Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no DCA is a bailiff end of neither do they have any legal powers whatsoever. i would write to everyone simply giving your current abroad address , inc proof of residency. that will stop all threats going to anywhere else.  
    • Thanks for your prompt reply. I have some questions, please: When you say nothing will happen, my 80 year-old mother is worried about potential DCA doorsteppers if/when the debts are sold on - she is a very sweet, quite vulnerable lady and she is worried she may be bullied and harrassed.  If they do come knocking, what should she say?  I told her to say she knows nothing about any of it and they have no right to come knocking on her door and to warn them police will be informed if they come back.  Problem is, I don't think she would be strong enough and can easily be bullied into saying more than she intended once the door has been answered. Next questions: 1)  Should I inform all my lenders that I have moved abroad before defaulting (to avoid the quirky English law loophole thingy that could end up in a CCJ or worse once a DCA gets hold of it)?  2)  Can/should I provide an alternative UK correspondence address to my lenders instead of my mother's home address e.g. my virtual office address for my business - would the lenders accept this as I live abroad now and don't live at my mother's address?  Can I just write and tell them, without any further ado and not get into any further questions about it and cease further correspondence with them and default?  And would this stop DCAs coming to my mother's house as it would not be my current residential address on the lenders files when passed to the DCA?  Do they doorstep previous addresses? 3)  If I don't provide a UK correspondence address will I be at risk of not being aware of any Letters of Claim etc and legal proceedings notices etc not reaching me (there's no reliable postal system in the developing country I've moved to).  Worried this would mean I could end up being taken to court without being aware of it and could end up in a worse situation. 2) What exactly will go on my credit file once I've defaulted, assuming no legal action is taken against me?    4) Should I contact any of my lenders and inform them I have zero assets.  TSB & Sainsburys already have I&E info from me which shows my income  @ £1200/mth is below the combined total of my debt repayments @ £1300/mth and that my income only just covers essential costs of living @ £1200/mth.  Could it be useful to be on my file that I have no assets, so that the DCA clearly see this when the debt is passed to them? Thanks again for any advice.
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • paypal, but i would like to know if anyone knows if there is a certain time limit they have to refund you? thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

laid off after 27years unfair dismissal


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3292 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

my friend has worked for the same firm for 27 years and was getting bullied for the last couple

he went to see the owner and told him various times that he could not work with the person involved

 

 

it came to a head last week and he told the boss on the Wednesday he couldnt carry on

the boss told him to go home and think about it as as far as he was concerned it was all in my friends head

and if he wanted to fetch someone in he would discuss it further.

he worked that day and

 

 

on Thursday decided to go home after turning up for work and think about things,

 

 

that night his boss put a letter through his door terminating his employment stating that he was no longer doing his job properly and he was finished.

 

 

He went to see the boss on the Fri morning and the boss wouldn't see him

 

 

is this unfair dismissal

 

 

he was also told he wasn't entitled to anything either.

 

 

do you think he has a claim for unfair dismissal

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI there

 

From the information you have discribed there may be scope for wrongful dismissal as well as maybe unlawful dismissal.

 

Contact ACAS and see what they say.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not turning up for work, or speaking in terms that may be considered a resignation are rarely a good idea.

 

However, from the limited information available, there certainly appears to be scope for your friend to take this further. As above, a call to ACAS may be a good idea, as would a free initial consultation with a solicitor specialising in employment law.

 

Any chance your friend might consider registering and posting himself - it is always easier than dealing with a third party.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The end of the post sounds like you are saying he turned up for work and then just went home. Unless hr had proof to back up his accusations of bullying, he may just been seen as trouble maker and then walking off the job may be classed as gross misconduct depending on the type of job.

 

As said before though, if your friend could post up, we might be able to offer more advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

he went to see a no win no fee solicitor as he isnt in a union they told him to write to his ex employer and state the fact that he thinks he was unfairly dismissed and send reg post he followed the advice and received a letter from the employers stating a tribunal will take place next tues at the office with the owners dad (who used to run the firm) and the owner he is allowed to take someone in but they need to know who he is taken and they are not allowed to ask questions or speak to the panel the dad will then decide if he has been unfairly dismissed or not if he dose not go they say that means he has accepted that he is in the wrong and thats the end of the case. he can postpone the hearing if he wishes.

 

I cant believe that they think this is legal what are peoples thoughts

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should answer the question about whether he just walked off the job!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

erm this does not sound right. The employer does not invite the claimant to a tribunal

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as i said the day before he was told to go home and think about it he didnt but the next day ehen he went in and found nothing had changed he decided to go as the boss had told him the day before to do it and he hadnt even if he had walked off and returned home the boss should have contacted to see why he before shoving a letter though his door that night dismissing him remember its a small family firm and he had been there 26 years no verbal warnings no writing warnings nothing just dismissed

Link to post
Share on other sites

walking off the job is simply not on and weakens any case he has.

 

I suspect the boss means they are having a hearing, not a tribunal, and is using the language cackhandedly. The employer is now covering their butt in case it does go to tribunal.

 

Has he actually put a claim in yet? Clock's ticking,looks like it has been 2 months and he only has 3. Did the lawyer offer to take the case on?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I would let him be guided by the lawyer now; they will have all the details. Safer than us advising second hand?

 

Very interested to know how he gets on though!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...