Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot Claimform, 2005 citi card 'debt'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3599 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi,

 

i have recently been sent court papers from Northampton

re a debt which I last paid a token payment of £50 back in 2008.

I guess the DCA are now taking it to court just before it is statute barred.

 

since the debt was assigned to the claimant in early 2005

the debt has gone from £850 when assigned to them to £1700 now.

 

the court papers clearly states the agreement was terminated in 2005

and the agreement assigned to the claimant in early 2005.

 

They have been adding around £8 a month in interest.

 

my questions are:

Can the DCA add interest to the amount once the original agreement was terminated?

&

If I make an offer of payment to the court then will that stop a CCJ against my name?

 

thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all, as an addendum,

 

i can see that the original credit was charging me £5 a month for payment protection.

 

This was something i was unlikely ever to need as i was an NHS member of staff

and on a fixed term contract so the payment protection wouldnt pay out anyway.

 

i was never given a choice about PPI in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you give more info on the debt and the companies involved so far? Also the last date you made express written acknolwedgement that the debt was yours and last date of payment.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Credit card was citi-financial and the DCA is Cabot.

 

my last payment was £50 in Aug 2008,

hence why they are threatening court action now before it is statute barred next month.

 

I made the payment of £50 in Aug 2008 in response to their pestering letters.

I was subsequently in dialogue with them in Jan 2009 to ask for documentation like the CCA agreement etc.

At that time they havent sent me the assignment of debt paperwork etc.

 

I feel duty bound to pay some of the debt but I am angry that they have put close to £800 interest

on what was a £800 debt originally.

 

Can they charge this interest and what would be a reasonable offer of payment.

 

I am minded to ask for £50 a month until the debt is paid off.

Thoughts welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So theyre in default of a valid CCA request.

 

As usual. Cabot rarely ever have enforceable debts thats why we always advise people to check the facts asap.

 

However, since they now seem to have added on a ton of interest themselves

and its a subject of a court claim,

 

you'd need more specific advice.

 

Sit tight and the regulars will be around as soon as they can.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, here is my information, thank for your time and help.

 

 

Name of the Claimant: Cabot

 

Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.

 

Date of issue 27/06/2014 + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 16/07/2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 30/07/2014 (33 days in total)

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? That I had a credit card with Citi Financial from 2003, agreement terminated in early 2005 and assigned to Cabot.

 

What is the value of the claim? £1,600

 

Has the claimant included section 69 interest (8%)within the total claim or is it shown separate within the Particulars but not added to the debt?

 

Interest has been added since debt was assigned to Cabot, this has broadly doubled the debt.

 

Is the claim for a current or credit/loan account or mobile phone account?

No, claim regarding a debt that defaulted in 2005 and was assigned in early 2005

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007?

Before 2007

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.

DCA was assigned debt and they are issuing claim.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?

Possible, was a long time ago. Had dealt with Cabot in 2008 but they never sent me the notice of assignment so I left it at that.

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?

Probably, back in 2005.

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ?

No

 

Why did you cease payments:-

I had a number of competing debts as spending was more than coming in, to my shame I put my head in the sand and ignored debts.

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No, other than penalty charges which I complained about at the time.

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?

I have managed to clear most of the outstanding debts from before 2007 but Cabot has remained outstanding.

 

What you need to do now.

 

Answer the questions above

 

If you have not already done so – send a CCA1974 request to the claimant

 

I had received a number of documents in 2010 relating to my request for CCA 1974 documents, that said i didnt receive an assignment form.

 

Send a CPR31.14 request to the solicitor named on the claim form for copies of documents mentioned/implied within the claim form. There are two different versions - one for Loans/Credit cards the other for Current accounts

 

Request 1 - Loans/Credit Cards

Should I ask for this again? considering I got most of the documents previously?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi scottwilsonmr

 

As the debts been assigned you need to do a further section 78 request....unless it was Cabot in 2010.

 

If you could type out the particulars of claim (verbatim less any identifiable data) as requested above and then we can fully advise what your CPR 31 should request

 

PS Dont forget you must acknowledge the claim by tomorrow 15th July

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply, yes I did acknowledge the claim (online using moneyclaim website) last week, didn't want to be caught out by a judgement by default! Here is the particulars of the claim:

 

By an agreement between Citfinancial (CFE) the the defendant on or around 1/2/2003 CFE agreed to issue defendant with a credit card upon the terms and conditions set out therein. In breach of the agreement the defendant failed to make the minimum payments due and the agreement was terminated. The agreement was assigned to the claimant on 20/02/2005. The claimant therefore claims £1,800 (includes 105 court fee and 80 solicitor costs).

 

Note that the debt was £850 when assigned to Cabot on 20th Feb 2005. Note I sent a CCA1974 request to the claimant in 2008 and received a copy of the credit agreement (albeit no signatures) and past statements. No deed of assignment at that time. thanks in advance for your help. Scott

Edited by Andyorch
Paras added
Link to post
Share on other sites

So it was assigned over 9 years ago.....have you ever made payment or acknowledged the debt to Cabot?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I paid £50 in Aug 2008 in response to their pestering letters. Hence why they are seeking a CCJ now before it is statute denied. I was subsequently in dialogue with them in last 2008 and earlier Jan 2009 to ask for documentation like the CCA agreement etc. At that time they havent sent me the assignment of debt paperwork etc. Left it at alone since then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, should I make an offer of payment to clear this debt. I paid £50 in Aug 2008 otherwise it would be statute barred by now. If I make an offer of payment and keep to those payments will that prevent a CCJ in your opinion ?

Thanks for your help

 

No not unless you agree a settlement and get them to stay the claim...otherwise you must submit a defence.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy, yes I intend to submit a defence but not sure exactly what I should write.

 

I have made another payment toward the account and made an offer of a repayment schedule via email. I will copy these to the court unless I get any feedback from the company as proof that, even at this late stage, I am attempting to make a repayment plan.

 

Once the defence is submitted, I assume I will get a court date to defend infront of a county court judge ? I will attend to plead my case, namely that I had other debts to clear and Cabot was forgotten about. Not much of a defence but true. My financial situation was a mess and I have made a concerted effort to improve it.

The original lender but on penalty charges each month when my situation deteriorated and PPI from the start which was taken off as a monthly charge.

 

I know the debt is outstanding and, eventually, cabot produced the proper paper work albeit without a notice of assignment. I just want to make arrangements and ensure I dont get a CCJ, and most importantly that they dont get one by default without having to ge their solicitor to stand up infront of a judge and state their case.

 

any help or advice most welcome.

Scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you admit any part of their claim you will get a CCJ. The only way to avoid it is to pay in full befopre court action, settle out of court ( cabot love doing this as 90% of their claims wouldnt get past a judge), or pay within 28 days of judgement.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi renegadeimp. thanks for reply, i have decided to pay the original debt as it was when the debt was bought by Cabot. £900 and argue over the addition of interest charges since then. They never sent me a notice of assignment back in 2010 when they sent the original paperwork hence can I argue that they cannot ask for interest on the debt ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are paying the full amount and then arguing it after....I dont think it will be successful...yes you will avoid a CCJ but you wont ever see any unfair interest/charges refund.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi renegadeimp. thanks for reply, i have decided to pay the original debt as it was when the debt was bought by Cabot. £900 and argue over the addition of interest charges since then. They never sent me a notice of assignment back in 2010 when they sent the original paperwork hence can I argue that they cannot ask for interest on the debt ?

 

If I have this right, the debt is for more than £900, but you will pay £900 which was the balance some time ago and argue over the rest of the claim value because it is interest and charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that is correct, paying the original balance when sent to Citi Financial, the remainder (doubling the debt) is interest and charges, I never received statement of accounts detailing the interest or charges and never recevied the Assignment of Debt hence I will claim that these are unenforceable.

I dont mind paying what is due but not all of the additionals that DCAs try to add on in profit especially if they are not following the correct administration of debts.

Most importantly, i want to avoid a CCJ.

Thanks for all your advice,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I am right with the following (but I am sure someone will correct me if wrong!!):

 

If you pay the amount you suggest and defend all the claim you would avoid a CCJ until judgement and then it depends on the judgement and your subsequent action as to what happens in respect of a CCJ.

 

If you defend part of the claim only, you will get a CCJ

 

If you admit you will get a CCJ

 

If you do nothing you will get a summary judgement against you and a CCJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you again, but I will have paid the amount that I admit £900 and then defended the other £900 (lack of Notice of Assignment and lack of Statement of Accounts).

There is no point in me defending all the claim when I have admitted £900 of it and paid that before it goes to court. Does that make sense?

 

Wish me luck,

 

Scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not luck you need Scott.

 

If you admit any part of the claim, you will get a CCJ.

 

There is a point in defending all of the claim, as the claim is for £1800. You do not agree to the £1800 so you can defend it.

 

As part of the process you can then explain why you defended the claim of £1800 i.e. you believe you only owe £900

 

A

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, thanks, I dont really understand the jargon. I will ensure that I am defending the entire claim of £1800 and therefore I am defending it and stating I have paid £900 towards the debt.

 

Your help and comments gratefully received. Scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I am right with the following (but I am sure someone will correct me if wrong!!):

 

If you pay the amount you suggest and defend all the claim you would avoid a CCJ until judgement and then it depends on the judgement and your subsequent action as to what happens in respect of a CCJ.

 

If you defend part of the claim only, you will get a CCJ

 

If you admit you will get a CCJ

 

If you do nothing you will get a summary judgement against you and a CCJ

 

No you will get a Default Judgment

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...