Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later the your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. So if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place and park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and then unload the children followed by reloading the children getting seat belts on etc before driving to the exit stopping for cars, pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
    • Hi  no nothing yet. Hope it stays that way 😬
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unknowingly bought an unroadworthy car - 1 years MOT passed 1 month ago, please help!


torison
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3522 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I purchased a used Alfa GT 1.9 JTD from a private seller advertising on autotrader around 1 month ago.

 

this was the advertisement posted:

 

M-JET 16v 3 DOOR GT COUPE, WITH FULL LEATHER INTERIOR , FULL SERVICE HISTORY ALL MANUALS 2 KEYS AND PLENTY OF RECIEPTS, RECENT CLUTCH AND SERVICE,REAR SPRING AND DROP LINKS, 6 SPEED MANUAL 150 bhp POWER AND ECONOMY ALL UNDER ONE HOOD.TWIN TAIL PIPE EXHAUST,SOUGHT AFTER STYLISH ITALIAN THOROUGH-BRED COUPE ALL IN COLOUR CODED AZZURE, BLUE, Next MOT due 04/09/2015, Tax expires 31/01/2015, Full service history, Electric windows, Air conditioning, Parking aid, CD player, Leather trim, Height adjustable driver's seat, Folding rear seats, Sports seats, Metallic paint, Alloy wheels, Power steering, Cruise control, Central locking, Alarm, Immobiliser, Driver's airbags, Side airbags, Passenger airbags. 5 seats, £1,999

 

the private seller took me for a drive and I had a short test drive in it. everything seemed fine during the drive. the HPI check was clear and he showed me the totally clear MOT certificate issued the week before.

 

I bought the car and have been using it for driving to work etc. i noticed a few minor issues immediately (as you would expect from a used car) but last week the whole car began to judder. i took the car in to my local specialist garage who said that the car should not have passed its MOT test and would have failed on at least 5 separate points as well as several advisories. the MOT certificate I was provided was completely clear.

 

The certificate is legitimate (i check on the mot check website) but the results are clearly falsified.

 

I am unsure what to do.

 

I cant afford to buy another car without some kind of refund. what rights do i have and what would your advice be moving forward.

 

if i report the car to VOSA my worry is i will be left without a drivable car - they will fail the MOT and i assume will get no refund to my outlay.

 

i don't want to sell the car on as i don't want the same thing to happy to another person, and i don't want to scrap the car as i will lose most of the money i have just spent.

 

if I ring the private seller he will tell me to sling my hook "buyer beware, sold as seen" etc

 

thanks for any help and advice you can give.

 

Torison

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could ask your M.O.T man to give you a list of the definite failure points and what he considered were advisories. Although an M.O.T is only valid at the time that the vehicle was tested, these faults were probably there at the time of the test. Contact the seller with your findings and see if he's prepared to come to an arrangement that us acceptable to you. If not, toll him that you will be contacting VOSA regarding the dodgy M.O.T and asking them to investigate the test station. You could also contact the test station yourself and tell them that you're prepared to go to VOSA. This may well frighten them into buying the car off you themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

+1 to the above except that advisories don't count, they are merely someone's opinion.

 

 

against this is the fact that an MOT is regarded as a snapshot of the car's condition on the day of the test only, apart from corrosion near to a structural area where the limit is I think 3 months.

 

 

The reason for MOTs being only a snapshot 'on the day' is that who is to say you didn't drive into a huge pothole and snap a spring etc? (not saying you did btw!)

 

 

So you may struggle, but worth trying to do something.

 

 

As an aside, when I was in the trade, I had heard of a [problem] where the car was brought back to you a few days later with claims that the MOT was bent because the tyres were bald.

 

 

I asked the MOT station to make a note of the tyre brands on the cars I sold after this, and, sure enough it happened to me... whereupon I requested that they put it in writing. I was then able to show that the tyres on the car at time of MOT were 'XYX 205/55 16' and NOT the worn out racing slicks the customer had put on in order to get some money out of me! a threat to report them to the police for fraud together with their written complaint (couldn't deny it!) usually resulted in them running away as fast as they could!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, thanks for all your replies.

the alfa specialist i took the car too also carries out MOTs,

 

the failures he noted were

near side upper wishbones very very loose/worn - wheel dangerously 'floating' as he put it, moving very easily

the center exhaust bracket was broken?

the offside rear suspension spring had come of the top of the mount and was resting on the chassis, the spring itsself was the wrong type and it was badly fitted

the offside inner driveshaft boot was split

the headlight motor had failed

and the engine/gearbox mountings were very loose and poorly fitted

 

there were numerous other advisory issues.

 

bear in mind that the MOT i was provided from 1 week before purchase was totally clear, no advisories at all.

 

I think my first point of call will be to contact the seller directly. I will probably record the call if possible and keep it as calm as I can on my side.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, always record, don't call him until you can.

 

 

the offside rear suspension spring had come of the top of the mount and was resting on the chassis, the spring itsself was the wrong type and it was badly fitted
I think that will be your main point of complaint. It is different to the nearside ?

If it is a different spring on each side, then that would class the car as dangerous. If the seller tells you where to go, you will need a proper written report from your garage so you can take it further.

 

 

You say you took it to a specialist, did you actually have an MoT done or just a check ?

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

just a check... i could feel something was wrong with the car so i thought i would get them to look over it and they came back with this huge list of issues. the guy at the alfa garage is happy to write a report if required, i spoke with him on the phone this afternoon.

 

so first port of call is to ring the seller and calmly explain i would like a refund?

 

then the dodgy mot garage ?

 

then calling VOSA?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

so first port of call is to ring the seller and calmly explain i would like a refund?

 

then the dodgy mot garage ?

 

then calling VOSA?

 

 

 

 

 

Speak to the DVSA (used to be VOSA) first, in case they want to investigate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

im just worried that i will end up with nothing if i contact them first Raykay. i would rather negotiate a refund or free fix without having to take it further.

if the DVSA agree the car is unroadworthy i am stuck without transport to get to work and a big loss to my bank balance that i cant afford right now (not that theres ever a good time to throwaway money).

Link to post
Share on other sites

im just worried that i will end up with nothing if i contact them first Raykay. i would rather negotiate a refund or free fix without having to take it further.

if the DVSA agree the car is unroadworthy i am stuck without transport to get to work and a big loss to my bank balance that i cant afford right now (not that theres ever a good time to throwaway money).

 

 

 

The problem with a private sale is that the seller could just say 'I knew nothing about that, as far as I knew, everything was fine', and you have no recourse, it is not like buying from the trade where you have some protection.

 

 

If things are as bad as you say, DVSA may want to investigate the MOT station that passed the car, before you alert them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

''M-JET 16v 3 DOOR GT COUPE, WITH FULL LEATHER INTERIOR , FULL SERVICE HISTORY ALL MANUALS 2 KEYS AND PLENTY OF RECIEPTS, RECENT CLUTCH AND SERVICE,REAR SPRING AND DROP LINKS, 6 SPEED MANUAL 150 bhp POWER AND ECONOMY ALL UNDER ONE HOOD.TWIN TAIL PIPE EXHAUST,SOUGHT AFTER STYLISH ITALIAN THOROUGH-BRED COUPE ALL IN COLOUR CODED AZZURE, BLUE, Next MOT due 04/09/2015, Tax expires 31/01/2015, Full service history, Electric windows, Air conditioning, Parking aid, CD player, Leather trim, Height adjustable driver's seat, Folding rear seats, Sports seats, Metallic paint, Alloy wheels, Power steering, Cruise control, Central locking, Alarm, Immobiliser, Driver's airbags, Side airbags, Passenger airbags. 5 seats, £1,999''

 

 

Can't see any outright lies in there though TBQH.

 

 

Notwithstanding that there is little doubt that the seller was aware...the problem is that a private seller is deemed to have insufficient mechanical knowledge to be able to state the mechanical condition of a car.

 

 

Your best bet is to try and force the sellers hand by doing what you can with VOSA (not VOSA now but you know what I mean) and getting the MOT station to put it largely in the condition they said it was a month ago, at the same time getting any contribution you can from the seller.

Link to post
Share on other sites

he said he was buying another car and was going to pick it up that weekend. although he already had another alfa GT in the drive way when i went to see the car. once the V5C came back the previous registered keeper IS NOT the seller. this is quite confusing, and suggests he never registered the vehicle.

 

i have tried ringing the seller but the phone is either turned off or he refuses to pick up.

 

i think he knew exactly what he was doing, but theres no way to prove it.

 

if he refuses to contact me is the next step VOSA? im just so worried that i will contact them they will agree the car is unroadworthy and i will be left with no transport. yes the MOT garage will get a fine, nothing will happen to the seller and i will be left out of pocket... can VOSA force the garage to fix the car?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...