Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well done.   Please let us know how it goes or come back with any questions. HB
    • Incorrect as the debt will have been legally assigned to the DCA and they are therefore now the legal creditor. Read up on debt assignment.   Andy
    • Thanks Man in the Middle and everyone it's greatly appreciated form was filled in online yesterday now just have to wait and see
    • Hi,    I'm almost done. One question is should I include a header with " Claimant's Trial Documents" or something similar and include a copy of my WX from the trial since that has the claim form defence and documents that were relied upon at trial so that the judge can see that? or should I assume they will already have those documents on the file and so simply include a short statement of case to show the case I intend to prove at the appeal should permission be granted. Since I've made a shorter concise statement of case setting out what I intend to prove at an appeal hearing I'm thinking maybe removing the header of "Documents/Exhibits for use for Permission to Appeal   " since the permission to appeal focuses on the grounds of law and so I'm thinking of just having   Appellant's documents Statement Of Case Skeleton Argument    Then a seperate category named Trial Documents Claim Form Defence Claimant's Witness statement Exhibibts to Claimant's trial witness statement   I'm wondering you think would be better, only because I don't reference a single exhibit in my appeal statement of case since I am just explaining the undeveloped points of law around why the judge is wrong since the  statement only focuses on permission, not the outcome of the appeal so there is no reference to any exhibits?   Or should I just remove exhibits and not add trial documents or exhibits on the understanding the judge will already have the trial documents and that if permission is granted I then include them in my appeal bundle.   Thanks   N/B My statement of case doesn't have the claim form or defence or any witness staements in. it is simply a short 4 page document setting out the claim history and the points I intend to prove at the final appeal hearing should permission be granted.
    • Tory MPs didn't expect a July GE - and now they're furious. Tory MPs didn’t expect a July general election – and now they are rightly furious | Henry Hill | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Sunak’s party has plunged into a short campaign without a plan, says Henry Hill, the deputy editor of ConservativeHome  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GE selling mortgages to another company


jacqui_o
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3324 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The information is from my own experience.

For many months there were charges added to my account whilst the DWP were contributing to my payments. During this time GE money were levying charges to the account. I had been paying these charges for the time they were applied. After reading about charges and making a phone call to the accounts department, it was told to me the charges would cease whilst the DWP were making payments and as long as this was being paid by them & as per guidlines from FSA. Despite many many months of fees added up to this point. No further charges would be applied. No mention of a refund however till January 2014, incidently about the time they were taking me to court for £835.00 of allegged arrears & some months after these were applied. They offered me £480.00 and then £600.00 as a gesture of good will. Again, no mention of the interest they accrued on this, just the amounts of £40.00 admin fee's.

I must add, the amounts offered were not accurate either as there was an issue about time limitation of 6 years yet on one letter dates stated came up short by two dates. Their letter dated 17/01/14 that refers to a refund of £650.18 show the date of 03/02/08 inclusive and compare to Alis** Ca**idy first offer of £480.00 & how they come up short by 2 dates 03/12/07 03/01/08 & how the figures differ by £170.00 Note there was no interest mentioned in any of the refunds.

If calculated as compound interest over 7 years at 8% the figure repayable would be £1251.40 which far exceeded the alleged amount owed to them as of 20/08/2013.

At the time I declined their offers simply because I was told that if I accept I must not talk about the offer to anyone. Also, if I accepted. I would be saying that they are not obliged to pay out but did so and that would be the end of any further claim of any sort. Effectively a gagging clause!

Edited by PesteredbyGEmoney
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

We are currently paying £83 towards these fees and charges........no choice if we don't they deduct it from the cmi and that's how the arrears accrued ........

 

Thus far over the past 4 years we ahve paid £3,500 towards them. they cliam this will make sure they finish with the mortgage...... (another story misold)

 

We are being charged £135 interest plus £35 additional interest per month..... odd thing in 11 years the amount we owe has not reduced!!!

 

They have offered to take £1905 off the fees and charges balance but not pay it to us!!! obviously going to refuse......as its nto accurate...

 

I wrote to them in may pointing out that between the dwp and out payment made between the 03/05/2014 and the 30/05/2014 the cmi due ont he 02/06/2014 is fully paid so the payment made by the dwp on the 2nd will be carried forward....... they hae refused and stated it has been deducted from the arrears.........there is a court agreement for those and it is being met......

 

Not knowing enough about it but feel they cannot do this with dwp payments.........

 

I ahve given them my charges figure and told them payment within 14 days or court action..... guess we knwo what it will be lol.......:mad2::mad2::mad2::mad2::mad2:

If you kick a Tiger in the Ass youbetter have a plan to deal with its teeth :madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...