Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the reply and clarification, that might just explain why in my case contact has pretty much ceased. Though with such companies it doesn't mean they won't ever threaten to return to court as a tool to force one's hand if they feel they are not self informed on their chances etc.  But concerning how last year they tried to use the CCJ to get a charging order and the court granted an intirum order on our mortgage using the CCJ that would have been a good 2-3 months beyond the 6 years, should the court not have checked the age of the CCJ in the first case or would they always grant an interim order simply off the back of a CCJ being produced without even checking the age of it?.  Had I not defended that action at the time they may well have got a default using a CCJ older than 6 years which could be a concern going forwards. At the time when I contacted the court to question the paperwork for a final order application the clerk suggested people don't get informed when companies apply for interim charging orders, they are automatic if a claimant has a CCJ and people only get contacted once a date for a final order application goes through. kind of begs the question if such companies can continue a seemingly backdoor method to attempt default action if un-defended if the initial application doesn't need to check the age of a CCJ?.
    • Hello!  Wondering if someone can help with this.  I suspect not but worth a go.  I appreciate the "contract is with the seller" line, which is what Evri has fed me but wanted to see if someone with experience in these things could suggest anything else I could do here.  I appreciate there are many topics about lost parcels - My parcels weren't lost, until the driver walked up to my door with them and then decided to make them lost/stolen... I'll summarise what has happened.  Wednesday of last week - Evri delivery driver stole / walked off with 3 of my parcels.  -  Arrived outside my properly, took photos (3 separate photos as its 3 separate deliveries) of the tops of the parcels (pointlessly zoomed in on just the labels, couldn't see anything else, other than a small piece of the pavement and a little weed, which doubly confirms it was outside my door as I can see the same plant), marked the order as delivered and walked off with them.  He's marked on the Evri GPS marked that he was outside.   -  3 different deliveries, from the same company (same boxes etc.), but 3 separate tracking numbers. -  Went through the Evri bot which opened a case on each tracking number.  I then phoned them and left a voicemail explaining what had happened. -  24 hours later had a canned response asking me if the packages had turned up and to check around etc..  I responded explaining again what happened and that they've definitely been taken. -  4 days later,  this morning, I get a response telling me to ask the merchant to refund me. I've responded to this message with a long email, repeating what I said, that I believe the driver has stolen these packages and that he took those suspicious top down shots of the packages, marked them as delivered without ringing or knocking etc.  I've said that I expect them to investigate further, but I gather they won't. In my several messages to them initially and later, I told them I don't care about a refund and wanted the parcels.  They contain some sentimental stuff, nothing of high monetary value, hence me going to this trouble.  I only paid £25 for the contents. I did contact the merchant when this first happened and they asked me to wait a few days.  They ended up refunding me despite me asking them not to and that I wanted them to escalate it with Evri because this appears to be a case of theft.  They didn't seem bothered - Refunded me and told me to go back to Evri and escalate it with them? So - Is there any way to compel Evri to conduct a proper investigation with this driver?  Search for my parcels? I have quite a lot of deliveries handled by Evri (not out of choice) - They used to have a fantastic chap and I rarely had any issues.  He has been replaced by a new guy and I believe the route is handled by this same guy who I believe has taken my packages.  Naturally, I fear this is going to happen again in the future if no investigation occurs. Appreciate any assistance - Thanks for reading. Al.  
    • its not a good thing or a bad thing its ongoing. mines gone the same route. these new notifications are equally meaningless.
    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car broke down after 2.5 weeks please help??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3589 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks again all

 

Ok here's the situation finance company just rang

Basically said they couldn't do anything with the car because we didn't take it to the place where they look at thier cars

 

Consumer Protection and Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 / SOGAlink18.gif states - The consumer is not obliged to return the vehicle to the delear but must make it available for collection.

 

You done more then enough in returning the car.

 

She said the horrible guy my husband dealt with was just a salesman and his attitude towards my husband does not warrant a rejection letter

 

Tell her the car was rejected before the encounter with the salesman, as stated in the letter handed to the salesman.

 

I told her put his attitude and the abise my husband recieved aside the car is faulty she said the dealer couldn't have known the fly wheel had gone and we have to gone them a chance to look at it

 

The dealer should have carried out a pre-sale mechanical inspection, there clearly was a latent fault.

 

I said they had thier chance Saturday when my husband broke diene and called them and they had thier chance Sunday when he arrived with the car both times refused to deal with him

 

Consumer Protection and Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 / SOGA states - The consumer is not obliged to return the vehicle to the delear but must make it available for collection.

I have to ring her back in an hour she wants us to let them look at it see what the faults are I asked could we take it to someone of out choice she sai we have to give them a chance to fix it as they have the means to do so but we can get it independently checked when the work is complete

 

Tell her that you've rejected the vehicle, well within your rights to do so. If they want they can collect the key from you.

 

What do I do? I mentioned my son they didn't seem to care Don't worry, they don't seem to get it.

 

Should I ring CAB or someone? I quotes the SOGA act she said well the law we follow I interrupted her and said no disrespect but you don't have your own law SOGA is the law

 

Please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks again rebel

 

Here we go just rang CAB I was panicking didn't know if you guys were available

 

They said the law I should be quoting is "supply of goods act-hire purchase-implied terms" basically she said the trader has no legal obligation to repair,replace or refund but the finance company do so we pretty much knew that

 

I asked her do I have to let then fix it she said no she said it's all down to negotiation she also said I can claim damages from the finance company for all this

 

All I want is for them to let us have the finance we originally agreed and let is get a car from somewhere else

 

We don't want that car back at all

 

Any thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ring them back when you are ready.

 

Hire purchase agreements are covered by the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973. This says there are implied conditions in a hire purchase agreement, including a condition that the goods will be of satisfactory quality and will be fit for purpose. (Implied conditions are those that can be assumed to be included in the agreement, even if they do not actually appear in writing.)

 

Thanks again rebel

 

Here we go just rang CAB I was panicking didn't know if you guys were available

 

They said the law I should be quoting is "supply of goods act-hire purchase-implied terms" basically she said the trader has no legal obligation to repair,replace or refund but the finance company do so we pretty much knew that

 

I asked her do I have to let then fix it she said no she said it's all down to negotiation she also said I can claim damages from the finance company for all this

 

All I want is for them to let us have the finance we originally agreed and let is get a car from somewhere else

 

We don't want that car back at all

 

Any thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rebel

 

Didn't get anywhere with them she kept saying the problem was a wear and tear item and "things go wrong with cars especially ones that are 7 years old"

 

She asked what would I have done if this had happened 7 months down the line I simple said "it didn't"

 

She has left me with a mobile number of a man at the traders to arrange to collect the key from us

 

She wouldn't even consider rejecting or "recission" the car at all

 

I think I'm going to look round for another finance company this is a nightmare

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi meg&mog

 

1) Tell that you are rejecting the car,

 

2) Regarding the agreement with the Finance Company - the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973 applies. This says there are implied conditions in a hire purchase agreement, including a condition that the goods will be of satisfactory quality and will be fit for purpose,

 

3) Consumer Protection and Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 / SOGA states that the consumer is not obliged to return the vehicle to the dealer but must make it available for collection.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you do not cancel the insurance at this point. If the car is still registered in your name then somebody might decide to cause trouble for you and it will be difficult for you to extract yourself.

 

Are you recording your calls?

 

I think you are at the point now where you had better begin a legal action. Normally speaking you must give 14 days notice before beginning an action – but in this case because of the way it has been going on, I think seven days is more than adequate.

 

Let me say that if you are not prepared to begin a small claim in the County Court then I don't think that they would be very much that you can do other than to take the car and get it repaired at your expense and then drive it. That is the alternative. However, the dealer will then know that he has beaten you and if there are any other faults which emerge in the next few months, the dealer will refuse to take responsibility for those also.

 

I think that you should write letters – and normally speaking-to both the dealer and to the finance company at the same time.

 

I think you need to lay out in bullet pointed chronology exactly what has happened.

 

Make sure that every new incident or conversation is clearly dated so they can see exactly what has progressed.

 

Write your letter to the dealer and inform him that you are going to start a County Court claim under the sale of goods act. Also, write to the finance company in the same way and inform them that you will be bringing a County Court claim against them under the Consumer Credit Act. (Is this correct that you loan which was regulated by the Consumer Credit Act?)

 

At the same time, write a letter to the finance company and tell them that you are making a formal complaint that they are violating their duties under the Consumer Credit Act and that you want the matter brought before the ombudsman. Let me warn you, that normally speaking it is not possible to complain to the ombudsman if the same complaint is being dealt with by the courts. However, you may as well get the process going.

 

Give them each seven days to start dealing with the matter properly and then on the eighth day you must start your County Court claim. We will help you.

 

Once again, don't bluff. If you don't feel up to it then don't start it. However, it is a fairly simple and cheap thing to go about. You will get help on this forum and there is lots of reading material in the various threads and also follow the link to County Court and also the link to small claims.

 

I would suggest that the claim you make is made against each of the parties – the dealer and the finance company jointly so that they become joint defendants in the same case. One of the effects of this will be to concentrate their mind and to force the finance company to start dealing with the dealer. If the finance company start getting angry with the dealer they may threaten him and tell him that they will provide finance his vehicles in the future.

 

In fact in your letter to the dealer you can tell that you will be selling him and the finance company and that you expect the finance company to consider withdrawing their credit facility from him which will affect his future sales.

 

If this line of action interests you then you need to get going tonight and have all the letters in the post tomorrow and then start reading and preparing your claim form. It's not difficult

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

Thanks bank fodder for your help

 

I have rang and stopped the cancellation on the insurance

 

I called CAB back and they are saying I have to go through the route of repair or replacement first before I can reject the car is that right?

 

They also said if I did get the car fixed and I wanted it independantly checked then it would be at our cost

 

I'm now even more confused and bank fodder ?? Are they right?

 

Thanks guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what Her Majestys Government says:

 

You must offer a full refund if an item is faulty, not as described or doesn’t do what it’s supposed to.

 

Customers do have a legal right to a refund, repair or replacement if an item they purchased

does not match the description

is not of satisfactory quality

is not fit for purpose .

 

Each of these circumstances would mean that the item does not conform to contract and therefore it can be described as faulty

 

If the item does not conform to contract (is faulty ) for any of the reasons mentioned previously, and the customer has not accepted the goods, the law says the customer is entitled to

reject the goods and claim a full refund, or

request a repair or replacement if that is the customer's preferred option.

 

As the retailer, you can offer a repair, a replacement or a credit note, but you cannot insist on any one of these. It is the customer's right to receive a full refund in these circumstances.

 

Where a customer is entitled to a full refund because they have not accepted the goods but have agreed that you may repair or replace the goods, they can still claim a full refund if the repair or replacement is

taking an unreasonable time, or

causing an unreasonable inconvenience, or

if the repair or replacement is not satisfactory when they receive it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CAB are wrong. Of course it would be helpful to do things more cooperatively with the dealer, but in this case, because the fault has developed so quickly and appears to be so serious and because the dealer is so unhelpful, I think that you are justified in acting more directly. Of course what you will need is you will need some kind of report confirming your view of the fault.

 

I think that if you get the car repaired then basically you have accepted the car although you could then take legal action simply for the cost of repairs. That would be the second alternative.

 

It would be worth getting an estimate for this anyway in case the issue comes up

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi meg&mog

 

You spoke to her several times, the first time she stated ''wear and tear' was the last time, so it's an excuse.

 

I would tell her that you want to pursue the matter through the Financial Ombudsman Service which the Finance Company will have to pay for, the initial fee is £500 plus.

 

Could she provide her final response stating the date the car was purchased, the date the car was rejected and that the Finance Company won't allow rejection because they state 'wear & tear'.

 

Hi rebel

 

Didn't get anywhere with them she kept saying the problem was a wear and tear item and "things go wrong with cars especially ones that are 7 years old"

 

She asked what would I have done if this had happened 7 months down the line I simple said "it didn't"

 

She has left me with a mobile number of a man at the traders to arrange to collect the key from us

 

She wouldn't even consider rejecting or "recission" the car at all

 

I think I'm going to look round for another finance company this is a nightmare

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...