Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

category D car mis sold privately


mm001
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3407 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, i bought Nissan micra today from a private seller. Seller didn't mentioned us about any car accident history. It was unluckly rainy weather today.. i couldn't check car properly.

When i reached home i noticed car radio security code is locked. then i opened bonnet and noticed that front light is broken as well. then i checked HPI online and findout its category 'D' previous.

I did mentioned all this to seller but now he is not picking up my phone call.

Please help, i will appreciate your advice.. i paid £2700.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not telling you something like that would make it mis-described, but we have to say, assuming that he knew about it.

Being not as described and dangerous, (not that this car need be dangerous), are just about the only things you can get recompense from a private seller.

If he has owned the car some time, then it sounds as if he bought it from the insurance company and tidied it up himself. If he hasn't owned it for long or isn't on the log book, then he probably bought it at an auction for cleaning up and selling on.

 

 

How do you know he is a private seller ?

Some dodgy sellers, (is there any other sort), will take a car home from the dealership and sell it from their house pretending to be a private seller.

 

 

How long had he owned the car? that will say if he was aware.

This can have serious comebacks from your insurance. You will have to inform them. (They will know but won't mention it until you make a claim and they turn you down).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you have something in writing to say it wasn't a previous write off I'm afraid you've been the author of your own misfortune. If he said it wasn't a write off then you might be able to chance your arm but it's unlikely to justify the effort involved. If you just didn't ask then he wasn't obliged to volunteer to tell you everything that was wrong with the car.

 

 

You could try a strongly worded letter (keep a copy) but if he's ignoring your calls then he'll probably just ignore anything up to an actual summons and if you took it that far you are likely to lose if you don't have anything in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not telling you something like that would make it mis-described

Only if he said that it wasn't a cat D. A private seller's under no obligation to volunteer information.

 

This can have serious comebacks from your insurance. You will have to inform them. (They will know but won't mention it until you make a claim and they turn you down).
You only have to inform them if they ask (I've never come across an insurer which asks if the car has ever been written off), or if one of their assumptions is that the car hasn't been written off (this only apples to a handful of insurers). Insuring a Cat D is not generally a problem - the only issue if that if it gets written off again the payout may be reduced to reflect the fact that its market value is lower than that of a car which hasn't been written off.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much to all for your response.

I bought this car yesterday and found these problem later. Car headlight was broken from inside bonnet, radio security lock, accident category D etc... Previous owner kept this car for 3 years but accident happened before he bought this car. I mean accident happened in 2010 and previous owner bought this car in 2011.

I personality think this is mis-sold deal with hidden description which was not mentioned in car advert at all and not even they mentioned verbally.

Is there any legal action for this kind of matter? actually £2700 is a lot of money for me.

Previous owner is not picking my phone call and messages.

Please advise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you fail to inform the insurance company the probability is very high that they will refuse to pay out should you make a claim. If you watch their assessor, the first thing he does is look at the tax and then the tyres to see if there is an easy out for them.

Insurance companies do not like paying out and will do everything in the book to avoid it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The payout reduction for a Cat D should be pretty minor, maybe something like 10% if I were to pluck a figure out of thin air. D is cosmetic damage only.

 

 

When taking out insurance you're expected to act in utmost good faith, so if they ask you what the vehicles worth (or similar) I'd suggest following Conniff's advice and making sure they're aware of the facts. I doubt they'd refuse point blank to pay out if you didn't, but it could cause problems.

Edited by Slimm
Grammar
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much to all for your response.

I bought this car yesterday and found these problem later. Car headlight was broken from inside bonnet, radio security lock, accident category D etc... Previous owner kept this car for 3 years but accident happened before he bought this car. I mean accident happened in 2010 and previous owner bought this car in 2011.

I personality think this is mis-sold deal with hidden description which was not mentioned in car advert at all and not even they mentioned verbally.

Is there any legal action for this kind of matter? actually £2700 is a lot of money for me.

Previous owner is not picking my phone call and messages.

Please advise.

So you say that the write off was while he wasnt the owner?

 

So how can you prove he knew?

 

Sorry but if you dont HPi check a car before you buy it then thats your own fault really

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much to all for your response.

 

I bought this car yesterday and found these problem later. Car headlight was broken from inside bonnet, radio security lock, accident category D etc... Previous owner kept this car for 3 years but accident happened before he bought this car. I mean accident happened in 2010 and previous owner bought this car in 2011.

 

I personality think this is mis-sold deal with hidden description which was not mentioned in car advert at all and not even they mentioned verbally.

 

Is there any legal action for this kind of matter? actually £2700 is a lot of money for me.

 

Previous owner is not picking my phone call and messages.

 

Please advise.

 

Crack to inside of headlight doesn't make it un roadworthy.

 

Radio code missing is your problem. Thats a simple thing to test on purchase.

 

Cat d accident would have been on hpi should you have done it which you didn't so its your issue, not the seller.

 

I dont feel there is any legal action you can take as none of the above makes the car unsafe, and all of it would have been found if you had inspected the car properly.

 

I wouldn't pick up the phone to you either as I would have convinced myself you were trying to [problem] me by now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading through the problems you have found, they are all visible so even if the car was covered by the sale of goods act, they would be classed as obvious so it looks as if you didn't examine the car closely enough. Things like the radio code really is obvious and seen instantly by turning the radio on to see if it worked, likewise the broken headlight.

 

 

If he has been driving it for three years and it has MoT certificates for those three years plus a current one, then there is nothing inherently faulty that makes the car dangerous and the headlight meets MoT standard so no complaint.

 

 

£2,700 is a lot of money for anyone, which is all the more reason to have examined the car properly, or if you didn't feel confident enough, to have taken someone who knows cars with you. An HPI check beforehand for a few quid could have saved you this or let you know and then you could have haggled if you were happy to go ahead with the purchase.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...