Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Me and lots of old debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1334 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

But if, as I suspect, I come into some money in the near future surely they could say that I should pay them more.

 

And if I did get a job, then surely they could legitimately say that I should pay them more.

 

If I was bequeathed something, as my mate did who was bequeathed a racehorse, then couldn't they say I should sell that to fund the debts?

 

There are so many questions. I won't speculate about what I may, or may not be lucky enough to benefit from, but it's a potential and for sentimental reasons I would not wish to be forced into losing something!

There is a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries.

On such a full sea are we now afloat, and we must take the current when it serves,

Or lose our ventures.

 

:tea::tea:One the other hand......Sod this, I'm off!:tea::tea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 247
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I know like me you are 'old school' shall we say..pay what I rightly owe...

 

 

however most of these debts you have probably paid several times over in interest etc already

and you probably got PENALTY [late/letter/return dd] etc ] fees levied too.and PPI to reclaim

if push came to shove too.

 

just remember debt in this country is CIVIL not CRIMINAL

and DCA's are NOT BAILIFFS they have NO SUCH POWERS.

 

no-one not even a judge can force you to sell anything to repay a civil debt.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also bear in mind, whether they know where you are or not. They *WILL* more than likely apply for a CCJ using your last known address if you do not update them.

 

Without getting the paper work you WILL get a CCJ against you by default. As you failed to update your address getting it set aside at a later date will be difficult OR impossible.

 

That then means they have at least another 6 years to reclaim the money and then using the CCJ they can then move to enforcement.

 

Please consider the impact of burying your head in the sand. *IF* any claim forms arrive, we have people here that can help you. Getting those CCAs off and looking for reclaimables with SARS gives you the TOOLS to fight back..

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

Thanks for that. My gut feeling is to tell them where I live and deal with the letters as they arrive.

 

I do want the monkey off my back though, and my feeling about telling them not to call & why is still there.

 

I do not want the courts involved at all, so I'll send letters off today advising them of my new address.

 

The matter may very well be resolved this year anyway. :-(

There is a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries.

On such a full sea are we now afloat, and we must take the current when it serves,

Or lose our ventures.

 

:tea::tea:One the other hand......Sod this, I'm off!:tea::tea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a quick look over your list.

Any credit cards before 2007 might be unenforceable if they lack a original agreement.

Now unenforceability does not equal debt write off but does mean all they can do is write to you.

 

The CCA requests for credit card and loans may give you a clue.

 

With your letters to them.

Ensure you start with no debt is recognised to you or your company.

Just to protect the Statute Barred clock.

 

In regards to the sad situation at home with your wife.

I am sorry for what you are going through.

It must be tough.

Dealing with the debt and your wifes illness.

 

Please make sure you look after yourself so you can look after her. If it feels too much please talk too your GP if you are not already doing so.

 

Few things of note.

Unless you receive a county court claim form dealing with the deforestation is done on your time scale!

 

None of your creditors are going to know if you come into money.

Nor do you have to declare it to them.

Only to a court IF they get a CCJ.

Even then you have 28 fays to pay it and it will not get registered.

 

I Hope this helps

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sabresheep,

 

Thanks for for your concern, but my wife & I are no longer together. To elaborate, I am single now & have been since Oct 2009. I'm just living with the financial penalty of it. Not all cancer's victims have it!

 

I have been paying the debts, at various levels since my chat with, (and I/E forms from), the CAB so I am not sure I can say the debts are either unrecognized or unenforceable. My understanding may be 'off' though.

 

The letters will go out today & I will head the text as you suggest. I know I will get plenty of mail as a result, but at least it's all above board then. Perhaps, since I have never missed a payment to them, they have not pursued me since I've been moving around.

 

So, I propose to:

1. Tell them where I am, to keep them 'informed' and minimise the risk of a CCJ.

2. Tell them why I am where I am, (sole, live-in carer for my Mother who has Alzheimer's and is therefore a 'Vulnerable Person as defined by the Mental Health Act 2007).

3. Tell them that the only contact is to be by letter, because of the above.

4. Make them respond to the CCA requests, to define exactly who is responsible for the debts are if they are enforceable.

 

Your thoughts are greatly appreciated.

 

Incidentally, If I did manage to get a reasonably well paid job, do I have to tell them?

 

Thanks in advance

There is a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries.

On such a full sea are we now afloat, and we must take the current when it serves,

Or lose our ventures.

 

:tea::tea:One the other hand......Sod this, I'm off!:tea::tea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok if you are still paying them you do have a point there. Thats the problem with me reading things when I just wake up lol.

 

As for job issue, again, no, but a court can demand that if it went to court.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning then!

 

I have attached the letter I propose to send them advising my new address. Your comments would be appreciated.

 

Dear Sir,

 

Since I last contacted you, advising you that I had lost my job, I have been staying with family and friends in order to maintain a ‘roof over my head’. I am writing to you now to advise you of my current address.

 

Please take note, however, that the reason I am at this address is to be a live-in carer for my mother who has advancing Alzheimer’s. She is defined as a Vulnerable Person under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Mental Health Act 2007 and therefore must not be caused concern, upset or distress.

 

Clearly telephone calls to the home number would cause great confusion and distress. You are therefore given notice that you, or your representatives are not to call the home number at any time or for any reason. Should you do so, this will be construed as a deliberate attempt to cause upset and distress to a vulnerable person and suitable remedies will be sought and pursued with vigour.

 

It therefore follows that any and all communication with me shall be in writing and I am perfectly prepared to respond to you this way. However, please be advised that my mother, in not understanding what the letters are about, may very well dispose of them as she has done with others in the past. You are hereby advised that while you may have posted a letter to me, there is a distinct and real possibility that I may not get it. Therefore be advised that, for the sake of expediency, all correspondence should be by email. That way you will know that I have received your communication, and my mother cannot dispose of it.

 

There is an implied licence under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me at my home without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc, (Armstrong v Sheppard & Short Ltd [1959] 2 QB 384. Per Lord Evershed MR).

Please take note that I revoke said licence under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my home.

Should you do so, this will be deemed a deliberate attempt to cause distress and upset to a vulnerable person. Further, you will be liable for damages for a tort of trespass. In both circumstances action will be taken, and in the case of causing distress and upset to my mother, will be pursued most strongly.

 

Please be assured of my best intentions, and note that I look forward to receiving your acknowledgement in due course.

There is a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries.

On such a full sea are we now afloat, and we must take the current when it serves,

Or lose our ventures.

 

:tea::tea:One the other hand......Sod this, I'm off!:tea::tea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might want to add "And remove the phone number from your records. The phone is owned by xxx and I am not authorized to answer or use it."

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you,

 

At least I know now that I have no overstated my point.

 

It is a shame that the solicitor I have used before is now retired. She was known to be quite direct and forthright with those that crossed her professional path!

 

Anyway, the letters will go out tomorrow am.

 

Do you think that if I do get a job, I should re-instate the original agreed payments, or just leave things as they are?

 

Thanks again

 

H

There is a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries.

On such a full sea are we now afloat, and we must take the current when it serves,

Or lose our ventures.

 

:tea::tea:One the other hand......Sod this, I'm off!:tea::tea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think DX suggests what you should do in #20 and #22 :)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you mean stop paying them entirely?

 

If they suspec ted that I'd landed a job, and I'm looking still, then they'd be in court for the money asap is my guess.

There is a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries.

On such a full sea are we now afloat, and we must take the current when it serves,

Or lose our ventures.

 

:tea::tea:One the other hand......Sod this, I'm off!:tea::tea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I certainly plan to CCA all of them in the days & weeks that follow, the better to define exactly who holds what cards.

 

Then if I do realize a bequest, then I will know exactly what to offer who.

 

I may be nearly 62, but I'm by no means old and I really REALLY want this monkey off my back!

 

Too much and too many things to do to have the legacy of my past generosity haunt me for much longer!

There is a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries.

On such a full sea are we now afloat, and we must take the current when it serves,

Or lose our ventures.

 

:tea::tea:One the other hand......Sod this, I'm off!:tea::tea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

you offer nothing to no one if they fail the CCA request

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK! Thank you

 

H

There is a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries.

On such a full sea are we now afloat, and we must take the current when it serves,

Or lose our ventures.

 

:tea::tea:One the other hand......Sod this, I'm off!:tea::tea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

you offer nothing to no one if they fail the CCA request

 

Hamdryad apologies for using your thread but I have a question ref dx point.

 

DX

 

If the DCA fail the CCA but then pass the debt back to the original loan or CC compaby and they produce a CCA what is the likeliehood of them producing a CCJ if I stopped payments?

 

Thank you to both

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Carl,

 

My guess, and it's just a guess, is that they would try to insist on your liability for the debt and in the event you continued to withhold payment, they could justifiably pursue court action.

 

Personally, I had a payment plan, as laid out by the CAB, and was paying that right up until I lost my job. I told them of the circumstances and put the payments down to a much reduced figure. I'm still looking for a job, and I'm hopeful, so I may reinstate the payments, thereby demonstrating good faith. They then cannot realistically pursue legal action.

 

I had kept all the letters etc, but I have the detailed record of all my payment via the bank.

 

Incidentally, the CAB advised me to get another bank account which was disconnected from any of my other accounts. Good advice, I though!

 

H

There is a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries.

On such a full sea are we now afloat, and we must take the current when it serves,

Or lose our ventures.

 

:tea::tea:One the other hand......Sod this, I'm off!:tea::tea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you H,

 

My situation is one that I have been paying a moderate amount to many (10) Loan and credit card companies

under an arrangement since about 2008 now.

 

 

Had I gone IVA hopefully it would have now disappeared.

 

 

I decided to do my own self help and agreed a monthly sum to each prorata that I could afford.

 

 

I'm on the opinion that I have probably now paid off the original amount I borrowed albeit without the interest

and so think enough is enough and if I could stop paying them as a result of them not providing a CCA

then given my arrangement has been in place for over 7 years

I would say my concious is clear if I didnt have to pay them anymore.

 

Wish I had discovered this site years ago :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I found it, but lost my job so couldn't get myself into the position you're in! My guess is that you have paid back the capital by now, or nearly done so, so could justify not paying them any more.

 

The CCA should provide details. If not, sign up to Noddle. I did and can define exactly what I owe my creditors!

 

It's free, my favourite price, and the response is almost instant!

 

Good luck

 

H

There is a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries.

On such a full sea are we now afloat, and we must take the current when it serves,

Or lose our ventures.

 

:tea::tea:One the other hand......Sod this, I'm off!:tea::tea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you get the CCa checked here

then we deal with each debt in an individual basis under its own thread

 

each debt is diff and it wrong to generalise.

 

but there no getting away from the underlying phrase of no CCA = NO pay.

 

but it not 'that' simple.

 

esp where the debt is still with the OC.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Carl,

 

I thought I'd already posted a reply but it seems to have gone adrift!

 

I discovered this site as a result of chatting with the CAB. Glad I got in with them when I did too 'cos they shut up shop, at least the chap I was working with left.

 

I'm not too far off retiring age now, so jobs are quite few & far between, but hope springs, as they say......

 

I will keep up what payments I can for the forseeable future, but if I hit 65 and am still looking, they can go swivel!

 

After all, they can squeal and whine all they like, but they can't have what I don't got!

 

H

There is a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries.

On such a full sea are we now afloat, and we must take the current when it serves,

Or lose our ventures.

 

:tea::tea:One the other hand......Sod this, I'm off!:tea::tea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

H,

 

Many thanks for the reply any.

 

Dx

 

I will take your advice and post when responses are received - spent the evening doing the letters for the CCAs, got the postal orders today at a cost of 50pon top of the £1 for each postal order - the cheek of the PO. Ive even made a record of which postal order has gone in with which letter (10 in total) :(

 

Will keep you updated under a separate thread and apologies again H for jumping on yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Mine went today too.

 

I got the list of the recipients and the reference Nos from the bank details, so I know that 4 of them are the originals

 

The other two are DCA's & I'll be very interested to see what they have to say!

 

As you say.....No CCA, no pay!

 

H

There is a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries.

On such a full sea are we now afloat, and we must take the current when it serves,

Or lose our ventures.

 

:tea::tea:One the other hand......Sod this, I'm off!:tea::tea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

it might be worth both of you too....

 

 

once each CCA reaches its 12+2 working days dead line

 

 

start a new thread for the debt in the forum of the name of the original creditor

and update us

else it will get MIGHTY confusing all in one thread

 

 

the main forum tab is top left

 

 

off that find the OC's named forum

click that

click post a new thread

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll do that dx. Thanks for the advice.

 

As 'they' say.....nolli illigitimo carborundum!

There is a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries.

On such a full sea are we now afloat, and we must take the current when it serves,

Or lose our ventures.

 

:tea::tea:One the other hand......Sod this, I'm off!:tea::tea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...