and SMIRNOVS transcripts should kick firmly into touch.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Job Offer and old CCJ's


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3291 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

I am looking for advice

 

I have been offered a job Currently unemployed

 

Its a great job and one i really wanted , with a top Company

 

Now ive recieved the offer , i have to complete a pre employment screening

 

Its screened by a Company called hireright UK

 

It seems to be a CRB check - Which is fine and Credit check

 

I have a couple of CCJs from 3/4 years ago which i am paying , and are nearly done

 

£500 left on one £400 left on another

 

Any advice on how you think this will effect my postion , its not in Bank its an IT company

 

After 3 interviews and presentation , to fail here would be gutter .

 

Anyone been in a similar situation

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

I am looking for advice

 

I have been offered a job Currently unemployed

 

Its a great job and one i really wanted , with a top Company

 

Now ive recived the offer , i have to complete a pre employment screening

 

Its screened by a Company called hireright UK

 

It seems to be a CRB check - Which is fine and Credit check

 

I have a couple of CCJs from 3/4 years ago which i am paying , and are nearly done

 

£500 left on one £400 left on another

 

Any advice on how you think this will effect my postion , its not in Bank its an IT company

 

After 3 interviews and presentation , to fail here would be gutter .

 

Anyone been in a similar situation

 

Many thanks

 

Did you disclose the CCJ's ? (And were you asked?)

 

It may have been better to pre-empt them finding out (they can find them on Trust Online) by telling them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not asked untill now i am at the pre employment screen stage Its not carried by the employer its by a 3rd party callled hireright , the form asked for your persnal details and performs CRB ( no Problem ) Credit Check ( Problem ) and feeds the info back to the employer if that makes Sense

Link to post
Share on other sites

Consider calling your contact at the prospective employer.

 

"I got into problems 4 years ago and got CCJ's.

I've turned my life around, and am happy to show you I've been paying them regularly to clear them.

This new job will help me get them satisfied even sooner"

 

Would that look better to a prospective employer than "CCJ's showing" coming back on a Trust Online report as an out of the blue surprise to the employer?

 

You can't stop them finding them : you can try to manage their response to how / when they find out....

Link to post
Share on other sites

agreed . seems to the way to go , - I have a feeling they will tell me where to go , and looking at this job contract on my desk and the money that secure mine and kids lifestyle , is nearly tipping me over the edge so close but so far - its not even a bank , i could understand if it was a bank , used to work for one , - but it seems every decent job these days reqiures a credit check , i know what ill be spending the next few years sorting out

Link to post
Share on other sites

Often you are asked first about debt problems and a criminal record.

 

Now, they often ask if you have EVER had a CCJ, now as far as I know I don't believe there is a way for such companies to check anything further back than 6 years, if the CCJ was older than 6 years I'd keep schtum, to all intents and purposes it has gone, clearly though if its not 6 years old its best to mention it first, get a credit report first.

 

Same applies to criminal record, you can get a copy of this from Police, it was recently discussed on here.

 

Not..In my last job, they turned down a guy due to a CCJ, but later changed their mind and invited him back as generally he was a good candidate,.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ccjs are in the six years 4 years ago , The Pre screening is done by a 3rd Party Hireright , checkinh noodle the ccjs dont show , checking equifax they dont show , check experian they show, i would which one they will use :) gutted i have a CRB check is clean

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will be interested in knowing if you have any financial difficulties which would be make you more likely to dip your hand in the till than others so it is down to statistics. I just hope you get the opportunity to explain and this may mean bypassing the 3rd party company if possible to sell yourself in a better light

Thes companies exist as they have access to bulk lists of the credit reference agencies so make it quicker and cheaper than doing it in house. However, they do tend to be inflexible as they work to a particular brief rather than looking for exceptions so good candidates can get passed over in favour of those who just tick all of the boxes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My take is this.

They have not asked previously so they are probably not concerned with minor or historical stuff. They are probably more concerned with the level of debt. I am a mortgage broker and when I last changed jobs had some unsatisfied defaults (long story). As they asked on the application I declared them, they also ran a credit search. They were still prepared to take me on as they were historical and my level of debt was minimal.

 

If they feel you are good enough they may want a bit more of an explanation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell them first. If you aren't responsible for money in the job I doubt it will be a problem, esp with a clean CRB check. Your honesty may even go in your favour. Do it ASAP so you can stop worrying - and get in with the info first.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks do they use all of the CR agenices do you know , its a gutter as the job is nothing to with its an It manager job.

 

I work in IT too and I find it annoying, unnessacary and rather obtrusive to have to do these kind of checks when I can see no need for them, I don't deal with money or finance. But at the end of the day, you MUST tell anything they shows in Credit Reports (I assume all 3) and anything that shows on Police Check, Id keep schtum about anything else though unless specifically asked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I work in IT too and I find it annoying, unnessacary and rather obtrusive to have to do these kind of checks when I can see no need for them, I don't deal with money or finance. But at the end of the day, you MUST tell anything they shows in Credit Reports (I assume all 3) and anything that shows on Police Check, Id keep schtum about anything else though unless specifically asked.

 

 

Thanks

 

Ive completed the form with the 3rd Party Screening company and I have a current clean CRB and refs will be fine , just the Poor Credit History , Which as you say n IT , is a shame , as its nothing to Do with my job , I will be gutted if i get turned down

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let us know how you get on.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

Ive completed the form with the 3rd Party Screening company and I have a current clean CRB and refs will be fine , just the Poor Credit History , Which as you say n IT , is a shame , as its nothing to Do with my job , I will be gutted if i get turned down

 

Have you pre-emptied them receiving the report by telling your contact at the firm?

If not, why not? Are you hoping they won't check for CCJ's?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not hoping they wont check - i understand they will do the required checks

 

As i have explained above , the screening is done , by a 3rd party not by the employer , they have little intrest in the HR process

 

The contract offer says besides a few normal things like CRB Check that you must have a

 

" A Satisfactory credit reference"

 

So it will come to down what satisfactory means i would guess ,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed..in some circumstances they wont care about a few CCJ's, in others they want someone who is spotlessly clean.

 

They want tlo avoid someone with debt problems because clearly that person is gonna be nicking pens all day long :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed..in some circumstances they wont care about a few CCJ's, in others they want someone who is spotlessly clean.

 

They want tlo avoid someone with debt problems because clearly that person is gonna be nicking pens all day long :)

 

Spoke to a nice lady in HR , Who said it has flagged up a couple of CCjs totaling just over 1k

 

And if i wished to put something in writing for them to consider it

 

Ive done that and sent a copy of my CR with a clean couple of years , from my current address so back to the waiting game :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoke to a nice lady in HR , Who said it has flagged up a couple of CCjs totaling just over 1k

 

And if i wished to put something in writing for them to consider it

 

Ive done that and sent a copy of my CR with a clean couple of years , from my current address so back to the waiting game :)

 

Well, you'll have to wait & see.

I still think you'd have been better to tell them before they saw it on the report (it makes you seem less of a risk, since you are seen to be "honest & open" about it), but that was only advice, and you chose not to take it.

 

If you get the job, great. If you don't we'll never know if you would never have got it, or might have if you'd told them about the CCJ's before they found out through the credit report.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...