Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

interview under caution possible housing benefit overpayment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3601 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

Not evreyone here knows about housing benefit, but people should be along later with advice for you.

 

An overpayment of £160 doesn't sound much, I'm a bit surprised they want an IUC as you're repaying it. There may be a simple explanation, and some of the guys here understand the system. Please bear with us until they're able to get here.

 

In the meantime, I would say that all you can do is to tell the truth and take along any documents that back your case.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can take a solicitor to an IUC, and you can ask for it to be postponed while you find one.

 

But yeah, an IUC for £160? That's unusual. Are there any other sums owing? Can you give us a little more information on how this situation arose?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My council tax gets taken or it did then directly out of my wages as I had fallen behind and it had gone to court.I had what was only I believed 55 pound left owing and i was due a pay rise in april.My work still thought I owed around two hundred odd but the amount had changed due to me moving before the whole year was up.when i got my payslip they had taken 112 off so my wages were actually down 2 pound after the pay rise.I rang the council and they couldnt work out why so they said ring my payroll.when I did she told me that due to the payrise they had taken the extra amount as they had not been told by the council it was less owing due to the move.therefore she said it would still be paid off for a few months as i still owed 200 odd.Because i did not then take home more i did not tell them as I didnt have an increase.Iam not aware of any other overpayment I did not advise them that my tax credits had gone up as they always notify the council.unless there is an amount that I dont know about i cant see how

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure where you got the idea that hmrc notifies the council of tax credit changes - they don't, it is up to you to notify the council, so this could be an issue.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

If you don't mind me saying I received my council tax bill as I receive help and it listed the weekly amounts I receive. It also stated that from February 2015 my entitlement would drop. I rang and questioned why and they told me HMRC informed them that's when my overpayment of CTC would be fully repaid.

 

So HMRC have informed my council of the changes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sometimes they do, sometimes they don't - but it is the claimants responsibility to inform the different agencies of any changes as per their claim

 

Yes, there has always been a very unpredictable system of different benefit agencies telling eachother info about claimants, but it is not for the purpose of maintaining the claim, but more to prevent fraud. It is unreliable and does not substitute a claimant's responsibility to notify benefit changes themselves.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, there has always been a very unpredictable system of different benefit agencies telling eachother info about claimants, but it is not for the purpose of maintaining the claim, but more to prevent fraud. It is unreliable and does not substitute a claimant's responsibility to notify benefit changes themselves.

 

That's the key point, really. Never assume one agency (DWP, HMRC, Council) has told another agency about changes to your benefits. Always do it yourself.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To echo what others said.. It's your duty to report changes.

I am surprised that you are being iuc'd for £160 though. Are you sure that's the reason?

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...