Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Mortimer claimform - old RBS Credit Card 'debt' - Time for some help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3277 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

I have been lurking on these excellent forums for a while now (wow do I wish I'd found them sooner!) but now it's time to ask for some help on behalf of the wife who has received a claim form.

 

Name of the Claimant: Cabot Financial

 

Date of issue: 05 May 2015

 

What is the claim for:

 

 

By an agreement between ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND (RBS) & the Defendant on or around 14/04/2005 ('the Agreement')

RBS agreed to issue the Defendant with a credit card upon the terms and conditions set out therein.

In breach of the Agreement the Defendant failed to make the minimum payments due & the Agreement was terminated.

The Agreement was assigned to the Claimant.

THE CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS 650.

 

What is the value of the claim? £770

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Credit card

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Before

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt Purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Unknown about NoA

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Unknown

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Not that we can remember

 

Why did you cease payments? Redundancy and financial difficulties

 

What was the date of your last payment? Unknown as was in a DMP for a while around 2011

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Not yet

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes - CAP around 2011

 

Would I be right in thinking the first steps would be to acknowledge the claim on MCOL, CCA Cabot and CPR to Mortimer Clarke?

There are 2 kinds of people in the world; Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes acknowledge the claim via MCOL and send the CPR 31.14 letter to Mortimer Clarke by standard recorded delivery asking for, copy of original CCA, copy of default notice, copies of statements of account from the date of any default, copies of any statements showing the last payment received by creditors and a copy of the termination notice.

 

Not sure I would send the CCA to Cabot, if Mortimer Clarke are representing them. Mortimer Clarke would have to get hold of the documents.

 

Then see what comes back. It is unlikely you will get the documents back by the time of having to complete the defence, so you would enter a defence that a CPR 31.14 letter had been sent and could not enter a full defence until the documents requested had been supplied by the creditors Solicitors. But come back for more advice on this when you have to put in your defence.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks UB - can I just double check when we would need to file a defence by?

There are 2 kinds of people in the world; Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks UB - can I just double check when we would need to file a defence by?

 

See this thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had read that, but it seemed at odds (33 days) with the paperwork (28 days) ... Was just checking I wasn't missing something as usual :lol:

There are 2 kinds of people in the world; Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had read that, but it seemed at odds (33 days) with the paperwork (28 days) ... Was just checking I wasn't missing something as usual :lol:

 

They allow 5 days for the claim form to arrive with the debtor, which is the diff between 28 and 33 ! Sometimes there is a delay between the claim form issue date and the claim form hitting your doormat.

 

Given that the credit card was only taken out in 2005, they may be able to supply all of the documents and then you would have to think about what to do. Unless you spot some error, then it will end up with a CCJ if not paid in full within 30 days of judgement. You can then ask to pay monthly based on affordability.

 

It may be worth discussing this with National Debtline. If you think there is only a slim chance of being able to defend and are not worried by a CCJ, then you might think about accepting it and asking to come to a payment arrangement. In this situation I think it is probably best to consider options, rather than just thinking you will defend and then up in a months time not being able to and having to come to a payment arrangement anyway. I say this, as you have not mentioned anything which would be a real defence and may be clutching at straws thinking the documents or lack of, will come to your rescue.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please understand that we are not, nor are we trying to be "debt avoiders" and have successfully negotiated repayments with creditors where applicable. I originally posted here to try and assist my wife in dealing with, what is for her, a fairly stressful situation and having read other threads on here believed that this was the correct course of action, especially as we believe there is PPI and other (as I understand it) unlawful charges on the account.

 

However given that it appears my original post has caused either offence or misunderstanding, I ask the admin to delete this thread accordingly and I apologise for the inconvenience.

There are 2 kinds of people in the world; Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA request goes to the Claimant...not Solicitor......alchamist your post has not caused offence or any misunderstanding...Uncle Bulg is merely pointing out your options.

 

No one is judged on CAG for the actions or reasons for defending a claim....it is your right to defend.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, apologies, but it seemed that it was a "take the CCJ" type post, which I put down to be my misunderstanding due to lack of sleep from a 7 week old.

 

Is it worth defending then, or do we just accept liability?

There are 2 kinds of people in the world; Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Link to post
Share on other sites

Always defend a DCA claim...they are merely after a default Judgment.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I thought originally - hence my post. Thanks Andy

 

Not looking to cause any offence. Just probing whether you have reasons for defending that stand a chance and to consider the options. You cannot know whether people who post on CAG are capable of dealing with these matters and seeing it through to the end. Hence why I suggested contacting National Debtline to discuss this further, so you were aware of your options. We see so much advice being given on CAG without updates, that you wonder what has happened. Some people may benefit from talking with someone from a debt helpline, so they fully understand their situation.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks UB. Fully intend (with the help of CAG!) to see this through and update as required on here.

There are 2 kinds of people in the world; Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks UB. Fully intend (with the help of CAG!) to see this through and update as required on here.

 

Just make sure that if you have issues with PPI etc, that you have this fully documented to evidence if this gets to court. If you don't have copies of letters about this, then you should register written complaints with RBS and follow it through.

 

Unfortunately, you do read cases on here where people have entered in their defence issues about PPI/excess charges, but when it is probed what they have done about it, the response is nothing. So just make sure you have this covered off.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...