Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, I'm wondering if someone can advise me on something. I'm appealing an order and have been asked to submit an appeal bundle and the below points are required to be included: 1) transcript of the judgment of the lower court on other record of reasons.  2) Statement of case. I'm wondering if anyone knows that "on other record of reasons" means. Also for statement of case would it just be a long document covering the reason for the claim, the findings of the lower court, why it was wrong and what I seek instead?   Thanks,
    • Hello, Thanks for the advice. I asserted my rights to reject and they accepted it and said they will refund me the full amount.  My question now is how long do they usually take to collect the vehicle? I've made it clear that I'm available for them to collect it whenever and I've been told its been passed on to the collections team. I chased it up today as its also raining heavily at the moment.  I just wondered if anyone had any experience on how long they usually take to collect? I'd obviously like it collected as soon as possible as I need to purchase another car.  Is it likely they will drag on the process of collection and what can I do if they do?  Thanks!
    • Why are FCA’s “name and shame” proposals causing a stir?View the full article
    • I am coming back to this thread after receiving a Single envelope containing 2 letters: 1 from Max Recovery telling me that my account was transferred to Drydens Fairfax in 2007 1 from Drydens Fairfax telling me that they are under instruction from their client to seek repayment.   These relate to a Barclays Overdraft from the early 00s, last payment through PayPlan was 04 June 2019, but neither of the letters are from Barclays themselves.   I have informed Drydens in both May 2019 and June 2023 of changes of address. No letters beyond a confirmation of the change and a request for finanical details have been received, which ive ignored.   What i was wanting to know is do i just ignore these as per previous advice? I know that i cant CCA an overdraft debt but what is the usual "plan" for dealing with old overdraft debts? Am i trying to run the clock down until June 2025 when it becomes statue barred?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Indemnity insurance for house sale


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3542 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was wondering if anyone has been asked/required to take out indemnity insurance on a house sale. Apparently, the house has an old convenant, (not pointed out by our solicitors 10 years ago, but too late to do anything about now), that restricts changing the appearance of the property.

 

Our solicitor says that having upvc windows installed constitutes a change of appearance and that I can either apply for retrospective approval from the housing association or take out indemnity insurance. The catch is if I apply to the housing association, it can take X amount of time and may (only may) cost money - but that if I do so I would no longer be eligible for indemnity insurance.

 

Most of the street has had replacement windows. I have tried to find out from the housing association what the process is, but other than saying that asking in advance incurs no cost, (too late for that) they do not reply. Logic would suggest that retrospective permission would also be straightforward and free, but council/housing associations are often not logical.

 

In ten years the covenant has not been enforced, but that does not assuage the fears of the buyer's solicitors. If only our solicitor had been so conscientious.

 

I've only ever taken out insurance for a set period - for my house or car - so how does indemnity insurance work for houses when you just don't know if or when it will ever be claimed against?

 

What kind of premium are people paying?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Yes I took out indemnity insurance when I sold my house. It cost about £100 if I remember and was paid for in the solicitors fees. It really is quite common

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

These indemnity insurances are relatively recent to my knowledge. So they might not have been available when you bought the property.

 

The policy would cover the new owner in the event that the housing association took action in relation to the coventant. This might be more of an issue with a block of flats, but I cannot see them taking action in regard a house, as long as the appearance was not significantly changed. The policy is a one premium for as long as the new owners owned the house.

 

You would probably be best to pay the buyers solicitors the £100 and they can arrange the policy.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fletch70 and unclebulgaria67

Thank you for your replies. Well, even though it sounds money for old rope, I guess I have no choice. At least it's not as expensive as I thought.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe have a word with your solicitor and ask him the price. I would only be doing it if the buyers solicitor asked for it . If they don't and as long as you answer any questions truthfully you would be in the clear.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Yes I took out indemnity insurance when I sold my house. It cost about £100 if I remember and was paid for in the solicitors fees. It really is quite common

 

Yup.

 

In conveyancing now everything you can think of is covered by an insurance policy and is standard practice now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I've asked the solicitor for prices. You are right Ganymede, insurance premiums are booming - shame they are so poor when it comes to paying out - there's always that caveat in tiny font, legal-speak, you miss.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...