Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no that is not a defence. because you don't have a photo
    • I purchased the vehicle using finance through motonovo under a HP 60 months agreement. I have now amended the document ensuring all is in black. Unfortunately, this email has now been sent. However, I have not sent a letter to big motoring world. Also, I have taken the section of the firealarm issue. I am struggling to convert to PDF. I am not tech savy at all. My mistake was that the the salesman was very fussy on a sale. We went down a quiet road for a little test drive and not for a lengthy road test. The water issue was not present at this moment of time. However, it only became prevalent after driving away, after all docs signed. I did stated to Audi I wanted a diagnostic report. However, they carried out an Audicam which is footage of the issue. Audi have diagnosed the issue as a common issue where coupes/cabriolets accumulate water in the seals. However, I did state beforehand for no issue to be rectified due to me wanting to reject the vehicle. I am awaiting a report from Audi through email from the branch manager in relation to the issue. The issue so far is the water still being present in the sills. Audi tried to fix the issue however the problem is still prevalent. Regards 
    • First begging letter received from Overdales   ;Blah blah blah, our client's are going to win this blah blah blah we supplied all your documents under CPR   PS you can stop all this by paying £1200 less in a lump sum
    • Right,  so the court hasn't send out the Directions Questionnaires/N180s yet. PE's one is a false one, meant to intimidate you into thinking your defence was rubbish and they are confident with their claim. This is par for the course.  The PPCs do this regularly. However, PE have gone further and written that "a copy has also been filed with the court" which is a lie as the court haven't even sent out the papers yet. Keep a screenshot of MCOL, later on in your WS you can draw attention to their lying and abuse of court procedure. If you've got time on your hands, then complain to the BPA about one of their members lying.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Sent a section 21 notice to vacate because i refuse to pay estate agent fees


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3365 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi im new here so i apoligies if this is in the rong section.

 

Please some one give me some advice.

 

I am privately renting a property. When i first moved in it was me my partner and my son. Due to some difficult circumstances me and my partner have seperated. I informed the estate agent it will just be me and my son living at the property. They called the landlord and he had no problem with this.

 

 

Now the estate agent want to do a brand new tenancy agreement with new fees. Now im happy to pay fees for a new tenancy agreement However they have said they need to re-refernce check me of a charge of £150, and also re reference check my guarantor of a fee of £100. Now when i first moved in i already payed for these checks and dont they still stand ? nothings changed apart from my partner moving out so why should my guarantor have to be re checked when he was liable for full rent anyway?

 

 

So they have sent me a section 21 notice to vacate in 2 months saying the landlord wants me out. However the landlord has said its fine they just want me out because i refuse to pay for checks ive already payed for?. In the section 21 it has also said i need to pay for proffesional carpet and curtain cleaning and show them invoices for this . There says nothing of the sort in my tenancy agreement just that it should all be the same as the pictures in the inventory.

 

 

Now i have 2 months to either pay which i dont see why i should pay for something ive already payed for a year ago. Or be made to move?. Also my deposit is in a deposit scheme so if i find another private rental how does it work with my deposit being transferd?

 

 

Sorry for such a long thread just need some advice? are the estate agent allowed to do this? when the landlord is happy for me to remain in the property with my son?.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are in contact with the landlord, maybe suggest that you pay rent directly?

 

it does seem unfair that the estate agent is charging you again, probably only doing so to make themselves a few extra pounds.

 

someone with more knowledge will be along to help you out soon!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for replying. Landlord doesnt want anything to do with it. He just wants me to continue paying the estate agents. But he is happy for meto stay. Estate agent refuse to even give me the landlords number or email as they want everything to go through them so they can charge what they want. Please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your G will have to sign new Deed of G due to new AST and his increased liability from loss of chase-able joint T.

Otherwise final decision is with LL, he may think you are refusing to pay fees because you cannot afford them and hence poss future rent.

You can contact LL at the 'address for serving Notices' in your AST.

You know his name, so try searching online free BT phonebook or social media.

LA is reqd to provide LL address within 3 weeks of T's written application to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't quite clear what level of contact you have with the landlord.

 

You do not have to leave at the end of the Section 21 notice.

 

If you stay beyond the period then they have to get a possession order to get you to leave.

 

You could choose to stay and continue to pay the rent. This would call the agent's bluff. They may be wary of asking the landlord to evict you.

 

If you stay for long enough then maybe the Labour government will have got through its planned law to ban letting agent fees (a great idea because they are a massive [problem]).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey I dont have any contact with the landlord the agent doesnt allow it as they want it to all go through them so they can charge extra fees. My landlord said it was fine for me to remain in the property ( the agent told me ) so im sure he probably doesnt even know about the notice . Also in regards to the proffesional carpet cleaning at end of tenancy it didn't aay anything about that in the tenancy agreement and they want invoices for it otherwise thell deduct from my depsoit. Im sure they cant do this. To be fair the carpet is the thinnest cheapeast oldest carpet possible aswell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

carry on and try and contact LL direct; keep paying rent etc.

I cant see LL taking action to evict if he is happy for you to stay and you keep paying rent on time. why would he, it will cost him to evict and find new tenant.

LL must agree to s21 notice, LA cant act on their own. ( they are his agent, they do not own property ).

Ask agent to confirm LL agreement to S21.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LL/LA can propose any deductions from deposit based on move in/out condition report, T can contest via ADR or SCC on 'reasonableness'.

It could be 'prof clean' is stated part of LA/T Agreement applicable to all their Ts, does not have to be in AST. Equally LA's cannot deduct it from T deposit, unless otherwise previously stated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the interests of balance to the advice given above.

 

*IF* one does not leave at the end of a section 21 notice and eviction goes ahead, it is possible for the Tennant to be charged the legal fees for the eviction.

 

That being said, maybe it would be possible to negotiate your own tenancy direct with the LL on the basis that the LL would not have to pay the LAs fees himself either :)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

raydetinu

 

LL must agree to s21 notice, LA cant act on their own. ( they are his agent, they do not own property ).

Ask agent to confirm LL agreement to S21.

 

I don't think this is quite the whole story. Many landlords will ask agents to act on their behalf on all aspects of the property management including evictions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did say they cant act on their own, they must have LL agreement to try and evict somebody; LA cannot do that! only a LL as it is his property.

OK they can issue a S21 but cant follow it up and take tenant to court, only LL can do that!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...