Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later the your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. So if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place and park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and then unload the children followed by reloading the children getting seat belts on etc before driving to the exit stopping for cars, pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
    • Hi  no nothing yet. Hope it stays that way 😬
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dads Natwest reclaiming


Ftgab19
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3336 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all again,

Been awhile since I've been on here, hospitals don't have the best of wifi's.

I sent Natwest a SAR for my dad so we can have a look at doing his package account.

They sent back a letter not long after asking what information he wanted.

I'll upload the letter so everyone can see

I'm not sure what to post back.

I used the SAR from the library.

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

seems like they simply want sigs that are not photocopied or scanned over.

 

 

in the reply pointout you wish all data they hold on you

 

 

but with specific focus on XX account

but NOT limited to this sole account.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, well now that is a new stalling tactic.

 

 

Dear Nat West,

 

Your Letter Reference : 12345678

My Subject Access Request Dated : -

 

I am in receipt of your letter dated 31st March 2015, in response to my DSAR request dated DATE.

 

I do not understand your response. My Subject Access Request was indeed very specific, I require all data in connection with the account(s) I have/have held with you.

 

I would therefore appreciate you fulfilling your obligations in providing me with ALL data as requested and within the time frame laid down by the regulator.

 

Yours etc.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx,

 

It's a bit rich that coming from the bank that for years has sent my dad letters with the sign printed...

 

Will this be ok to send?

 

Private and Confidential

Subject Access Request Team

Ground Floor

Business House B

PO Box 1000

Edinburgh

EH12 1HQ

 

 

Date: 13/04/2015

 

Account number: 00000000

 

SAR Ref: 000000000

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

We are in receipt of your letter dated 31st March 2015 concerning the above account. To answer your question, we wish for you to supply us with copies of all the data which you hold on us in relation to any matter and in any form and for any period of time.

 

Please note that this Subject Access Request requires specific focus on the account number mentioned above but is NOT limited to that sole account. We have signed and enclosed your letter of authorisation.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

Dad & Mum names Printed

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need to put "private and confidential" – why on earth would you need it?.

 

The rest of your letter is perfectly correct – but you should add that their request is completely irregular. A subject access request is clearly a request that all personal data – and the 40 day counter is already running and that you will lodge a complaint if they breach their duty in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bankfodder,

 

I copied and pasted there address and forgot to take it out. I've updated the letter, please let me know if I should change anything else.

 

Letter:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

We are in receipt of your letter dated 31st March 2015 concerning the above account. We are at a loss to your irregular request. A Subject Access Request is a request for all personal data, you do not need a breakdown.

 

We wish for you to supply us with copies of all the data which you hold on us in relation to any matter and in any form and for any period of time.

 

This Subject Access Request requires specific focus on the account number mentioned above but is NOT limited to that sole account. We have signed and enclosed your letter of authorisation.

 

Please note that the 40 day timescale started when you received our Subject Access Request on the 17th March 2015. If you fail or breach your duty in anyway, we will lodge a formal complaint against you.

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx,

 

It's a bit rich that coming from the bank that for years has sent my dad letters with the sign printed...

 

Will this be ok to send?

 

Private and Confidential

Subject Access Request Team

Ground Floor

Business House B

PO Box 1000

Edinburgh

EH12 1HQ

 

 

Date: 13/04/2015

 

Account number: 00000000

 

SAR Ref: 000000000

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

We are in receipt of your letter dated 31st March 2015 concerning the above account. To answer your question, we wish for you to supply us with copies of all the data which you hold on us in relation to any matter and in any form and for any period of time.

 

Please note that this Subject Access Request requires specific focus on the account number mentioned above but is NOT limited to that sole account. We have signed and enclosed your letter of authorisation.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

Dad & Mum names Printed

 

Thanks

Andrew

 

Does not surprise me with this bank, I am still receiving info from my original request in Aug 2014 :roll::-o

 

As advised, request all data that is held under the said name giving them 40 days to respond with details from the date of your submission.

 

Good Luck as you will need it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bankfodder,

 

I copied and pasted there address and forgot to take it out. I've updated the letter, please let me know if I should change anything else.

 

Letter:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

We are in receipt of your letter dated 31st March 2015 concerning the above account. We are at a loss to your irregular request. A Subject Access Request is a request for all personal data, you do not need a breakdown.

 

We wish for you to supply us with copies of all the data which you hold on us in relation to any matter and in any form and for any period of time.

 

This Subject Access Request requires specific focus on the account number mentioned above but is NOT limited to that sole account. We have signed and enclosed your letter of authorisation.

 

Please note that the 40 day timescale started when you received our Subject Access Request on the 17th March 2015. If you fail or breach your duty in anyway, we will lodge a formal complaint against you.

 

Thanks

Andrew

 

Should do the trick :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Subject Access Request is not a request for all personal data unless you specifically request that.

 

 

If you didn't request this in your initial letter then Natwest are correct to put your request on hold until you inform them of what personal data you actually want.

 

 

They are also correct to require a wet signature in order to verify your dad's identity and ensure that nobody else gets their hands on his personal data

(when Natwest send your dad letters with scanned signatures they do so because it's more personal, not so that your dad can verify their identity).

The 40 days won't start until you confirm these two things - they are just complying with the Data Protection Act - neither of these are stalling tactics.

 

In order to speed up the process why not just do as asked in their most recent letter: sign and return the signature form and then phone the SAR team to explain what information you want.

 

Also what is the point in stating you want all personal data and stating you want specific focus on a particular account

but at the same time you also want them to look at all other accounts. It's contradictory and doesn't really make sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Id be mighty peeved if someone could get money out of my account by producing a photocopy of my signature. It needs to be original in order to prove its the correct person asking for the required info.

 

As said above, you don't need to confirm the banks id so therefore they don't need an original signature.

 

Some peoples thought processes absolutely amaze me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd inc a ctax bill copy or something too

next they'll ask for ID

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all again,

 

My dad got a letter from natwest a few days ago, i'll upload the letter so everyone can see. I'm not sure what to respond with.

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Ms Allan.

 

 

I have now written to you on more than one occasion requesting the data I am entitled too under an SAR

 

 

I am finding the continued obstruction by you and your bank rather annoying.

 

 

To make things perfectly clear, I want all the data, within the request, that you hold .

 

 

I have no wish whatsoever to limit this to a 'set of date limited statements'.

 

 

The SAR dictates I am entitled to my dat and numerous other banks have complied without question.

 

 

I hereby give you 14 days from the date of this letter to comply

or I will be complaining to the ICO and/or latterly instigating court proceedings should you fail.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

add - failing which you will consider that it is a deliberate breach of their statutory duty.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi xd,

 

I'm not to sure were I should add that comment in, this is what I've got so far. Also does my mum & dad need to sign this letter?

 

Letter:

 

Account number: 00000000

 

SAR Ref: 000000000

 

 

Dear Ms Allan

 

We have now written to you on more than one occasion requesting the data we are entitled to under a Subject Access Request.

 

We are finding the continued obstruction by you and your bank rather annoying.

To make things perfectly clear, we want all the data, within the request, that you hold.

 

 

Any further failure will be viewed as a deliberate breach by NATWEST of their statutory duty under the Act.

 

We have no wish whatsoever to limit this to a 'set of date limited statements'.

The Subject Access Request dictates we are entitled to our data and numerous other banks have complied without question.

 

We hereby give you 14 days from the date of this letter to comply or we will be complaining to the ICO and/or latterly instigating court proceedings should you fail.

 

 

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

 

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Id be mighty peeved if someone could get money out of my account by producing a photocopy of my signature. It needs to be original in order to prove its the correct person asking for the required info.

 

As said above, you don't need to confirm the banks id so therefore they don't need an original signature.

 

Some peoples thought processes absolutely amaze me.

 

 

I'd agree with you if the SAR was asking for the information to be sent to a different address. But the SAR is asking the bank to send it to the address on file. So the bank thinking it's a [problem] doesn't make sense to me.

 

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi xd,

 

I'm not to sure were I should add that comment in, this is what I've got so far. Also does my mum & dad need to sign this letter?

 

Letter:

 

Account number: 00000000

 

SAR Ref: 000000000

 

 

Dear Ms Allan

 

We have now written to you on more than one occasion requesting the data we are entitled to under a Subject Access Request.

 

We are finding the continued obstruction by you and your bank rather annoying.

To make things perfectly clear, we want all the data, within the request, that you hold.

 

 

Any further failure will be viewed as a deliberate breach by NATWEST of their statutory duty under the Act.

 

We have no wish whatsoever to limit this to a 'set of date limited statements'.

The Subject Access Request dictates we are entitled to our data and numerous other banks have complied without question.

 

We hereby give you 14 days from the date of this letter to comply or we will be complaining to the ICO and/or latterly instigating court proceedings should you fail.

 

 

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

 

 

Thanks

Andrew

 

 

adjusted

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, a request for 'all' data as is defined. no need for someone to specify. the cag template has some indicators, but is for them to send 'all' data. if thats what you asked for.

if they dont know what that means!

if they havent complied within the stat period, then they are already in breach.

what did yr initial request say?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your request was pretty explicit in that you required ALL data ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Dads Natwest reclaiming
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...