Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Wright Hassal claimform - Halifax Credit Card 'debt'


MJC1973
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3296 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have argued that the claimant did not serve demands for payment in writing in a competent manner.

 

I never received a Notice of Assignment to Cabot from the original creditor, Halifax.

 

 

Further more, when I received a letter from Cabot,

I wrote (in May 2013) to them with a section 78 request (CCA), enclosing £10

 

 

and stated that as far as Cabot were concerned I had no knowledge of any debt that was outstanding to them,

which would not be subject to the Statute of Limitations Act 1980

(the original agreement having been taken out with Halifax pre 2007).

 

Furthermore, despite asking Cabot to supply the original creditor’s statements of account,

showing when the last payment was made and when the account technically went into default (according to the accounts terms and conditions)

I received no direct response.

 

 

Finally, I have been making nominal payments as a token of goodwill & acknowledgment of the debt.

This was done upon the advice and guidance of the Consumer Credit Counselling Service.

I notified Cabot of this and caveated the correspondence that unless they heard otherwise

would assume that this arrangement was to the creditor’s satisfaction.

 

Wright Hassal have now issued court proceedings

 

 

only yesterday I received two letters in the same envelope,

one stating they would look to have my defence struck and proceed with the court case

and the second offering me a 10% discount to settle by the 28th March 2015.

 

Am I on a hiding to nothing and should I just get on with negotiating a better discount?

I presume that Cabot would not have paid more than 20 p in the pound?

Link to post
Share on other sites

could you please fill in the following as fully as possible, it will give us the details to help you

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**%281-Viewing%29-nbsp

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you mean you sent a CCA request off with a £1 Blank PO? not £10??to cabot?

£10's - thats for an sar and does not guarantee nor 'force' cabot to produce a CCA...

and they'll use the spare £9 as payment!

 

lastly if you have been paying via CCCS and those payments are within 6yrs of the date of the claim it cant be SB'd.

 

you need to fill the link out

 

and show us your filed defence please.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

below my defence (for what it's worth).

 

 

Attached is the answers to your questionnaire and other relevant documents.

 

"The defendant maintains that the claimant did not serve demands

for payment in writing in a competent manner.

 

The defendant never received a Notice of Assignment to Cabot from the original creditor, Halifax.

 

 

Further more, when the defendant received a letter from Cabot, they wrote (in May 2013) to them

with a section 78 request (CCA), enclosing £10 and stated that as far as Cabot were concerned they had no knowledge of any debt that was outstanding to them,

which would not be subject to the Statute of Limitations Act 1980

(the original agreement having been taken out with Halifax pre 2007).

 

Furthermore, despite asking Cabot to supply the original creditor’s statements of account, showing when the last payment was made

and when the account technically went into default (according to the accounts terms and conditions)

the defendant received no direct response.

 

 

Finally, the defendant has been making nominal payments (of between £1-2 p.c.m) as a token of goodwill & acknowledgment of the debt.

This was done upon the advice and guidance of the Consumer Credit Counselling Service.

 

The defendant notified Cabot of this and caveated the correspondence that unless they heard otherwise

would assume that this arrangement was to the creditor’s satisfaction.

 

 

They also sent out on an annual basis notice of their financial statement

and in fact the next one would be due on the 1st April 2015

and be served, by recorded delivery to all creditors."

Edited by MJC1973
reduced size of document
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have edited your post to reduce the size of one of your documents.. at 46.3mb it was taking a while to download :)

 

I have also just noticed that you have left your personal details on documents.. name, address, account number, password for acknowledging claim etc.. can you please edit and repost !!

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Summary appears to be that you were in a repayment plan for £1-£2.00 per month based on advice from CCCS. But Cabot have still issued a claim.

 

Do you own your home? If so, then they are probably looking to take this to charging order stage where they will attempt to secure the debt on your property.

 

Your defence does not look to be CPR compliant.. eg.. responding to the claim . I will try and find someone who can help further.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you please copy and paste the text of your Q&A doc into a msg box here

 

you don't need to worry about the other attachment we don't need to see those docs

 

have cabot ever sent you the CCA back?

 

is it enforceable?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabot have never sent a CCA back to me no,

so I don't know if its enforceable.

I do know that the original agreement was made in 2004.

 

Name of claimant: Cabot

 

Date of issue: 22nd January 2015

Particulars of claim:

 

The Claimant’s claim is for debts arising from the Consumer Credit Act 1974 agreements.

The Claimant is an Assignee of the following debts,

notice of the assignment having been given to the defendant in writing.

Halifax Credit Card. Account no.

Despite demands for payment, the above sums remain due.

The Claimant therefore claims the sum of 3,462.75

interest under s.69 County Courts Act 1984 and costs.

 

Value of claim: 3,462.75

Has Claimant included section 69? : Yes

The claim is for a credit card

The original agreement was entered into before 2007

The claim has been assigned and the Debt purchaser Cabot has issued the claim

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?

I maintain that the Claimant did not serve Notice of Assignment in writing in a competent manner

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?

 

I maintain that the original creditor did not serve Default Notice in writing in a competent manner

as I continue to this day to pay a nominal monthly sum to their original bank account

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year?

No,

the only correspondence I have received from Cabot Financial was on the 12th February 2015

– a statement of account and notice of arrears.

The statement actually showed the monthly payments I have been making for the period it covers (1/8/2014-31/1/2015).

This is the only statement I have ever received from the Claimant to the best of my knowledge (see answers above)

Why did you cease payments?

I did not.

After seeking advice from CCCS I wrote to the original creditor and explained that I was (and remain so) financial difficulty.

I offered to make nominal payments of between £1-2 pcm which they accepted and I continue to make.

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? - No

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?

Yes, as per last but one answer.

The original creditor even agreed to freeze interest on the account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it looks like you might have been following a wee bit of freeman of the land twaddle

I'd forget that now if I was you.

 

 

so lets get you upto speed.

 

 

have you sent cabot a CCA request since you got the claimform?

 

 

if not do so now - CCA request

[£1 BLANK PO do not sign anything.]

 

 

have you sent wright hassle a CPR 31:14 request?

 

 

- if not do so now [top green library tab, legal section]

 

 

so to date all they have done since your defence filing is willy wave

 

 

there's been no dates for anything that's been set yet?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it looks like you might have been following a wee bit of freeman of the land twaddle

I'd forget that now if I was you.

 

 

so lets get you upto speed.

 

 

have you sent cabot a CCA request since you got the claimform?

 

 

if not do so now - CCA request

[£1 BLANK PO do not sign anything.]

 

 

have you sent wright hassle a CPR 31:14 request?

 

 

- if not do so now [top green library tab, legal section]

 

 

so to date all they have done since your defence filing is willy wave

 

 

there's been no dates for anything that's been set yet?

 

 

dx

 

Shall send the CCA & CPR 31:14 request today.

 

Wrt dates, I received a notice from Northampton County Court that it is now a defended claim and I must complete & return the Form N180 (Small Claims Directions Questionnaire) by the 2nd April '15

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok good several threads here with example WS's here and in the successes forum.

 

 

I'd let the CCA run for now.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

So request for CCA was sent in and Cabot write back saying "as you're at a different address we need to check that it's really you before we can comply" - ironic seeing they'll happily issue court proceedings at the new address!

 

The court then said that if they couldn't come up with proof of their claim i.e. CCA etc. then they would summarily dismiss it. Bang on the date the court would dismiss their claim Wright Hassall put in for an application for extension of 60 days "to allow the claimant time to obtain the necessary documents to evidence its claim"

 

This seems nuts - why start a claim if they haven't got the documents to evidence? If they didn't have them at the start or since, why will they suddenly appear in the next 60 days (from the hearing on the 18th June).

 

I want to write to the court and object - can I and is their a cute way of saying it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

all these claims are always speculative claims

hoping for a non contested rubberstamped default judgement.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

" Bang on the date the court would dismiss their claim Wright Hassall put in for an application for extension of 60 days "to allow the claimant time to obtain the necessary documents to evidence its claim "

 

Have you received an Order from court confirming this application....? it should allow you to set a side or vary?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So request for CCA was sent in and Cabot write back saying "as you're at a different address we need to check that it's really you before we can comply" - ironic seeing they'll happily issue court proceedings at the new address!

 

The court then said that if they couldn't come up with proof of their claim i.e. CCA etc. then they would summarily dismiss it. Bang on the date the court would dismiss their claim Wright Hassall put in for an application for extension of 60 days "to allow the claimant time to obtain the necessary documents to evidence its claim"

 

This seems nuts - why start a claim if they haven't got the documents to evidence? If they didn't have them at the start or since, why will they suddenly appear in the next 60 days (from the hearing on the 18th June).

 

I want to write to the court and object - can I and is their a cute way of saying it?

 

I assume they've just made an application and that there's not Order yet?

 

Have you received a notice of hearing yey?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...