Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sunak must be using GBNOTnews financial planners .. GB News losses up 38% to £42.4m giving channel total deficit of £76m since launch Losses in the latest accounting period were six times greater than revenue.   Mind you, as it seems to clearly be a disinformation service and route of money to poopy MPs and hangers on ... I'm sure they dont mind (mm is that the 'Tory guv or GBNews I'm talking about?.)   GB News owner pumps in further £41mn in funding as losses widen WWW.FT.COM Vehicle backed by hedge fund tycoon Paul Marshall steps in as right-leaning broadcaster increases number of staff   GB News losses grew 38% to £42.4m in 2023 financial year - Press Gazette PRESSGAZETTE.CO.UK GB News' operating losses grew 38% to £42.4m in the year to May 2023, the business has reported in its latest Companies House...  
    • United Kingdom Debt Clock: British National Debt Grow By The Second - Commodity.com COMMODITY.COM Want to know why the UK's national debt-to-GDP ratio is increasing so rapidly? See our overview of the UK national debt and GDP figures.   The tories borrowing last year alone was " £1,780 per head of the UK’s population"
    • Hi Schipoo and thank you for the update.   Excellent news for you and a huge relief, I imagine. You might like to start a new thread about Independent Tax if you want advice on that problem. HB
    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Housing Benefit overpayment


Ellie05
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3415 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

 

I need help and advice after finding I have been overpaidlink3.gif housing benefit £22kk!

 

 

My husband of 22yrs left me & started divorcelink3.gif after 3 wks same time dad was terminally ill with cancer

& passed away after another 4 wks(worse time ever).

 

Also found out I was anaemic (levels a 1/3 of normal)also on extra sedatives for panic attacks and anxiety.

Got letter about hsing overpaymentlink3.gif, appealed and lost.

 

Council admitted clerical error,

judges comments were "no particular skills required to notice this mistake that stood out like a sore thumb!"

Also on notes he said that council must be wary of overestimating what might be reasonable to expect of 1st time claimant. Is this conflicting?

 

I only learnt shortly b4 appeal I should of been paid the rent I pay,

so I didn't raise this at appeal but regret it now.

i did say though had I known of error I would of acted,

but judge made no note of this.

I know this May sound obvious but they input my monthly amount as wkly.

 

I also failed to notify of annual rent increases(shared ownership home) but they also failed in responsibility to award correct amount.

Felt like I was on trial with no representative to help & beating myself up not preparing more.

 

Now I want to know how and if I have a case to take this to upper tribunal or anyone else

(mp was useless, tried appeal to UT & refused,no explanation)

as I don't think they even had a dr understand the stress & effects of anaemia.

would u believe rep said after appeal this mistake easily happens!

 

It's been 7 months now and I'm still depressed and hacked off I'm in debt all because I had to claim HB.

 

Been signed off work by atos for depression etc. Sorry if long & thanks for reading

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go see a welfare rights agency to see if you have a case - it would depend on the statement of reasons you received from the judge and whether an error of law was made.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go see a welfare rights agency to see if you have a case - it would depend on the statement of reasons you received from the judge and whether an error of law was made.

 

Thankyou for your reply,I have tried a law firm and didn't find anything unlawful,can u tell me if the judges comments seem to contradict themself

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for your reply,I have tried a law firm and didn't find anything unlawful,can u tell me if the judges comments seem to contradict themself

 

Without seeing the arguments of the council, it's hard to tell if it's contradictory or not.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Why the overpayment & on what grounds are you appealing?

 

On the grounds that this was a clerical error that I could not have reasonably of known about. They admit that the mistake was caused by inputting monthly amount as weekly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the judge's comments do not appear contradictory in themselves

 

basically the judge is stating that the mistake the Council made was so obvious that you could reasonably have been aware that there was an overpayment, and therefore the overpayment is recoverable from you

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the judge's comments do not appear contradictory in themselves

 

basically the judge is stating that the mistake the Council made was so obvious that you could reasonably have been aware that there was an overpayment, and therefore the overpayment is recoverable from you

 

Agree but just want to clarify. Was the Housing Benefit paid directly to you or directly to your landlord?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ellie. So sorry to hear of the awful time you've been having. I don't know if I can help much but a few questions spring to mind and if you would answer them it might help us all try and sort this.

 

1. How long were you overpaid?

 

2. Was the whole overpayment after your ex-husband left?

 

3. Does your ex still have any share in the property?

 

4. Have you now notified HB of the increase(s) in rent and all other changes in circumstances during the relevant period?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cannot appeal to the Upper Tribunal just because you disagree with the FtT judge's decision

 

you can only appeal on points of law, for example, if the FtT failed to apply the law correctly

 

the law in relation to recoverability of HB overpayments is very harsh, the starting point is that all HB overpayments are recoverable

 

however the exception is that if the following 3 conditions are all met, the overpayment is not recoverable

1) the overpayment was caused by a error made by Council/DWP/HMRC

2) you or the person receiving payments (or anyone acting on your behalf) have not contributed to the error

3) you or the person receiving payments (or anyone acting on your behalf) could not have reasonably been aware that there was an overpayment

 

from the limited information you have provided, it sounds like you met the first 2 conditions, but the judge has decided you not not meet the 3rd as the error was so obvious

 

without knowing all the ins and outs of the case, it is difficulty to tell whether you have any grounds to appeal to the Upper Tribunal

 

as others have suggested, you should consider seeking professional advice from an experienced Welfare Benefits adviser

 

how long ago was your appeal heard?

how long ago did your receive the Statement of Reasons?

have you asked the FtT judge for leave to appeal?

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps others could advise whether increases in rent which the OP also failed to advise HB about or mention in her appeal. I realise it probably wouldn't make a massive difference to the amount owed but could it be additional evidence that could justify a further appeal?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

caro

 

it would really depend upon the grounds of the appeal and the outcome decision

 

the judge is unlikely to be under an obligation to consider an issue that has not been raised by either party - this is unlikely to constitute an error of law

 

if the appeal and decision only covered recoverability and not the amount - there may be a possibility to consider underlying entitlement (assuming this has not already been applied)

 

if the appeal and decision covered the amount as well as recoverability issue, then the OP may be too late for underlying entitlement

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that id. :)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the grounds that this was a clerical error that I could not have reasonably of known about. They admit that the mistake was caused by inputting monthly amount as weekly.

 

So were you being paid full rent? Ie was the HB you were getting more than your actual rent?

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...