Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Part of the POFA rules for creating a liability to pay a parking co is identifying the land they control so is there another palce of the incorrect name? If so then photographs of the other site will prove that your vehicle cnat possibly have been there as the images they will produce wont match the background etc. If however Bromhall developments is the name of their employer would the land in question be known by the same name for the entire development?   The POC is the usual rubbish and inaccurate one they cribbed from Gladstones so can be attacked in your outline defence.   Now I have googled Broomhall developments and they are an Irish Co that has bult a similar named housing estate in IRELAND. ther is also  a Broomhall gateway development plan for SCOTLAND but nothing in England, let alone Sheffield specifically   defence has to be in a fortnight after the deadline for the AOS assuming you get that in on time.   On google noseyneighbour I can see signs near to the parking bays that say permit holders only so unless you have a permit the signage doesnt apply to youas you would be prohibited fro parking there anyway. So with this in mind were you parked in a bay or on the road? Were you visiting or connected to the property that bay was allocated to and if so can you find out if the bay is part fo the property and noted in the deeds. If it is then it has nowt to do with VCS.   So you are going to grab some pictures and then you compare these to the web site of Broomhall development in ireland and that will be part fo your evidence   Also ask council when the Close was adopted by council as it appears to be a public highway
    • Ericsbrother   If I had the opportunity at the time I would have argued the value on the Court claim, however this wouldn't have changed by a significant amount.  So asking for it to be set aside is probably not going to end this in the long run.   No we don't owe any money to the business.   We have a good set of books and records.  No account filed as of yet.   The company is still 'active' on companies house and has not been dissolved.  We only received the Notice of enforcement a few days ago.       What makes you think they can force entry into a domestic property?      
    • Sorry but I think that it is rather precipitative giving advice – and rather over-generalised advice at that – until we understand more detail about the circumstances.
    • now the terms will specify that they can cancel if weather if bad etc and you have to accept that but by doing so they have to accept that the voucher's term is extended or they must refund for their failure to perform to the contract. essentially you should have asked for a refund on a no fly day and they would have to comply and by continuing to  accept things you were blindly accepting alterations to the original conrcat and that makes things more difficult. i would write again giving them 14 days to refund as they ahve filed to perform to their contractual obligations and then sue them if they still dont cough up. However, this meaqns you must follow through with the threat of cort action so before you start you need to read up on the relevant consumer legislation and also about performance of contracts
    • They say I was on Broomhall Developments, the car was parked on Broomspring Close.  S37XA
  • Our picks

Sturognic

nat west have lost my loan agreement paperwork.

Recommended Posts

I took out a loan with Nat West in May 2008.

 

I explained that I did not want it for more than 5 years, as I was due to retire in 5 years time.

 

The paperwork was drawn up and after reading it through, I signed.

 

When I asked for a copy, I was told that it had to go to Head Office first to be verified.

 

I began paying the monthly payment by Direct Debit and to be honest,

I forgot all about the fact that I hadnt got a copy,

until May 2010, when I received a statement showing all my payments.

 

The header on the statement said that I had taken this loan out for 84 months!

 

I visited my local branch where I had appplied for the loan and queried this.

 

I asked for a copy of the agreement and after many requests,

I eventually got a letter in August 2010 admitting that they were unable

to locate a copy of my agreement and that in these circumstances

if I chose to cease payments that they would not be able to enforce payment!

 

I still carried on paying for the full 60 months, because that is what I signed for.

 

My final payment was May 2013, I then cancelled the DD and

 

sought advice from the Citizens Advice Centre, who told me that without a copy of the agreement,

this loan was unenforceable and not to worry.

 

I have been sent a default notice and they say that my name has been put on the Credit Reference Agency,

but I am not bothered about that.

 

Since then, I have had three Collection Agencies

(Ascent Legal, Irwin Mitchell and Apex) asking for payment.

 

I have sent them all copies of the letter from Nat West, stating that this is not enforceable,

because they cannot provide me with a copy of the agreement, but still they keep writing to me.

 

The latest one is from HL Solicitors who claim they may take action through the courts.

 

I am getting so fed up with having to repeat myself to them

,Ii am just wondering if anyone can advise any action that will shut them up for good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you filed formal complaints with the dca and the bank?


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome.

 

So far you have done everything correct, and if you have the letter from the bank saying they have not got a copy of your original agreement and they will not be pursuing you for future payment as it is unen, then IMO that is all you really need.

 

The fact that they have no flogged the remaining balance on to questionable DCA's is indicative of the banks gluttony.

I would be entering into their complaints procedure and exhausting it to your satisfaction, sooner rather than later.

 

Whilst they are able to submit a recon of the agreement, it beggars belief why they have chosen not to do so?

 

Formal complaint to the bank, and any missives you get from any DCA forward them to the bank that you took the original agreement out with.


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Yes, I have sent Apex a letter of complaint

and have had a reply saying that they are "looking into" my complaint.

 

Ascent Legal and Irwin Mitchell were told by Nat West to `close the case`, back in November.

 

Incidentally, they were not told the reason why Nat West state I owe them.

 

Have sent letters to Nat West on several occassions but they never reply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you sent a complaint and headed it as such, give them 8 weeks to send a final response otherwise get onto the FOS, and provide everything you have so far.


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I am feeling more confident by the minute since posting on here. So, I send a formal letter of complaint (is there a template for this, please?) to the bank, along with any other letters I get from the DCA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have already been down the FOS route, in 2010 when the bank couldnt find my agreement

- what a waste of time that was.

 

I sent them everything I had written to the bank, and their response was,

they had seen "dump prints" from the bank and that although I was paying my dd each month,

I was trying to get out of paying.

 

I tried explaining that I would like to see these prints,

because if they did not show my name and details, they would be irrelevant to my case.

 

As far as they were concerned, the case was closed and no more communication would be entred into.

 

Needless to say, I signed their final response letter as Not satisfied.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you actually get a decision from an ombudsman then?

 

If the DCA's still chase and threaten you, then you really need to get in touch with the FCA and supply everything you have so far. You could also read up on harrison vs link in regards to continued harassment.


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, their decision was that they didn`t uphold my complaint, even though I intended to fulfill my obligation by paying the full 60 months, which is what I have done.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FCA then, and ignore anything else.


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The latest is I have had a reply to my complaint letter to Apex, who have apologised for continuing to write on behalf of their client "nat west" regarding this.

 

They are admitting that their own system didn't work and that they should have put a stop to any communication once they were aware that the loan is unenforceable.

 

This letter was very honest and I appreciate them for holding their hands up and apologising.

To be fair to Apex, I do believe that Nat West did not give them the whole story and chose to ignore the fact that they have already admitted themselves that the agreement is unenforceable. Apex have confirmed that they will no longer be contacting me in the future and wait for it........... that Nat West have now recalled the case.

 

No doubt Nat West will try yet another DCA to try going down the same route again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could lodge a complaint with the ICO. The fact that they have lost your agreement is a breach of Data Protection principle 7, even if it's been lost accidentally.

 

http://ico.org.uk/for_organisations/data_protection/the_guide/the_principles

 

http://ico.org.uk/for_the_public/raising_concerns


Welcome to Consumer Action Group

 

'Challenges are what makes life interesting; overcoming them is what makes life meaningful.'

Joshua J. Marine

 

1) CLAIM BACK ALL PENALTY CHARGES CLICK HERE

2) CLAIM BACK ALL MIS-SOLD PPI CLICK HERE

3) COMPOUNDED CONTRACTUAL INTEREST CLICK HERE

4) REQUEST CCA FROM CREDITOR CLICK HERE

5) OFT- UNENFORCEABLE AGREEMENTS CLICK HERE

6) CAREY V HSBC (2009) CLICK HERE

7) DON'T BE BULLIED BY CREDITORS / DCA's CLICK HERE

8) IN DEBT DON'T PANIC CLICK HERE

9) FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT CLICK HERE

10) SALE OF GOODS ACT-EDUCATE YOUR RETAILER CLICK HERE

11) DISTANCE SELLING-EDUCATE YOR RETAILERCLICK HERE

12) SOGA SUMMARY CLICK HERE

13) WHICH? TEMPLATES [/url]CLICK HERE

14) DOES YOU BANK TREAT YOU FAIRLY BCOBSCLICK HERE

15) EVERYTHING HOUSING CLICK HERE

16) UTILITY BACKBILLING CLICK HERE

17) OFGEM - COMPLAINTSCLICK HERE

18) OFCOM - COMPLAINTS CLICK HERE

DON'T GIVE UP, THIS SITE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH GUIDANCE AND EMPOWERMENT

 

Don't forget to donate to this site

 

Please let us know how your problem has been resolved, it could help fellow Caggers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your initial complaint should be directed to Nat West.

 

It is they who have screwed up and have confirmed that they are unable to pursue you because of this. In which case, they had no right to involve a 3rd party in order to pressure you to pay.

 

IMHO you have been treated unfairly. Not least because of them not providing a copy of the agreement at the time of signing.


Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy -

HERE

2: Take back control of your finances -

Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors?

Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt

Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated -

Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since my last post on this subject, Nat West had used some more DCA to try and get out of the fact that my agreement was unenforceable, (Robinson Way was used twice despite closing the account down in 2014). 

Westcot, Moorcroft, Irwin Mitchell are just a few.

 

Just to update readers, I had a phonecall from Nat West complaints a week ago, totally out of the blue, to inform me that they were writing off the balance and closing my file, so would not be contacting me again.

 

I requested a letter to confirm this and received that over the weekend, so...............................RESULT

. It certainly pays to keep positive and when you know that you are right, to hang in there and do not give up at any cost. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...