Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
    • OK. Thank you all for the input.  I'll ignore their letters of demand but NEVER ignore a letter of claim. I'm bracing myself for the stress as their demands £££ goes up and the case gets sent to debt collectors. 
    • OK.  It was worth a try. Their case is still pants and they have broken their own Code of Practice numerous times.
    • @BankFodder sorry for the delay and thank you for the lengthy reply. Yes, I agree. It's a small business and the guy is very very decent. I know someone else said my priority shouldn't be worrying whether he gets shafted but I'm not here to try and screw him over because I feel like if someone behaves decently and gets exploited, they might not behave so kindly in the future. I know DX mentioned he thinks I've caused the issue by leaving multiple instructions, but I have already explained why and both instructions were to leave it with a neighbour and there was nothing advising the driver to abandon the parcel on my doorstep. I don't think leaving it there could be considered a safe place.  I am still waiting on the retailer to respond. Ultimately, I wanted to know how he would proceed if DPD's response isn't favourable. I am certainly not looking to cause any problems. I just want my laptop. I will read the other posts for sure. I've been a bit preoccupied with family stuff. I have nothing in writing from DPD as I phoned them, but they did advise it should be the retailer that liaises with them. I tried contacting the driver straight after deliver via Whatsapp, as that's an option, but it said I couldn't send him a message and I have kept that log. We all know who took the parcel on our street, because that person has a history of parcel theft, but I don't have a doorbell camera or cctv. Police are refusing to intervene, despite the fact that I, along with several other people, spotted another's neighbour's parcel in said "suspect's" car and confronted her to get the parcel back. If the police had acted sooner, I might have had a better chance of getting the parcel back, but I suspect the laptop has long been sold on.  When the retailer responds, I will send him the link to this thread. Hopefully, he will benefit from the information on here as well.
    • @dx100uk none of the instructions advised them to leave the parcel on my door step and without such instructions., I'm struggling to see why they think it's ok to just dump it there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

virgin media been taking money out for over a year by dd. service was cancelled


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3374 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 202
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry steampowered, I must have been writing at the same time as you.

Didn't mean to repeat your post

 

No worries! We posted at the same time. It is always useful for people to have a second opinion.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks. i have just paid the amount and and sent an email to the ceo team stating;-

 

On reading the outcome of the cisas case, i have today, under duress made a payment in full of # on your online system which i believe is the full amount of the bill.

 

Please be clear i have paid this money for only one reason and that is to avoid a default on my credit file or any arrears as i am am due to apply for a mortgage and do not want to taint my credit history.

 

I do not in any way accept that any monies are owed to virgin media as i cancelled all my services last year and have not used them since.

 

Please be aware i intend to file a claim in the county courts for the return of this money with costs added to this.

 

how long do i wait before a formal letter? thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's in the library.

Look for letter before action (I think a link will be formed automatically now).

Adapt the letter to your needs, be very precise, brief and to the point.

Don't drag it too long because as said the have intellectual skills of 6 year old kids.

Post it here and the more experienced caggers will surely correct any mistake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is what im thinking...

 

 

 

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

 

Dear Tom Mockeridge

I write with regards to the unresolved matter of virgin media billing me for services i had cancelled in april 2013 after which i started my new services with sky in may 2013.

Virgin media have continued to bill me by taking direct debits. i was unaware of this due to this being taken from an account which is not my regualar account.

 

As soon as i was aware of this, i contacted your customer services. A record of this i have on my phone bills which not surprisingly you do not have.

 

i once again attempted to sort this with your customer services, which again was pointless.

 

I further attempted resolution by contacting yourselves - again this didnt help.

 

i once again tried to sort the matter out and approached cisas but this again deemed fruitless. i did not even get an explanation of why the bill amounts were varying since i had not been in contact in over a year.

 

i have under duress today, paid the sum in full of £930.15 on your online service. I have simply done this to avoid getting a default or arrears on my account or credit history. please be clear i do not owe you any money and accept no liability whatsoever for the amount i paid you.

Any attempt to place arrears on my credit history or a default which would affect my mortgage application plans will be added to court letters.

 

Therefore i am giving you 14 days to refund my money of £930.15 in full.

 

Failure to do this will result in court action plus costs of 8% interest per annum and further costs.

 

I await your response.

 

 

 

 

apologies im not very good at letter writing. what do you guys think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A letter before claim should be self-standing. It is fine to refer to other documents, but someone who knows nothing about your case should still be able to read the letter and understand what your claim is about.

 

I think you should begin your letter with a short, clear summary of what has happened and why you want VM to refund this money. This can repeat to some extent what you already told CISAS.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am struggling with this and have tried to edit the original with the cisas email bits and would really like to send it tonight. i have paid on my credit card so hopefully it will be sorted before that is due. could someone please help me with this? im not good at letter writing and am struggling to make it sound formal. thanks guys

 

I write with regards to the unresolved matter of virgin media billing me for services i had cancelled in april 2013 after which i started my new services with sky in may 2013.

 

Virgin media have continued to bill me by taking direct debits. i was unaware of this due to this being taken from an account which is not my regualar account.

my sky services of tv, phone line and broadband started on may 23 2013 as evidenced by actual bills

 

A letter and phonecall of cancellation giving 30 days notice was given to vm in April 2013. This is denied by vm. However, I have evidence from mobile phone bill where I have called vm recently when I realised this issue and when asked about the notes on the account from my call, I have been told there is no record. This I believe is also the case with my cancellation -no record of my recent call and no record of my cancellation.

 

I cannot understand why vm would think I would have their services active when I have purchased high speed broadband, the top television package with sky and a landline whereas the package I had before cancellation with vm was a basic package. This makes no sense.

My email address is active and is checked several times a day. Never in all this time have I received any emails from virgin media let alone any bills. Had I received bills, I would have actioned this sooner.

 

 

As soon as i was aware of this, i contacted your customer services. A record of this i have on my phone bills which not surprisingly you do not have.

 

i once again attempted to sort this with your customer services, which again was pointless.

 

I further attempted resolution by contacting yourselves - again this didnt help.

 

i once again tried to sort the matter out and approached cisas but this again deemed fruitless. i did not even get an explanation of why the bill amounts were varying since i had not been in contact in over a year.

 

i have under duress today, paid the sum in full of £930.15 on your online service. I have simply done this to avoid getting a default or arrears on my account or credit history. please be clear i do not owe you any money and accept no liability whatsoever for the amount i paid you.

Any attempt to place arrears on my credit history or a default which would affect my mortgageicon application plans will be added to court letters.

 

Therefore i am giving you 14 days to refund my money of £930.15 in full.

 

Failure to do this will result in court action plus costs of 8% interesticon per annum and further costs.

 

I await your response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the other thing is i made the payment online yesterday and have not recieved a confirmation email despite putting my email in. i have checked my blocked list and junk and nothing on there.....

 

been on vm online chat and they have recived the pymt. there are no arrears on teh account and no default. phew. just strange how i dont have their emails??? not even their payment confirmation. have checked through junk and blocked - nothing there at all.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few revisions:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Letter before claim

This is a formal letter before claim written under the Practice Direction for Pre-Action Conduct.

 

I cancelled all my services with Virgin Media in April 2013, as I decided to move my business to Sky. A letter and phonecall of cancellation giving 30 days notice was given to Virgin Media in April 2013.

 

However, Virgin Media has continued to bill me by taking direct debits. I was unaware of this due to the money being taken from an account which is not my regualar account. My email address is active and is checked several times a day. Never in all this time have I received any emails from virgin media let alone any bills.

 

My sky services of tv, phone line and broadband started on 23 May 2013 as evidenced by actual bills which you have already seen.

 

I have tried to resolve this through customer services and CISAS, which has proved fruitless. I have not even received an explanation of why the bill amounts vary given that I had not been in contact in over a year.

 

I had originally instructed my bank to reverse the direct debit. I have today paid the sum of £930.15 through your online service. I have simply done this to avoid getting a default or arrears on my account or credit history, given that I am currently applying for a mortgage. Please be clear that I do not accept that this money is owed and that my payment does not constitute any admission of liability.

 

Given the above, unless you are now prepared to resolve this by refunding the £930.15, I feel that I have no choice but to proceed with court action against you. I intend to claim the full amount of £930.15 which I had been charged after cancelling my services, plus interest at the standard rate of 8% per annum and costs.

 

Please provide a full written response within 14 days. Unless I receive a satisfactory response within 14 days, I intend to issue a claim without further reference to you.

 

Yours faithfully

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks so much for the letter. i sent it yesterday evening and already got a reply today. it dont look like im getting my money back. :( this is the reply i got.

 

Thank you for your email. As is our process when a customer contacts CISAS the final decision is then made by them. CISAS made their decision which you will have been advised of that no further action is needed by Virgin Media

 

I have attached a copy of the letter that I have sent you. I am very sorry that we could not reach an amicable resolution.

 

This is the attachment:-

 

I have now received confirmation from CISAS about your complaint and they’ve given us their final decision.

 

The final decision states that no further action is needed, so I am therefore writing to make sure you know we’ve closed your case on our systems, which means no changes have been made to your account.

 

At Virgin Media, we want all our customers to be happy, so we’re sorry that we let you down. We’re also disappointed that we could not reach an amicable resolution.

 

We now consider this complaint closed.

 

 

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

 

Gutted. Has upset my whole day. what do you think guys?

Link to post
Share on other sites

County court claim.

They're using their usual big boys bully tactics to scare you.

Cisas decision has no legal weight because as said they're paid by VM.

Remember to send an email/letter to cisas rejecting their decision.

Again, the main point of your claim is that you called to cancel the services and VM admitted to that, but they claim that you cancelled only the landline.

The judge will be asking who in their right frame of mind would call to cancel just one service when the others are not needed.

Take them on, they're just in business to rip people off and everyone knows that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i emailed cisas to let them know there decsion was rejected and i did get acknowledgement from them. this is what it said:-

 

We acknowledge receipt of notification from the Claimant that they are formally rejecting the Decision made by the Adjudicator in the above matter.

Under the rules of CISAS the Claimant is entitled to reject the Decision if they are unhappy with the outcome, and start action afresh elsewhere. Accordingly, I write to confirm that as the Decision in this case has been rejected it will not become binding upon the company.

 

The Claimant is now free to pursue their claim in the courts or elsewhere, and as stated in the guidance notes, it is advised that the advice of the Citizens Advice or a solicitor is

sought before taking the matter further.

 

vm are saying that they had a call from another company to port the number the number to another provider and not from me....

 

do you think i can win this case? would i need to attend court? whats the chances they may settle before court?

 

what baffles me is i still not had a payment reciept on email despite providing my email for the full amount i paid last week. as i said i went on the online chat and yes its been paid and payment recieved but still no reciept. i do no have it on my blocked list or junk. its liek theyve blocked emails to me or something.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you think i can win this case?

Personally I think you'd have a good chance but I don't think it is guaranteed.

 

would i need to attend court?

Unless VM settled, you would need to attend a short hearing at your local county court. You may refer to http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?356814-The-Process-of-Litigation..-Court-Claims-Defences for more information.

 

whats the chances they may settle before court?

I think the chances are very high. Companies like VM hate being taken to court, and there is a cost associated with sending someone to defend the case which they should not be able to recover even if they win.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

vm are saying that they had a call from another company to port the number the number to another provider and not from me....

 

But reading your earlier posts I recollect you having written confirmation from VM that you called them to cancel the landline and port the number.

Is this correct?

If so, the chances of winning are very high, but as said, never guaranteed 100%.

If you have VM confirmation that you called to cancel the landline and then they lied to cisas by claiming that you didn't, you can point this out in your court claim and it would be very good evidence of their wrongdoing.

Steampowered is right, most likely they will settle out of court.

Imo they will offer you half of the money first, but I would refuse and take a slight risk.

Don't be surprised that you still don't get VM email, it's one of their old tricks.

Have you saved and printed the online chat conversation?

Not that it's really needed because the transaction would be on your bank statement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i did call them to cancel and write a letter but they have no proof of this. they said initially on the online chat that i had called to have the number ported, then someone else said another company had called to have the number ported.

 

i really hope so. Feel so stressed about it. yes iv got the payment transaction- i also paid it on credit card.

 

not recieveing a payment email shows i dont get their emails. i check my emails on my phone regulary.

 

just on the money claim website seeing what i need to do...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got proof that you called them to cancel?

I.e. Admission by VM via email, printout of online chat, telephone bill, recorded delivery slip?

If not, then the case is more complicated because they can claim that you never cancelled and the were contacted by sky to port the number.

Money is owed to you on the day you transferred the £900 odd back to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no i have no proof. i dont have that mobile phone anymore that i called and no other written proof sad.gif

 

i think that is what they are claiming that another company i.e sky called to port the number.

 

feeling worried sad.gif

 

Can you contact the network provider of that mobile phone and ask for the relevant bill?

Sorry to say, but without proof that you cancelled VM has got a better chance to do a number on you.

They are a bunch of voltures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...