Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

JSA will be stopped.


yesitsme
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3557 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just a quick update, they have given me a sanction because the advisor said i did not not show proof of my job search so now without any money because of the lies of the advisor, i have shown proof of my job search to the line manager but it has already been stopped, so i have told him that i want a result of this abuse and lies from the advisor in question by friday or i will be contacting the area manager and the local MP by email and highlight the abuse that the staff dish out, will keep you updated as and when. thanks for the words of advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to read that your adviser has decided to pursue you on this. I agree with the others who say that the way you have been treated wrong. Does your Jobseeker’s Agreement say that you must only apply for full time jobs?

 

Now that you have been sanctioned I would urge you to follow the procedure. The letter notifying you of the sanction will inform you of how to ask for a Mandatory Reconsideration and where to send your request. Make sure you do this irrespective of any of the other actions you intend to take.

 

Please remember also to write or contact straight away your local housing benefit office if you get housing benefits etc. They will be notified automatically by the Jobcentre about a change in your circumstances and this notification will automatically stop your housing benefit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lapsed, my JSA do not say anything about part/full time work, i asked the line manager about this and he said you can apply for both so long you are looking for work, so that proves she was making it all up, already sent off for a reconsideration just waiting on them now, thanks for the info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, to get this right, through no fault of your own and on the back of having a pathetic abusive and unhelpful adviser who obviously had to meet his/her sanction targets you get the back end of it for no reason? So muchfor helping people eh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, just had a bad morning with a new advisor at the job centre, handed in my work sheet, and she said is this it a piece of paper why not on UJM, i told her that i always write it down there is no problem with this with the other advisors, she than said she wanted proof of what i had applied for which is no problem i got them all on email on my phone, each date she asked for i had the email, she then got ****ty with me and told me i must show which ones are full time or part time because to claim JSA it must be full time only, do any of you know if this is true. thanks in advance.

 

Doesn't say anything about this in my handbook, she's just trying to put the frighteners on you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Hiya charlotte

 

The next time you see her mention this JSA Regulation. Wave paragraph 190 under her nose, if she gives you any grieff. Tell her you want her manager to explain to you why your advisor is not following DWP regulations.........

 

Paragraph 190 usually shuts up most snotty advisors

 

The extract below is taken from the Availability and Actively Seeking Employment chapter of

the Labour Market Conditions Guide.

 

188. The JSA Regulations do not specify that claimants must keep written records of their job

search. However, encouraging a claimant to keep a written record of the steps they have taken

can help them to remember what they have done, and will help to build up a picture of the

progress the claimant is making in their efforts to find work.

 

189. A claimant may have set up their own records, but if their record keeping is inadequate, or

non-existent encourage them to use the Jobsearch Activity Log (ES4).

 

190. The evidence of jobsearch produced when they attend to have their regular reviews may

be in various forms:

 

 information they have provided from their Universal Jobmatch account;

or

 evidence in writing from employers, employment agencies, or other organisations which

they have contacted;

or

 copies of letters they have sent to employers;

or

 the claimant’s un-corroborated written evidence.

or

 the claimant’s verbal evidence

or

 evidence from previous Jobsearch Reviews recorded on LMS.

 

Clearly the DWP regulations say how you choose to provide your evidence is.... up to you.

 

Print the extract and take it with you.

 

Nimitz

 

Doesn't say anything about this in my handbook, she's just trying to put the frighteners on you.
Edited by Nimitz
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...