Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowells/Vodafone chasing debt from 1999 but default appears dated 2012


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3562 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

 

I have recently been contacted by Lowells on behalf of Vodafone regarding payment for an account that was active from 1997-1999.

 

 

According to Vodafone collections, the last payment made was on the 30th June 1999, the subsequent payment did not clear due to no funds being available.

 

 

I have been informed that 13 years later, on 4th September 2012, another attempt was made to take a payment (I'm not sure why there was no activity in the intervening 13 years), at which point a default was served on my account.

 

 

My issue is this - I have no problem paying a debt that I owe, although dispute the fact that my credit report will be flagged with a non-payment from 2012 (thus affecting my credit score) rather than from 1999 as there has been absolutely no activity on the account in these past 15 years.

 

 

Lowell inform me that the debt does not classify as statute barred due to the 2012 notice - as mentioned, I have no issue with paying a debt that I owe and do not intend to try to avoid payment, other than the issue with the date of the notice which in my eyes seems unreasonable due to the timescales involved and the account being dormant for 15 years.

 

 

After such a long time, I have no records or recollection of this account (and have moved house 4 times since), and Vodafone are unable to explain why the default was served after such a long interval. Their only advice is to write a letter to Vodafone QA, which I suspect will take quite a while to resolve and in the meantime Lowells will be attempting to reclaim their debt.

 

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated - is there any way that I can have the date of the default modified such that it doesn't affect my credit rating?

 

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

its statute barred

 

 

end of

a period of more that 6yrs existed.

once barred - always barred.

nothing can undo that not even a judge.

 

 

the default should be removed too

and the account wiped from the CRA file

 

 

we have a rep here

 

 

please follow below and post back the number

 

 

We thought it would be nice to introduce ourselves and to assure you all that our presence on CAG is with the very best of intentions.

vodafone UK has recently introduced a dedicated Web Relations Team which is keen to seek out customers who’re having difficulties with their accounts and feel that they have no other place to turn to than CAG and other consumer forums and blogs.

Naturally, it’s not possible for us to help directly with account specific queries on CAG and as such we would encourage those members who feel we can help them to contact us privately at [email protected] quoting ‘WRT135 – CAG Forum’ in the subject line.

When emailing us we would also ask that you either provide us with a link to your post or thread – if you’ve posted in another member’s thread please also provide your CAG username so that we can check what your query is.

Many thanks

 

Web Relations Team

Vodafone UK.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Welcome to CAG.

 

 

As far as I can see Lowell are totally wrong.

 

 

If no payment was actually made the debt is statute barred, But if VF did not default the account in 1999 and left the account dormant until 2012 and the attempted a take a payment and then when it failed defaulted they are correct.

 

 

What I don't understand is why VF waited all that time to try to take the payment.

 

 

Have you actually checked your credit ref. files now?

 

 

Looking closer I think Lowell are working on the theory of the BMW Finance - v- Hart case where it was decided that on Hire Purchase debt the Limitation Period did not start until the debt was defaulted.

 

 

The VF debt is not HP or as secured loan so it is irrelevant.

 

 

May I suggest sending something along the lines of:

 

 

Ms Sara de Tute,

Director of Legal & Compliance

The Lowell Group

Ellington House

9 Savannah Way

Leeds Valley Park

Leeds

LS10 1AB

 

 

Date:

 

 

Lowell Ref:xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

Dear Ms de Tute,

 

 

Statute Barred Debt:

 

 

I refer you recent correspondence from Lowell regarding an alleged debt arising from an account with Vodafone.

 

 

I do not acknowledge any such debt to Lowell or any company it may claim to represent.

This alleged debt is statute barred and I will not make any payment.

 

 

Lowell has stated in a letter dated xx.xx.xxxx that the alleged debt is not statute barred because Vodafone did not default the account from which the alleged debt has arisen until xx.xx.xxxx 2012.

 

 

As you will be well aware the limitation period for a debt arising from a simple contract starts from the date when a contractual payment was due but not made, after which no further payment was ever made, which is the case with this alleged debt.

 

 

For clarification the alleged debt is statute barred and I will not make any payment or offer of payment now or in the future.

 

 

Amend/add/delete as you feel fit if you want to use this.

 

 

Lowell have back down before when this approach has been used.

 

 

Send by signed for post, check delivery date.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for the quick replies! I'll follow up on the link you provided dx100uk.

 

 

>>Have you actually checked your credit ref. files now?

Brigadier, I have just checked Experian and don't see any mention of a default which is confusing (as both Vodafone and Lowells have told me that one was served in December 2012). Unable to check with Noddle as the site seems down, but maybe the Vodafone relations team can help shed some light on the matter.

 

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for the quick replies! I'll follow up on the link you provided dx100uk.

 

 

>>Have you actually checked your credit ref. files now?

Brigadier, I have just checked Experian and don't see any mention of a default which is confusing (as both Vodafone and Lowells have told me that one was served in December 2012). Unable to check with Noddle as the site seems down, but maybe the Vodafone relations team can help shed some light on the matter.

 

 

Thanks!

 

 

 

You're most welcome.

 

 

There is something very wrong with this is there no record on the CRAS and Lowell are claiming a default was placed a long time after the payments ceased it seems to me the default has "fallen off" the CRA files as would expected, but someone is attempting to create a new one.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're most welcome.

There is something very wrong with this is there no record on the CRAS and Lowell are claiming a default was placed a long time after the payments ceased it seems to me the default has "fallen off" the CRA files as would expected, but someone is attempting to create a new one.

 

 

So I thought I'd try checking with Equifax as when I checked the other day both Noddle and Experian were clean, and I found the following entry (sorry for the bad formatting):

 

Communications Supplier from Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd (I) / XXXXX6066

Name -------------------------

Date of Birth ------------

Terms 0 @ £ 0 (Monthly)

Status Defaulted

Current Balance £ 74

Start Balance £ 0

Credit Limit £ 0

Default / Delinquent Balance £ 74

Start Date 27/09/1998

Date Updated 27/08/2014

Date Last Delinquent

Date Satisfied

Default Date 02/02/2013

Payment History

This table shows how you have kept your account over time, for information about individual months pass your mouse cursor over the coloured block

J F M A M J J A S O N D

2013 D

 

Has this just been created by Lowells, or is this the default that Vodafone apparently created (it's not in the name of Vodafone, and seems to have been modified the day before they replied to my email where I suggested that I believed this to be statute barred) - or maybe I'm just being paranoid. There's no payment history at all in the entry, other than the one default of Feb 2013 (all of my other accounts have years of history, this has just one entry).

 

As I mentioned earlier, the actual date where the last payment was made was in 1999 (and the start date is wrong, apparently this was July 1997).

 

Any insight into what's going on here, and how I can get the information I need to correct the information (or at least find out what on earth is going on with an account that hasn't been touched for 15+ years).

 

I've had little success with Vodafone after speaking with them several times (have emailed the weblink provided above yesterday, although no reply just yet, guess as it's the weekend - although I do see there's an alternative link to the web relations team that maybe I should use instead?).

 

I guess to put this correct (i.e. change the default date to the correct one) I need Vodafone to provide me with full payment history, and they weren't very helpful in this regard (one lady even said that records weren't available because I was transferred from an old billing system to a new one).

 

Would I be right in thinking that the crux of the matter is why Vodafone attempted to take a payment after so many years, and does this mean that the default is legitimate (and Lowells are correct in saying it's not statute barred), or should it in fact be dated as the time of the first missed payment (so homehow I need to contest this and get it corrected to the right date, and the default removed)?

Edited by CreativeLemming
...bad formastting (still bad...) + remove paranoia
Link to post
Share on other sites

So I thought I'd try checking with Equifax as when I checked the other day both Noddle and Experian were clean, and I found the following entry (sorry for the bad formatting):

 

Communications Supplier from Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd (I) / XXXXX6066

Name -------------------------

Date of Birth ------------

Terms 0 @ £ 0 (Monthly)

Status Defaulted

Current Balance £ 74

Start Balance £ 0

Credit Limit £ 0

Default / Delinquent Balance £ 74

Start Date 27/09/1998

Date Updated 27/08/2014

Date Last Delinquent

Date Satisfied

Default Date 02/02/2013

Payment History

This table shows how you have kept your account over time, for information about individual months pass your mouse cursor over the coloured block

J F M A M J J A S O N D

2013 D

 

Has this just been created by Lowells, or is this the default that Vodafone apparently created (it's not in the name of Vodafone, and seems to have been modified the day before they replied to my email where I suggested that I believed this to be statute barred) - or maybe I'm just being paranoid. There's no payment history at all in the entry, other than the one default of Feb 2013 (all of my other accounts have years of history, this has just one entry).

 

As I mentioned earlier, the actual date where the last payment was made was in 1999 (and the start date is wrong, apparently this was July 1997).

 

Any insight into what's going on here, and how I can get the information I need to correct the information (or at least find out what on earth is going on with an account that hasn't been touched for 15+ years).

 

I've had little success with Vodafone after speaking with them several times (have emailed the weblink provided above yesterday, although no reply just yet, guess as it's the weekend - although I do see there's an alternative link to the web relations team that maybe I should use instead?).

 

I guess to put this correct (i.e. change the default date to the correct one) I need Vodafone to provide me with full payment history, and they weren't very helpful in this regard (one lady even said that records weren't available because I was transferred from an old billing system to a new one).

 

Would I be right in thinking that the crux of the matter is why Vodafone attempted to take a payment after so many years, and does this mean that the default is legitimate (and Lowells are correct in saying it's not statute barred), or should it in fact be dated as the time of the first missed payment (so homehow I need to contest this and get it corrected to the right date, and the default removed)?

 

 

 

I am immediately suspicious of the default date here.

 

 

I think a call to VF (no harm in this now it's owned by Lowell to find out if this very, very late default is genuine.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am immediately suspicious of the default date here.

 

 

I think a call to VF (no harm in this now it's owned by Lowell to find out if this very, very late default is genuine.

 

 

 

Well, I have called them 3 times in total - I was told that the last payment was made on 30/06/1999, and they tried to take a payment 13 years later on 04/09/2012 - however, they had no explanation as to why there was such a large delay between the two dates - one advisor said they'd not seen something like this before (then simply transferred me to their billing team who they said should be able to assist me further, but in practice just wanted to take a payment), the other said something about the account being transferred from some very old billing system to a new one. Neither could understand why this payment attempt was made at this time, nor could answer any of my questions about the validity of the default date so I'm kind of stuck in limbo here :-( Nobody I spoke to could answer any questions about any default on my credit file.

 

 

Just re-read your previous post where you say this isn't HP so the 'default date' rule doesn't apply - if the default date is genuine, but the actual missed payment/activity date is 13 years ago, then does your advice to send the letter still apply and the recommended route, or do I need to take some action direct with VF (or dispute the default with the credit report agency), or just accept that this is the date they've decided to mark as the default and live with the consequences?

 

 

I'm convinced that the default date isn't representative of the actual date, but don't know who to turn to to correct/investigate this.

 

 

(btw, thanks for all the invaluable advice, a donation to CAG will certainly be on it's way as way of thanks...)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I have called them 3 times in total - I was told that the last payment was made on 30/06/1999, and they tried to take a payment 13 years later on 04/09/2012 - however, they had no explanation as to why there was such a large delay between the two dates - one advisor said they'd not seen something like this before (then simply transferred me to their billing team who they said should be able to assist me further, but in practice just wanted to take a payment), the other said something about the account being transferred from some very old billing system to a new one. Neither could understand why this payment attempt was made at this time, nor could answer any of my questions about the validity of the default date so I'm kind of stuck in limbo here :-( Nobody I spoke to could answer any questions about any default on my credit file.

 

 

Just re-read your previous post where you say this isn't HP so the 'default date' rule doesn't apply - if the default date is genuine, but the actual missed payment/activity date is 13 years ago, then does your advice to send the letter still apply and the recommended route, or do I need to take some action direct with VF (or dispute the default with the credit report agency), or just accept that this is the date they've decided to mark as the default and live with the consequences?

 

 

I'm convinced that the default date isn't representative of the actual date, but don't know who to turn to to correct/investigate this.

 

 

(btw, thanks for all the invaluable advice, a donation to CAG will certainly be on it's way as way of thanks...)

 

 

Emm one would have to conclude that either Lowell have recreated the default date and or this has been " managed" between Lowell and VF because of a long forgotten debt,

 

 

Please give me time to re-read everything I'm sure there is a lot more to this than meets the eye.

 

 

I am sure CAG will much appreciate the donation my thanks on CAGs behalf.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

get lee onboard

he's sort numerous issues like this

 

 

did you follow that link I gave you and get a number back.

 

 

don't assume the rest of VF support are like lee

 

 

they are not

 

 

he'll get it sorted

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...