Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Unsure what would be classed as appeal I first contacted the applicant then IAS. I am not aware I could appeal again as Bank state I was informed that is news to me. I would have to look through the paper work, I apologise I forget so much due to my caring duties wish I had quality time to get so much done. Will try and look tomorrow, appreciate everyone's time and input.
    • Hi, I've been reading the invaluable advice on this forum and reading about the problems with Evri and lost delivery of items.  From what I gather the initial steps after having exhausted every's own lost item claim process is to draft a Letter of Claim, I think it is called and to register with the government Money Claims.  I have got a login for Money Claims and have made an initial stab at the letter but I'm not certain I have got it right. Am I right to assume that having exhausted Evri customer service's claims process and having received the denial of any compensation because the laptop I was sending is on the non-compensatory list that my next step would be to send the Letter of Claim to them? Let me provide some basic details which I hopefully have addressed in the letter. I purchased a laptop through Amazon.co.uk which a business in Belfast sold refurbished laptops through.  They had a 30 day money back guarantee for a full refund if you have any issues with the laptop.  I have the invoice from Amazon showing the purchase.  On 27 April, 2024 before the end of the 30 day period I used their ParcelShop (inside a Tesco) to send the laptop back and have the tracking reference mentioned in the letter.  As mentioned in the letter there was they advised they could not give me or sell me any insurance because laptops are on the non-compensatory list so I just paid the normal delivery cost.  It was scanned as leaving the ParcelShop on 29 April and the tracking has been like that ever since.  After a 28 working day Evri claim process they gave the expected response that they could not provide any compensation and simply could not proceed with my claim. I was hoping to get some advice on whether I go ahead now and email this to Customer Services straightaway and should I send a hard-copy to the Evri address as well?  Or are there any steps I have missed out on first?  I believe 14 days is the reasonable period of time for them to respond so if I were to send it tomorrow, for example 12 June then I should expect a reply by 26 June, is that correct and fair?  And assuming they don't reply with a full refund then I would then go down the government Money Claims site to proceed with that? Sorry for all the questions, I want to make sure I go about it properly.  I'll continue to read through other cases on here so I can get an even better handle on the process. I attached a LOC, happy for any edits or updates that will make it even better. Thanks so much for anyone's help! Regards, Matt Evri letter of claim.docx
    • The date was 3 June. Get on MCOL now. The legal principle is that, even if you defence is late, if the other party hasn't requested judgement, then your defence takes priority and is accepted. You might be in time. When I say now I mean now.  Recently we had someone who was nine days' late and this was pointed out to them at 5:30pm.  They faffed around till 11pm.  When they went on MCOl they saw that judgement had been entered at 7pm. Every minute is vital. File the below standard defence if you still can - 1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of [motor vehicle]. 2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.    4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.  6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
    • Hi friends,  I’m a bit worried I may have got confused with timings here. I thought I had 33 days from my acknowledgment to submit a defence but the date added above says 3/6/24.   have I missed the date?   if so how can I apply for an exception due to my disability and problems with deadlines and dates etc (ADHD)?   what should I submit as a defence?   I’ve had no reply from BW so far    just been back on MCOL and it says 28 days from service if I completed an acknowledgment of service so does that mean 28 days from that of acknowledgement (I.e. 16/5) which would make deadline for defence 14/6?   Thanks! Panicking here.
    • Normally we don't advise playing your cards early in a snotty letter, but as you have appealed we might as well use what you wrote in the appeal against them. There is no rush, you have until 6 July to get it to them.  See what the other regulars think too. How about something like this? -   Dear Rachael & Sean, cheers for your Letter of Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea you'd actually thought I'd take such tripe seriously and would cough up! As usual you'll have been too bone idle to do any due diligence.  Had you done so you would have seen that I appealed to your client.  Indeed the driver on the day is a textbook example of having done exactly what you should do when you do not wish to be bound by the T&Cs in a private car park. Of course none of that mattered to the spivs you represent but do you really want to put such a useless case in front of a judge? To be fair, your clients are very useful members of the human race - as comedians.  How I loved the page turner of their antics at The Citrus Building in Bournemouth.  It was chuckle after chuckle reading about them, letter after letter, month after month, insisting they were legally in the right, even through someone who had done just the first day of a GCSE law course could have told them they weren't.  Until the denouement - BOOM - an absolute hammering in court.  In fact - SLAM, BANG - managing to lose twice against the same motorist for the same car park in front of two different judges. Your client can either drop their foolishness now or get yet another tolchocking* in court where I will go for an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) and spend the dosh on a nice summer holiday, while every day laughing at your clients' expense. I look forward to your deafening silence. COPIED TO COUNTRYWIDE PARKING MANAGEMENT LTD   *  This word is used under licence from Brassnecked
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sofa


RosieB86
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3623 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Have recently bought a sofa suite set. We bought it from a warehouse who sells to the big players in this world as we heard of them from word of mouth through family that had used them and the prices are half of that of DFS, SCS etc. We bought a 3 seater and a 4 seater sofa. We were quoted £700 for this, of which £100 was left as a deposit.

 

The sofas were subsequently delivered about 2 weeks later (6 days ago) after being made to order. When they were delivered they aren't what we ordered, they have actually given us a 2 and 3 seater rather than a 3 and 4 seater. Unfortunately I wasn't in at the time and my wife signed for them and accepted the delivery and paid the rest of the balance in cash despite the confusion.

 

Looking back I think we have messed up a little bit because we don't have an invoice for the order when we made it, the only thing we have from them is an invoice when it was delivered which states a 3 seater and a 2 seater sofa with a price on it, which my wife has subsequently signed on delivery to accept the goods.

 

I was sure we had ordered a 3 and 4 seater and rang the guy up on Monday and said look is there any way we can solve this, can we return the 2 seater and pay a bit extra for a 4 seater etc. He was very convincing and made me doubt we had ordered a 3 and a 4 seater. He said the price we paid was that of a 2 and 3 for sure. My sister who had sofas off them paid about £200 less for the same 2 and 3 seater as us in a different fabric, I queried this with them and was told the fabric we ordered in was much more expensive hence the difference in price. So I doubted myself and thought well theres not much we can do, we didn't have an invoice apart from the delivery one, they won't accept a return or exchange and say the only thing we can do is buy a 4 seater off them for £400.

 

Now here is the twist, I was looking through my glovebox today and I found the quote they gave us - for a 4 seater and a 3 seater, clearly written in their handwriting a 4 and 3 seater in the fabric we ordered, style we ordered for £700. So they are fobbing us off, they've made a mistake with the order and don't want to correct it and are pinning it on us.

 

So now I'm pretty mad. But I don't know where I stand legally given that we don't have an actual invoice, apart from the receipt we received upon delivery which says a 3 and 2 seater. I have this quote in their handwriting for the 3 and 4 seater though so it is them who made the mistake and are now covering it up. What rights do I have if any in this situation? Am I within my rights to demand a full refund within a certain period of time? What other options do I have? I am yet to ring them back to tell them I have their original quote so know they are bull****ting me. I want to know what rights I have and where I stand legally...

 

What other options do you think I have or what could I do? Kind of wish I had just gone to a big company now!!! Maybe you get the service you pay for!

 

Many Thanks!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I expect that the written quote will probably be enough to persuade a County Court judge – if it has to go that far.

 

Of course I suppose that they will say that they quoted you for one thing and then you change your mind and ordered something else. If they do say that then I think you need to ask them for their notes of the conversation, when the conversation happened and with whom the conversation did happen. Warn them that if that is their position, that the person who alleges that conversation will be required to attend court and to give that testimony under oath.

 

On the basis of what you say you have got a pretty good chance of success. If I were you I would write to them immediately and tell them exactly what has happened and include a copy of the quote.

 

Don't do anything on the telephone – or if you do make sure it is recorded. It's a shame that you didn't put in an order for a substantial piece of furniture like this and get some proper record of what was ordered. Hopefully you won't do this again.

 

Tell them that you want the items which have been delivered in error taken away and the correct furniture delivered within 14 days. Tell them that if there is any problem about delivering the correct furniture – maybe because it has got to be made that you are prepared to work with them on this but you will want a written confirmation of it all. Tell them that in the absence of this that you will begin a small claim in the County Court at the end a 14 days.

 

Don't make this threat if you're not prepared to carry it out. Spend the 14 days reading around this forum finding about how to bring small claims and also open an account with MoneyClaim, the online court service. Once you open an account you can start preparing your claim and have it already so that on day 15 if you haven't had from them what you've asked for then you can simply click and send it off. They will be served within 48 hours of that and then once they have got the court papers they will know that you're serious and they will either cooperate or they will provide a defence and you can see exactly what they're saying and go from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi RosieB86

 

Welcome to CAG

 

First thing to do, is don't speak to them over the phone. All communication in writing. Keep the quote and invoice safe.

 

Call CAB, explain the situation, get a reference number from them. Then use the following template (amended), add the following:-

 

'CAB/Trading Standards Ref: XXXXXXXXXXXXX to the letter' send it Recorded Delivery.

 

Scroll down to the correct template, as Bankfodder says send a copy of the quote.

 

http://www.which.co.uk/consumer-rights/problem/i-want-to-return-my-goods-what-are-my-rights

 

http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/nireland/consumer_ni/consumer_common_problems_with_products_e/consumer_goods_are_not_as_described_e/goods_dont_match_description.htm

 

You really should have paid by credit card, offers a lot of protection.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks for the help. Could they be in trouble for not giving receipts on order and asking for payment in cash etc? Am I actually legally entitled to a full refund if nothing else within a certain time period?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can reject the goods, as they are 'not as described', but you need to do it as soon as possible, don't get drawn into wanting a different suite. They should have given you order documentation, but you should have asked for it, don't get distracted on that.

 

Ok thanks for the help. Could they be in trouble for not giving receipts on order and asking for payment in cash etc? Am I actually legally entitled to a full refund if nothing else within a certain time period?
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...