Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanx Londoneill get on to it this evening having a read around these forums I can’t seem to find many success stories using your methods. So how successful are these methods or am I just buying time for him  and a ccj will be inevitable in the end. Thanks another question is, will he have to appear at court..? I am not sure he has got it in him
    • Here's a suggested modified version for consideration by the team. (Not sure whether it still gives too much away?)   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you added. Shall we raise the related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding parking periods. Especially with no consideration of section 13 in your own trade association's code of practice and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked, unmanaged over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the above issues and more, with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture a couple of useless ANPR photos. If you insist on continuing this stupid, money grabbing quest, after having all of the above pointed out, we will of course show this letter to the Judge and request “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Signed, "Spot". (Vehicle Keeper's pet Dalmation).
    • Paying DCA's one penny, never mind £50 per month is a mugs game, they have really been milking him as a cash cow   See where received a claim form is underlined in your post, you need to click, on that and read carefully, then answer the questions, then copy and paste into a post on this thread Forget the CAB ,  their advice is sometimes weird. Is it worth defending? Lowell brought these debts for 10 p in the pound , years ago, because they are flawed. Think about it! if it was such an easy win, Capital one could have taken it to court and crushed him.  It could be an invalid agreement, default notice, or many other things. In a nutshell , yes, and we can help you.
    • Origin moved to EA App... I know this all too well.  Reach out to Customer Services I would to see what they can do. 
    • Welcome - One of the team will take a look shortly
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Carter/Lowell Claimform - old disputed Vodafone 'debt' - ordered to produce Paperwork


Rose1974
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3390 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I am hoping for some advice regarding proceeding to court, I will try and outline what has gone on so far!

 

I was contacted by Lowell Portfolio some time last year regarding an old Vodafone debt.

I was not aware what this was as I had previously had a Vodafone contract but terminated the contracted

and as far as I was aware settled the account.

 

 

I do remember querying the account with Vodafone at the time but to my knowledge this had been sorted.

 

I have repeatedly asked Lowell and later Bryan Carter to send me a copy of the contract and information relating to the debt this was never sent.

 

 

I then received a claim form and filed a defence of having no knowledge of the debt and despite repeated requests been given no paperwork.

 

they then sent me a TOMLIN order and told me that I could sign this and pay or they would take me to court.

I again asked for paperwork and told them whilst I did not wish to go to court I would not be bullied

or harassed into paying a debt I had no knowledge of.

 

The court mediator called and (sounding very cross) told me there was no point in mediation

as I had no paperwork relating to the debt so there was no way a settlement could be reached (I quite agree).

 

 

She said she would refer onto the small claims court.

 

After this I contacted Vodafone myself to get to the bottom of it,

they have said it is in relation to a contract that was terminated in January 2009,

which is when the last DD was received on the account and

apparently they then added an early termination fee.

 

 

Money owing on the account was then paid between July 2009 - June 2010.

I asked if they could send me a copy of the contract and

they said they would no longer have it but would send me a breakdown of what was owed

- not that helpful as I do not believe I was in a contract a the point I left them.

 

I have received a General Form of Judgement It is ordered that: or Order today and it states:

 

1. Claimant do file and serve by 4.00pm on 16th February 2015 a copy of the agreement in accordance with CPR PD 16

paragraph 7.3 together with a schedule of payments to the account. There after file to be referred to the judge.

 

2.This order having been made by the court pursuant either to rule 3.3 or rule 23.8 of the civil procedure rules 1998,

any party affected by this order has a right to apply to set it aside, vary or stay it by application made

not more than 7 days after this order was served on the party making the application.

 

Sorry for the very long post but having got this far I am not a bit confused if I need to do anything in relation to this letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have till 16th feb to send proof you owe this money else it get stayed or you strike it out I think.

 

can you for sake of clarity of info needed

for the legal crew fill this in and paste the results here:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

 

also it might help to post up a suitably redacted copy of the defence you filed.

 

thank you.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my defence I just put I did not know what the debt was for and dispite repeated requests to Lowell

they had not provided me with any paperwork relating to it.

I stated that I did not owe the debt.

 

What is the claim for For 184

the amount due under an agreement between the original creditor

and the defendant to provide finance and / or service / or goods.

This debt was assigned to / purchased by Lowell portfolio on 11/04/2014

and notice served pursuant to the LAW of priority act 1925

RE - vodafonelink3.gif

A/C No ###########

 

The claimant also claims stator interestlink3.gif pursuant to S.69 of the county act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment o the agreement to date but limited to a maximum of one year and a maximum of 100 amounting to 9.13

What is the value of the claim? £ 184.00

Is the claim for a current account (overdrafticon) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Mobile phone

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? I believe my original contract was before 2007

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Lowell portfolio

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ?

No - nothing is on my credit file from vodafone however lowell have now added something.

Why did you cease payments? I believed account was settled so nothing was owed

What was the date of your last payment? July 2010

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Apparently so!

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan? NA

Hope that's okay let me know if I need to add anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not being funny please post up your defence as you submitted it

[minus pers info.

 

 

and is that the complete PoC from the claimform?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

 

My defence was:

 

 

I do not owe this money, despite repeated requests I have been provided no paperwork showing a contract or any documentation relating to what this debt is for. The only evidence I have been given is a demand for money from Lowell Portfolio but no explanation as to what this is for.

 

 

The POC also had

 

 

RE - Vodafone

A/C No ###########

 

 

The claimant also claims stator interest pursuant to S.69 of the county act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment o the agreement to date but limited to a maximum of one year and a maximum of 100 amounting to 9.13.

 

 

I know this seems rather short but I was and still am slightly bemused by the whole situation. It seems incredible to me that you can be taken to court without a company having to give you any proof or information about the monies they claim you owe!

 

 

I appreciate any help I just don't want to miss doing anything at this stage that I am supposed to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

all seems to ticking along nicely

 

 

not a lot more you can do

 

 

well done

 

 

sadly as you are finding

 

 

DCA's issue these like confetti in the hope people

don't defend and they get a default uncontested judgement.

 

 

that's how they make their money

oh and ofcourse by fleecing threat-o-grams.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rose1974,

 

If you'd like any help from me, email me with your details via the Contact us form here and quote the code WRT135 - CAG Forum in the subject line.

 

Once sent, you'll receive an automated reply with a reference number. Post back with this and I’ll check I've received it.

 

Kind regards,

 

Lee

 

Social Media Comms

 

Vodafone UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...