Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
    • I am extremely apprehensive about burning our files.... I do not know why, so it is becoming an endless feedback loop. Scared to pull the trigger to speak in the desire not to mess up my file. 
    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

welcome allege son made payment


theshuffler
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3328 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I meant i had advised him to sell it a while back ,

after mortage and living expenses he is left with about 85 quid a month ,

 

 

In my view thats not living its surviving.

 

 

He is young and fears the worst

 

 

i would just like to ease the worry on him ,

getting one up on Welcome would of made him smile .

 

 

I doubt that he would be selling his house within the 12 years now ,

he has stuck it out this long , and hopefully in a year or so s time he can switch his mortage to a lower rate .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 197
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Just because unWelcome are applying for a Charging Order does not necessarily mean they will get it. He should make a formal offer to pay back a nominal sum through Welcomes N.I. Solicitors bearing in mind what he has available. Had they sought to enforce the CCJ this is all the EJO would have expected. Has he been to CAB or his local MP. I have used both and found them to be excellent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He has 8 creditors and has just posted letters to them all including welcome offering £10 a month until his situation improves , given that he only has £85 a month left , he cant offer any more than that , and im sure the courts would agree

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Welcome as i expected did not respond to my sons offer of ten pounds a month ,

 

 

he has received a date to attend court on the 17th for his appeal against the charging order ,

 

 

any good letters or pointers he can use around?

 

 

I read here somewhere that you can ask to have terms attached to terms to the charging order if it is to be granted ,

 

 

not sure how this is done either,

 

 

he isnt a great speaker and i will not be in the country to help him out .

 

 

As usual any input , advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a good look ODC and have arranged bullet points but it looks messy and not very articulate . I have read a few interesting posts where solicitors ave slipped up on procedures and had their cases thrown out , Im assuming that this appeal hearing is only to see if Wel**** can go ahead and apply for the order and that it wont be decided on tues. Most of the below apply to him .

  • Where you have a number of debts, whether making a charging order in favour of one creditor would give them unfair priority over other unsecured creditors. It is particularly useful if you can show you already have a payment arrangement in place with your other creditors. This would be affected by a different arrangement being made.
  • Whether there are any other creditors who might object to the order being made. The charging order nisi should be sent to all your other creditors. If they have not been informed of the hearing you can ask for the application to be dismissed or at least adjourned to allow creditors to be notified and make an objection if they wish.
  • If the debt is small you can argue it would be unfair to make a charging order on your home if it is worth a lot in comparison. This is based on a case called Robinson v Bailey. ( £4,100 owed )
  • Whether the creditor could have given you a secured loan when you first took out the loan. If they decided to give you an unsecured loan instead, this could be particularly relevant if you have other unsecured creditors who may be disadvantaged by a charging order being made.
  • Whether there are other ways the court could enforce payment of the debt. You could ask the court to make an instalment order or an attachment of earnings order so that the instalments would come directly from your wages. This only applies if you are employed and your employment would not be at risk.
  • .
  • If your home is not worth as much as your mortgage (also known as "negative equity") then you can argue it is not worth a charging order being made as the creditor would not be paid off even if they forced your home to be sold.

You should point out any particular hardship which your family would suffer if a charging order was to lead to the sale of the home. This is particularly important if the debt is not in joint names, as it is not then your partner’s debt

Link to post
Share on other sites

This might be a saviour here if i can figure out the right way to handle it .

 

 

Have just got my hands on the loan agreement . I hope this is the pure gold i have been looking for .

 

 

On the agreement the box says

"This is a credit agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 sign it only if you want to be legally bound by its terms "

Below is a series of 6 boxes . I wish to purchase

1 personal accident plan

2 lifecare 24

3 homecare 24

4 other

5 other

6 PPI

 

 

of the boxes are ticked ,

 

 

below that again is another signature box

" I understand that i am purchasing the product (s) ticked above ( nothing ticked ) on credit provided by you

and the terms relating to the credit for the product can be found above and overleaf in this agreement.

Now this is what im hoping is the saviour here .

My sons signature is in the wrong box ,

he has signed the box for extra products ( there are no boxes ticked , so he has signed for nothing

)and not put his signature on the bit that says credit agreement .

Also the terms and conditions are on a seperate page .

I thought that they had to be on one side or the other of the original agreement ?

But is that irrelevant as he hasnt signed the agreement in the proper box

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers ODC

i dont think they have an enforceable agreement and just noticed there is no agreement number on the document either

pretty shabby for an 08 credit agreement .

 

 

Not sure what if anything i can do with this info

 

 

seeing has a ccj has already been issued .

 

 

The hearing on tues is appeal against charging order ,

i cant see how i can slip an unenforceable agreement ( if im right ) into the argument .

 

 

Thinking along the lines of asking for an adjournment then challenging the ccj.

 

 

Any ideas ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there anyway i can dispute a ccj from welcome granted 26 8 09 ,

 

 

my son didnt attend the court but we now want to get the case into court,

 

 

problem is there is a charging order hearing appeal on tues .

 

 

I know there is a 21 day period to get a setaside but this is long gone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi the shuffler

 

ive been asked to drop in as car finance is my ball game

 

interested in this agreement

 

need to get moving as you have a court hearing, ime working to have it adjorned,

 

me thinks a set asside of the ccj is in order knowing welcome like i do

 

please post the agreement onto your thread asap

google photobucket to post

use the upload link for message boards with out thumbnails option to post

 

 

did you get a default notice

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no way of copying this , unless i try a photograph .

 

 

The case is my sons and children being children he done the old ostrich thing , binned letters etc .

 

 

Will try to do photograph of the bits im talking about ,

 

 

shouldnt there be a ref number on the agreement to associate it with the account?

 

 

there is a box for it but its blank ,

 

 

will get camera now and see what i can get posted up.

 

 

Also terms and conditions on seperate sheet.

 

 

This wasnt a car loan but appreciate you dropping by.

 

 

Get back to you shortly

Link to post
Share on other sites

He maintains that he had no prior notice of the court date , and the ccj was granted with 8% interest .

 

 

I have the court papers here ,

he didnt defend ,

on tues he is up to appeal against them applying for a charging order.

I had drafted this up to see how things went .

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

I respectfully request that the appeal hearing listed for today be adjourned to a date in the future.

It is my intention to challenge Welcome Finance through this court on the debt for which the original court order was granted.

 

As I have previously stated I received no notice of court proceedings against me and subsequently was denied the opportunity to defend myself.

 

 

I will be requesting all documentation relating to this case from Welcome Finance,

as required by law they have 40 days to comply with my request.

 

 

Upon receipt of the documentation I will begin to prepare a case for a set aside of the judgement.

I believe that I have a strong case and can successfully argue this in a court of law with the required documentation.

If you cannot see your way to adjourning the case I ask that you take the following into account when you are making a decision today.

 

 

I have also attached a breakdown of my finances for your perusal

1 The loan was offered on an unsecured basis at APR @ 48.98% Annual interest rate 44.25%

why wasn’t I offered a secured loan at a much lower rate than above.

 

 

Welcome Finance secured a county judgement at 8%

if I were to pay that over 24 months the interest on the original loan would be £206

the unsecured rate totals £1,188 in interest.

 

 

Can you honestly agree that Welcome Finance had my interests at heart

when they offered me an unsecured loan over a secured one?

Now a secured loan via a charging order seems more appealing to them.

 

2 The debt contains penalty charges which have been deemed unfair. Hence the amount requested in the CJJ does not reflect the true debt .

 

3 My home is jointly owned by my wife and I whereas the debt is in my name

 

4 We have three children in the household the eldest of whom is eight the youngest being two

 

5 I had no contact with the CEO since the court case and have not been given the opportunity to make an offer of any payments through the court.

 

6 An offer was posted to Welcome but they failed to acknowledge my letter

 

7 The debt that Welcome are trying to recover is less than £5000

 

8 There is negative equity on my home, the granting of a charging order will not guarantee payment.

 

I trust that you will consider all these factors when you are making your decision

and sincerely hope that my arguments are not out of line with the courts thinking on these matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What operating system are you using?

VISTA mate have tried everything i know to get it . I think the pics show what i mean , the top box says sign here if you agree to the terms and conditions the second one states that you understand that you are purchasing the products ticked above on credit referring to ppi etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...