Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Burchell Edwards 2nd claimform for bogus House selling fees - 1st case was discontinued


Me-jules7
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2998 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Our house was up for sale with Elder Twells first with their board outside, the buyers sister lives round the corner.

 

Buyer contacted Burchell on several occasions requesting details - they never sent them to him that's why he contacted me direct.

 

The claim is around £2.5

 

My main queries are:

 

The original claim went right to 2 days before the court hearing when they sent in a letter stating not continuing with claim to the courts.

 

They state in new claim they have corresponded with me on several occasions when in fact the last I heard from them was the withdrawal letter.

 

There is no 'special' permission applied for I've phoned money claim online this morning.

 

Thanks for all the advice :-)

Julie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for the clarification. The problem with your case is that buyer must have known Burchells were instructed to sell the property, otherwise he would not have contacted them. I am not sure if this would be enough to trigger liability for commission. Probably not, but you still need to get your hands on a copy of the document you signed. It sounds like they haven't complied with their own T&Cs and if you can point to that, that will be incredibly persuasive for the judge.

 

 

Good to hear the claim is for £2.5k. You might as well defend it all the way then, since it is very unlikely they'll recover any costs from you even if they win. The key is to be properly prepared - push hard for a copy of that document.

 

 

I think you should write to the claimant separately from the court process informing them that you haven't heard anything from them whatsoever, and to ask them to make sure correspondence is directed to the correct address. Keep a copy of this - it is important to have a paper trail if they send any more documents to the wrong address.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya

 

I've found the original document it says sole agency :-(

 

I will defend all the way again!

 

I kept the money to one side to pay from the last claim if we weren't successful but when they pulled the claim we spent the money. It was back in March and I've had nothing since!

 

If they actually assisted in the sale of my house and not pushed for the higher bracket to increase their costs to me I would have no issue in paying them, Whitegates who we brought our house from helped the whole way through the process of anything the money should go to them :-)

 

Thanks for all the advise really appreciate it :-)

 

Mejules7

Link to post
Share on other sites

Civil Procedure Rules 1998 state the following:

 

Discontinuance and subsequent proceedings;

 

38.7 A claimant who discontinues a claim needs the permission of the court to make another claim against the same defendant if –

 

(a) he discontinued the claim after the defendant filed a defence; and

 

(b) the other claim arises out of facts which are the same or substantially the same as those relating to the discontinued claim.

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Civil Procedure Rules 1998 state the following:

 

Discontinuance and subsequent proceedings;

 

38.7 A claimant who discontinues a claim needs the permission of the court to make another claim against the same defendant if –

 

(a) he discontinued the claim after the defendant filed a defence; and

 

(b) the other claim arises out of facts which are the same or substantially the same as those relating to the discontinued claim.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Massively yes thank you very muchly :-D 😻👍👊😋

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MJ,

 

I've found the original document it says sole agency :-(

 

I will defend all the way again!

 

Can you confirm who the document is from and how it affects the case. :???:

 

Thanks :-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Massively yes thank you very muchly :-D 😻👍👊😋

 

You're Welcome.

 

Defend the claim in full, note the CPR section as quoted above, it might also be worth applying to strike the claim out on that basis. I'm not sure whether it'll be applicable, but you might also be able to claim losses (£18 per hour for litigant in person). I'm sure others will clarify or correct me if I'm wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Our house was up for sale with Elder Twells first with their board outside, the buyers sister lives round the corner.

 

Buyer contacted Burchell on several occasions requesting details - they never sent them to him that's why he contacted me direct.

 

 

I'm a bit confused here. Where do Elder Twells come into this? Up to this point the thread was all about Burchell Edwards. It's Burchell Edward who have issued proceedings against you yes? And previously Connells issued proceedings? (Connells and Burchell Edwards are both part of the Skipton Building Society Group but Elder Twells is an entirely independnent estae agent as far as I can see from their website.)

 

Did you instruct both Elder Twells and Burchell Edwards at the same time? Were both their boards outside your house at the same time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its great that you found the original document. What does it say about payment of commission? And also about their obligation to market the property? I'm hoping there is something in there you can use against them.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its great that you found the original document. What does it say about payment of commission? And also about their obligation to market the property? I'm hoping there is something in there you can use against them.

Will check this when I get home :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a bit confused here. Where do Elder Twells come into this? Up to this point the thread was all about Burchell Edwards. It's Burchell Edward who have issued proceedings against you yes? And previously Connells issued proceedings? (Connells and Burchell Edwards are both part of the Skipton Building Society Group but Elder Twells is an entirely independnent estae agent as far as I can see from their website.)

 

Did you instruct both Elder Twells and Burchell Edwards at the same time? Were both their boards outside your house at the same time?

 

I put the house up with Elder Twells first they put their board straight up literally the same day, but Burchell advised I could use their 14 day cancellation to come away from them. Jodie (Burchell) as she left my house pulled down elder Twells board as she went, she then went and hand delivered the cancellation form to Elder Twells also.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mJ,

 

Do you have the Elder Twells agreement to confirm if you had a 14 day cancellation clause ?

 

Do you know how long it was between you instructing Elder Twells and Burchells getting you to use them instead ?

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mJ,

 

Do you have the Elder Twells agreement to confirm if you had a 14 day cancellation clause ?

 

Do you know how long it was between you instructing Elder Twells and Burchells getting you to use them instead ?

 

:-)

 

Hi Slick

 

Unfortunately I don't have the elder Twells :-(

 

If I remember correctly it was approx a week, I phoned Elders earlier and they confirmed they have a 14 day cool off period.

Apologies for the delay in getting back to you :-)

 

Cheers

MJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MJ,

 

OK, we can leave Elder Twells out of the equation as they were dis-instructed when Burchells signed you up.

 

I assume that you have already lodged your Acknowledgement of Service but please confirm.

 

Please respond to the Q's raised by Steampowered in post #34.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

morning

 

apologies I've had no laptop it decided it had enough grew wings and is now enjoying life in laptop heaven lol :-)

 

Filed defence last night, used same defence as last time then also included the bit from above, fingers crossed it's enough :-)

 

Thanks again for your help I will keep you updated

 

MJ x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

yes!!!

 

 

well done!!:whoo:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent :)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The judge was very much in my favour

went down the customer satisfaction line and that from all my emails and copy letters

I obviously wasn't a satisfied customer.

 

 

Burchell had no response, the lady who originally came to my house to value it refused to attend

and the office manager who attended said he understood after listening to my account of things where I was coming from.

 

 

I think he thought the signed contract was all he needed

his face was a complete picture when the judge awarded in my favour.

 

I can't remembered the exact law/rule she quoted but stated any further attempts to take me to court would also be chucked out.

 

Very happy that from recieving the initial brochure via email I kept all correspondence and also that between myself and the buyer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great to see you won.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...