Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
    • Whilst trying to point score over Biden, Trump can't remember the name of his own doctor. Trump gets name of his doctor wrong as he challenges Biden to cognitive test | Donald Trump | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Gaffe came as 78-year-old Republican presidential candidate sought to bolster his support among Black and Latino voters in Michigan  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Parking Charge Notice A S Parking


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2397 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello I am after some advice please.

 

Today I parked at the Old Station Yard Car Park, Fowey, Cornwall (owned by Fowey Harbour Commissioners) arriving at 8.57am. It was explained to me by 5 members of the public (all members of the local rowing club)that the ticket machine was out of order and would not accept either money or credit card payment. I did not try the machine myself as I didn't doubt what they were saying. There is also no mobile phone reception at the carpark (or indeed most of Fowey for that matter) so I could not telephone the number as displayed on the notice board.

 

I placed a note on the inside of my car stating that at 8.57am the machine was out of order. I returned to my car at approx 10.15 and I had been issued with a PCN at 9.47am (Observed at 9.32am) (I returned whilst the parking attendant was still present and had issued tickets to approx 15 other vehicles!)

 

The PCN states that a charge of £100 is due within 28 days (or £60 if payment is received within 14 days)

 

Should I contact AS Parking to contest the notice or should I just pay up? Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its a private car park, then you dont owe a single penny. Its a speculative invoice. Not a fine.

 

 

If you had a windscreen ticket issues, then you have to wait for them to send a NTK to you, which should come AFTER a minimum of (19 days)?.

 

Then you can have some fun with them and start costing THEM money.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post up a redacted copy of the NTD please?

 

As this is harbour commission land you say, then it may be covered by byelaws, so no POFA 2012 and keeper liability.

Wait for the NTK, which has to be received by the keeper between 29-56 days of the NTD, if the POFA 2012 is being used.

 

Make no contact with AS yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your replies. I've copied the back and front of the PCN as requested. Also done a google search and yes, it is a private car park run by the Fowey Harbour Commissioners (FHC). Should I contact the Harbour Commissioners to explain the situation?

 

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]55188[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Itsa a regular PPC. Use GPEOL. Notice how they say they rely on POFA. Wait for the NTK from them and go for the throat :) Easy win.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your replies. I've copied the back and front of the PCN as requested. Also done a google search and yes, it is a private car park run by the Fowey Harbour Commissioners (FHC). Should I contact the Harbour Commissioners to explain the situation?

 

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]55188[/ATTACH]

 

Contact no one regarding this until you receive something in the post.

 

This has to be between 29-56 days of the NTD.

 

You will appeal this NTK if you get one, and it will ultimately get cancelled.

 

What you can do is try to find out from the HC if the land is covered by byelaws.

They probably will be reluctant to tell you if they are, as they may be getting a cut of the tickets that are paid...

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is NOT "relevant land" as required for the PoFA to be the relevant legislation. I would do nothing for the moment and wait to se if they write to you and when you receive a demand, what capacity they are demanding it from you as harbours are like railways and airports, they have their own legislation so you will need to know what the byelaws for that harbour is before saying anything in response but as said, the POFA doesnt count so you and they cannot rely upon it.. One thing is certain though, AS parking cannot claim anything from you as they dont have the authority so they can get lost (Harbour Board cannot delegate their powers). The harbour board can claim from the DRIVER of the vehicle as there is no keeper liability whatsoever and can initiate criminal action if it is in their powers to do so but I would bet that the byelaws are relevant to unloading and loading of vessels and not car parking. Generally the laws they upohold are there for the upkeep of the harbiour and mention fines for unloading coal in the wrong place, etc. The harbour board have to make public the laws they are emplowered to enforce so contact the local council or library there if you want to keep things close to your chest at the moment.

Let us know what and when you receive next, I doubt if the timing of the next begging letter is compliant with PoFA in any case. They are hoping you will just be panicked into paying up because some bloke in a uniforma has slapped a bit of paper that purports to be official on your car. Works most of the time so no need to change just because it is inlawful is there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fowey harbour byelaws;

 

http://www.foweyharbour.co.uk/terms-conditions.html

 

93. Parking of Vehicles (1)No person shall park or leave a vehicle in any place where it is likely to obstruct or interfere with the use of the harbour premises or in any part of the harbour premises where the parking of vehicles is prohibited and notice of such prohibition has been erected by the Harbour Master. (2)Any notice erected under paragraph (1) of this byelaw shall be conspicuously posted in or in proximity to the place to which it relates. (3)If the Harbour Master so directs, the owner of a vehicle parked and left in contravention of paragraph (1) of this byelaw shall remove the same to a place where it does not contravene the byelaw, and if the owner fails to comply with the Harbour Master’s direction or cannot reasonably be found the Harbour Master may remove the vehicle.

 

The advice is still to wait for the NTK in the post, and do not contact AS by any means yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The usual practice of parking companies is to send a Notice to Keeper, stating on the back something along the lines of " Any appeals must include the name and a serviceable address of the driver ". They are trying it on with this, as you have no legal obligation to name the driver. They only include this because they know that there is no keeper liability so they're relying on you to tell them who to chase.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
Hi All,

 

Found this forum after a Google search so Hi !

 

I am sorry to resurrect an old thread like this but am wondering how the OP got on with this as I have just had an AS Parking ticket at the same car park.

 

Were you able to contest this or were you never contacted ?

 

Cheers

Nobby.

 

Hello, you will need to start your own thread on this as it will go missed here, are the circumstances the same?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

go start a new thread

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so did you read this thread properly?

If so then you will know not to contact them to contest it as they have no authority to do anything and by appealing they will be encouraged to continue to try and get monies from you.

Read a load of other threads to see what usually happens and for the whens and whats

 

Hi All,

 

Found this forum after a Google search so Hi !

 

I am sorry to resurrect an old thread like this but am wondering how the OP got on with this as I have just had an AS Parking ticket at the same car park.

 

Were you able to contest this or were you never contacted ?

 

Cheers

Nobby.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...