Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • tobyjugg2
      Should we trust Sunak or the next PM to fix the Country's problems? (title revised 24/10/22)

      By tobyjugg2 · Posted

      So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have they actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Restart
      Letter before Action - Negotiation not going well

      By Restart · Posted

      Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hikertrash
      MET CCTV PNC - Starbucks closed- Southgate Park, Stansted CM24 1PY

      By Hikertrash · Posted

      Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Mdg123
      Private parking charge from Euro Car Parks now with Debt Recovery Plus

      By Mdg123 · Posted

      Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
    • bruv1
      Trying to find contact details for prime credit 5 S.a.r.l

      By bruv1 · Posted

      Am in the middle of selling my house but it's been held up as still showing a change on the property from welcome finance, have not had any contact from them for years or prime credit and need this sorting asap

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All
Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

MKDP claimform for Barclaycard 'debt'*** Claim Dismissed***

tigger74

By tigger74
in Legal Successes

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3143 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

tigger74

tigger74

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I have managed to find out some interesting bits. lets see what people think.

 

 

The original BC agreement was in pre Dec some time back , im sure was an application of some sort.

 

 

In and around some year,lol I filled out another peace of paper and was upgraded. I have the letter which says something :) in the wordings. it has modified agreement, something about terms of agreement remain unchanged.

 

 

who knows the limits.

 

 

Just modified this bit Andy ;p never know who reads forums.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted

Dont feed history to the assignee....remember he is not aware of any details...apart from the account number your address and a balance.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
tigger74

tigger74

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just update , Has been allocated to my local court. at my request :)

 

 

Waiting for the judge to give directions and time scales really on the draft directions, and funny heard not a dickie bird from MKDP. even with my draft directions and questions I sent them in a nice letter they have not replied to.....

 

 

Tigs

Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted

Have you not received your Notice of Allocation?...normally the directions are contained within said notice once a claim is transferred tigger.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
tigger74

tigger74

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Nope Andy, just got notice of transfer letter at this moment.

 

 

Just says has been referred to procedural judge who will allocate the claim, please wait the judges directions.... that was 21st October 2014..

Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted

Righty oh....just post once you are in receipt tigger.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
tigger74

tigger74

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Finally had response back from court, the judge has decided that this should be seen in small claims court on the 10th February.

 

 

Judge is saying the value is just over the 10k but the issues are not complex.

 

 

MKDP,They have to pay by the 19th December the fee...

 

 

All documents need to be exchanged not less than 14 days before the 10th February 2015..

 

 

so I figure that is post off recorded delivery by the 26th January?

 

 

Still nothing back in relation to the 3 letters sent to Mkdp... cca, cpr, draft....

 

 

Tigs

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
tigger74

tigger74

Posted
  • Author
Posted

All my documents went off to court and Mkdp on 21st January 2015, the date for 14 days before was on 26th January latest.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seems that MKDP have sent there statements and documents in, but not sent me one thing.....

 

 

 

 

Surprise that one... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted

Advise Northampton tigger..inform them that the claimant has failed to comply with directions...ask them to issue an " or else " general order.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
tigger74

tigger74

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Informed the court and sent MDKP an email.

 

Saying they are in default for the required directions before the court date,

and that I would request for the action to be struck out on non compliance.

 

Surprise today 24 hrs later,

 

 

I have email with 121 pages so they are 7 days late on producing documents for a start.

 

Right can someone help look through this lot?

 

 

think they don't have as strong a case as they think...

 

Lot of holes in the documents :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
dx100uk

dx100uk

Posted
Posted

scan up what you think is the agreement.

 

 

but ofcourse unless they produce the signed one from 1999 they're stuffed

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
tigger74

tigger74

Posted
  • Author
Posted

As they filed late not 14 days before but 5 will be going for the strike out route first of all, rofl this made me laugh even more. the third page after this is the same address and a bold wording as follows:

 

 

YOUR RIGHT TO CANCEL: Once you have signed this agreement, you will have for a short time a right to cancel it. exact details of how and when you can do this will be sent to you by post by us.

 

 

 

 

Rofl obvious the mistake... not on headed paper like the first two pages...

Link to post
Share on other sites
tigger74

tigger74

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I filed an objection on Friday under the pleb gate case, asking for the application to be struck out and found in my favour, and also pointing out that ultimately 61,65, 127(3) would apply. The court cannot enforce the application. hand delivered this with the clerk signing the documents for me which the judge will be looking at today before tomorrows court date

 

 

Mkdp did reply to their email with the attached documents, but on another email claiming staff sickness for the late submission. would ask for the court to allow the late submission,

 

 

what a poor excuse....

Link to post
Share on other sites
tigger74

tigger74

Posted
  • Author
Posted

That's what I thought, so claiming a debt is sold on the 11th July 2013 to Mkdp.

 

 

Then the reply to cca request form Barclays dated 15 September 2014 has gone up by £409.

And Barclays are still claiming the status of account, the full outstanding balance is now due......

 

 

Is this a lie being told and who owns the debt, and why has it gone up if sold?

 

 

Tigs

Link to post
Share on other sites
oleg

oleg

Posted
Posted

I'm afraid Barclays often post those misleading statements about amounts due as if they still own the account , long after assignment. But I'm unaware of anyone having reported them to the regulators for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
tigger74

tigger74

Posted
  • Author
Posted

just going through my points for tomorrows hearing, cant stop laughing at some of the rubbish...

 

 

Mkdp claim they received the cca information after the ..nd of September and sent it after this date. rofl muppets have date stamped it ..th Is it the devil in the detail rofl

Link to post
Share on other sites
oleg

oleg

Posted
Posted

I wouldn't be pointing out any other ridiculous boo boos here at this stage if I were you. You never know who's watching. On the other hand , they may already have tangled themselves in enough knots to be hanged by.

 

Look at @willintonboots's two threads where the judge sent them out of court today with their tail between their legs.

 

But if you discover more gems by all means report after. We all enjoy a comedy.

Link to post
Share on other sites
dx100uk

dx100uk

Posted
Posted

look at user willintonboots user-offline.png

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
tigger74

tigger74

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Right bad day,

 

 

I won in that the poor documentation form MKDP meant they could not enforce the debt.

 

But and its the big but, as the amount is large. the Judge has allowed them 4 weeks to correct the document failures and re-submit..

 

 

..Once they correct the non compliances issues, should we say get the white rabbit out

. im stuffed according to the judge and the debt will be enforced by the courts :(

 

He let them off the late serving of documents as well, and the incorrect documents because of the value of claim...

 

Once they send in the modified documents, I have to agree to what ever they put forward...

... stuffed, rofl was worth a go

Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted

Well they have had 6 months up to now and couldnt get it right...4 more weeks will not necessarily produce a white rabbit.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...