Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • On the other thread you posted on, you asked about immigration issues. We aren't qualified to give that advice, sadly, you would need to find an authorised adviser. 'It is a criminal offence for a person to provide immigration advice or services in the UK unless their organisation is regulated by the Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC) or is otherwise covered by the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999. Members of certain professional bodies may give immigration advice without registering with OISC.' How to become a regulated immigration adviser - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK  
    • Hi. Can you show us the letter from the police please? Cover up your name and address. Our upload guide will help you. HB
    • Baidu's Qu Jing tells workers she does not care for them because, 'I am not your mum'.View the full article
    • mkmkmk, please start a new thread of your own and we'll advise you. This thread is for Wen9821. EDIT: the thread is here. HB
    • Met are out of order in this new version of their PCN. They show your car arriving and leaving via the ANPR cameras. They then go on to describe this as the parking period knowing full well that since your car still has to drive to a parking space and later drive from the parking space to the exit. How this can be described as a parking period with so much driving involved is beyond me.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI - statute barred debts sold on with NOA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3454 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Not sure why you mention NoA

- it's immaterial here

- but you can claim after S B.

 

 

What do you mean by unenforceable except egg ?

 

 

All S B debts are unenforceable.

 

 

Be aware that some OCs may attempt to send the repayment to the purchaser.

Don't let them.

The proceeds are yours.

And make sure to use the spreadsheet on this forum and get your calculations checked by others here unless you're absolutely certain.

 

 

I trust you are waiting for S B date to pass before reclaiming?

 

 

That would be best,

to avoid any possible tangles involving the purchaser.

Link to post
Share on other sites

matters not if the debt has been sold

matters not if the debt is/is not SB'd.

matters not if its un-en or not

 

 

get an sar off

get all the statements.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

matters not if the debt has been sold

matters not if the debt is/is not SB'd.

matters not if its un-en or not

 

 

get an sar off

get all the statements.

 

 

dx

My Egg agreement I understand to be enforceable - has been sold on to DCA and

I have a copy of the Notice of Assignment(s).

EGG SB imminent .

 

 

My understanding is that if it's sold on with NOA the refund would be mine and not offset against the debt?

 

 

otherwise the refund would be offset against the debt therefore constituting a payment and re-starting the SB clock again??

 

 

I am talking substantial amounts so is it best to SAR first?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your first post "some imminent S B" and last - "substantial amounts" - both implied that you have maybe several.

 

 

On that basis I suggested waiting until absolutely sure the bar date had passed.

It also led me to assume that you had relevant statements or other evidence. Now it seems you don't.

 

In that case, SAR is your first step. This won't affect sb status.

 

We've already told you twice that when the debt has been sold, the O C is not entitled to pay your refund to the assignee and S B status is irrelevant.

In some cases, O C has been known to try this wheeze but backed down when challenged.

 

If you have accounts other than Egg that you need guidance about reclaiming on,

could you clarify by giving brief summary of the position for each please?

 

 

Are the O C still the owners or have they been assigned?

 

 

Do you know exactly when they will become S B?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies for being vague and for you having to repeat yourself. I have retrieved relevant paperwork today as recently moved home. Egg I believe last payment was 6 years ago today (2008) but I need to throughly check this and will need to send SAR request as I don't have statements. Sold on to Aktiv and I have NOA for that. final balance £6k+ . I need to calculate how much PPI I paid - hence SAR needed.

 

Yorkshire Bank - last payment/acknowledgement late September 2008 £9k+ I have statements as I have SAR previously. Sold on with NOA.

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

You will find all the spread sheets in the link above.

 

If this debt is statute barred, you might still find that the original creditor will make attempts to offset it against the account. Unfortunately even the FOS have been siding with creditors in this respect.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

egg [Canadian square will offset to the debt buyer even if statute barred

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

egg [Canadian square will offset to the debt buyer even if statute barred

dx

Not if you can't get any sense out of them and have to take them through the courts... :-)http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?421670-Hillards-v-Egg-reclaim-charges-PPI-query

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been checking some paperwork. YB have taken the £10 SAR request fee as a payment!! last true payment was Sept 2008 £10 SAR fee paid Feb 2009 shows up on statement as a payment . Crafty.

 

Did you specify in your SAR that the payment was only to be used for that purpose...? Lots of similar threads around where people have been advised to put that in the letter, to make sure they cannot mess you about claiming it is a payment against the account. I always state that and add in something about if payment is not required to return the cheque. ;-)

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.this is copied and pasted from original letter so no I didn't - however surely this is a misappropriation of said fee??

 

 

thnks

Did you specify in your SAR that the payment was only to be used for that purpose...? Lots of similar threads around where people have been advised to put that in the letter, to make sure they cannot mess you about claiming it is a payment against the account. I always state that and add in something about if payment is not required to return the cheque. ;-)
Link to post
Share on other sites

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10.

Which told them it was the fee for the SAR, so they should not have taken it as a payment. Probably too late to complain about it now, but worth remembering if they try to use that in denying the debt to be statute barred.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes this was at the time when I was naiive and didn't realise this sort of thing took place. More recently I wrote to a DCA who did the same with £1 CCA fee but I wrote and disputed it.

 

I will try and claim on this YB as I know the last true payment was in September 2008 ( not counting the misappropriation of the £10)and this ties up with the final balance. Marlin also wrote to me agreeing the "agreement is unenforceable". I only have stements as far back as 2003 but the account was opened in 1984. I paid for this for at least 5 years .

 

My worry is though how would this be worded to avoid acknowledging the debt /re-starting the SB clock again??

Edited by cleo4patra
omission
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks - I have had a look!!!! crikey. I am going to have a go at completing a spreadsheet. I have four/five years worth of statements which clearly showed my premiums. which one do I complete and on I am unsure which interet rate to put in - thanks

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

You will find all the spread sheets in the link above.

 

If this debt is statute barred, you might still find that the original creditor will make attempts to offset it against the account. Unfortunately even the FOS have been siding with creditors in this respect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what type of account card/loan or bank account?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

might be better to start a new thread

as info comes thru for each of the reclaims.

 

 

ideally for a credit card

you should use the FOS running sheet.

 

 

however you could use the FOSCISHEET.

 

 

put their APR in cell d 15

 

 

then input each PPI payment

from the statements

on a new line [row] for each one

 

 

the sheet does the rest.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...