Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard & Mkdp help please!


scoobydoo54
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3534 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I will apologise for my spelling and grammar in advance as I'm dyslectic

 

Back in June 2005 I took out a Barclaycard on a 0% offer and transferred my HSBC Balance of £1056 on to the card

 

 

within a few months I became unwell giving birth to my Daughter and had to give up my job,

I ended up missing a couple of payments and

 

 

I telephoned Barclaycard and explained my situation and asked if the missed payments could be added back to the balance

and I could then manage to stick to the monthly payments ..

 

 

I was refused any help and worse advised that due to the missed payments that they had now removed the 0% offer

so my next payment would include 2 missed payments, interest, charges + the next months payments.

 

 

After this I never got back on track

 

 

I did however stick to making regular payments but could not afford to clear the arrears and charges

so each month I was getting charges for missed payments on top of the balance.

 

 

over the years the debt was passed between their in house collectors and back to them but

 

 

every time I carried on making a payment each month and asking for help but never got any.

 

In 2012 I added up that I had received over £950 in charges + Interest on top & I had paid over £1200 off of the balance.

 

 

Due to this I decided enough was enough I allegedly still owed Barclaycard over £1351...

 

 

stopped making payments and sent them a letter explaining the issues I had had over the years

and pointed out that I had more than paid back the balance I had transferred to them in 2005

and there was only a balance of £1,352,79 owing due to the fact that they had refused to help me

when I had started to struggle 7 years previous.

 

 

At the time I had managed to save £600 and offered to pay this to them in full and final settlement of the account

which they refused in a final response letter.

 

 

After that I did not contact Barclaycard again.

 

17th April 2014

- I received a letter addressed to myself from a company called Mkdp saying they had brought an account

and balance and I should contact them! It didn't say who the debt was owed to or how much it was for so I just ignored it

 

28th April 2014 - Received a letter from mkdp saying they had not received an offer of payment,

with a payment slip attached saying Barclaycard & £1,352.79

 

14th May 2014 - Letter received from mkdp stating still not received offer from myself

 

28th may 2014 - Letter received from mkdp stating still not received offer from myself

 

17th June 2014 - Final Notice from mkdp (£1,352,79)

 

25th June 2014 - I sent a request for a CCA & a £1 postal order direct to Compello Group (Recorded delivery signed for 27th June)

 

4th July 2014 - Response received - Balance showing the postal order had been deducted from the balance ! (£1,351,79)

"Unfortunately, at this time we are unable to fulfil your request" ..

... "We will contact you as soon as we receive the documents you requested"

 

?? July 2014 - Received another final notice with 7 days to act (cant find it now to add the details)

 

5th August 2014 - Final Response received (£1,351,79) stating that I had requested the CCA by telephone..

. I've never once spoke to them !!!

I've added a pdf with a copy of this response including a version of the alleged agreement (the first 2 pages of the letter are at the end

 

26th August 2014 - Letter received from Raven (£1,351,79)

"Owing to you not having a payment arrangement in place with mk rapid recoveries

they have instructed us to collect the outstanding balance you have with them"

 

I'm stuck now what do I do next ????

 

 

Thank you in advance for any help

Edited by scoobydoo54
pdf not showing ?
Link to post
Share on other sites

raven are MKDP in sheeps clothing

 

 

until/unless they reply to the CCA request

they are stuck.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you'll get nothing more out of BC

 

 

that's what they deem as a CCA return

 

 

they'll need the signed agreement

those T&C's are from various times

 

 

sorry I didn't see you post count.

 

 

MKDP are a DCA

they are not bailiffs

and

have no such legal powers

 

 

if you have all the statements

 

 

have a look at a few BC threads here

 

 

and get reclaiming all those penalty charges

and PPI if you have it too.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Scooby and welcome to CAG

 

You need to read other threads here where CAGgers have reclaimed their charges plus compound restitutionary interest. See success threads here :-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?421662-BC-penalty-charges-probably-**WON**-with-compound-interest**

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?309037-Charges-older-than-6-years-***WON***-Compound-Int-t-and-**NO-SET-OFF**

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?368541-trancyb-vs-Barclaycard-probably-**WON**-with-Compound-Int-t

 

Take time to read and understand the reclaiming process.

 

List all your penalty charges (but not any interest) on a compound interest spreadsheet and let us know what the totals are roughly for charges and for interest.

 

Then we can see how these figures compare with the a/c balance.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...