Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who would know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes in those days. Sorry not to.be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3672 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please help someone :(

 

I've worked for the same company for almost 7 years,

have given so much and never had any recognition for it,

which is what it is,

 

however last year I went for a promotion which would have meant me having a higher job than my boss

but I would have been working at a different site..

( I did on numerous occasions ask my boss if she wanted to go for the job, she said no, better the devil etc, before I applied),

 

my boss was (according to her) asked questions as to my suitability for the position,

should add that my boss isn't very keen on anyone moving up the ladder at work, let alone above her.

 

Needless to say I didn't get the promotion, and further more she (my boss) has been horrid to me since,

she will pick fault with everything I do, or don't do as I not only have to be super woman but also a mind reader,

she undermines me in front of the staff below me, I try to speak in private and her agitation and "can't be arsed" attitude is clear.

 

Just recently I had 4 days off work with a really bad virus.

 

She was fine with me when I came back to work, but then I noticed that my hours had been cut.

 

I asked her yesterday about this and she that we had to save hours (which I understand,

but what I don't get is that the other woman who worked along side me hasn't had hers cut,

we are meant to share the early or extra hours.

 

It just seems that she's being unnecessarily mean just because I was ill

( we don't get paid for being off sick, so surely that's punishment enough?)

 

Please can someone advise me what to do?, as apparently my contract hours can be altered in 2 weeks if the managers so choose.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that your only real options in this situation are to pursue a grievance or to find another job and leave.

 

There are clear grounds for a grievance, but as you will appreciate this may well make any bad feeling with this woman worse. Do you have an approachable HR Manager with whom you could have an off the record chat - to find out why your application for promotion was unsuccessful? If making it official, then you would need something more concrete than 'she doesn't like me' - probably best to emphasise the perceived inequalities in the way that your hours are being reduced but equivalent grade colleagues are not being affected.

 

Not a comfortable situation I know, but to really get anywhere needs evidence, so start compiling a diary away from work detailing times dates and what is said, together with details of any witnesses who might be able to back you up if needed.

  • Confused 1

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

unfortunately the HR department is at head office, and yes I realise that in opening a grievance will make my life more miserable, and I know that would give me even more evidence of her behaviour but i couldn't tolerate it.

The impression that is given to me is one whereby my boss is held in high acclaim by the managers above her, but then maybe that's just the impression they have to give.

It's a worry financially for me that my boss can just cut my hours leaving me financially so short on my wages, it's that which is the bigger concern for me.

I did press her as to why it was my hours and not my colleagues that were reduced, her reply was, I did the Rotas while you were off. Should add that the Rotas are not behind safety glass or anything and my boss herself often scribbles on them, please also note that my boss hasn't reduced her hours, and will happily do between 40-55 hrs a week.

Edited by Alexkat1970
Needed to add extra
Link to post
Share on other sites

If it were me, I would lodge a grievance solely about the unilateral reduction in hours and the fact that the need to reduce costs in the department is not being applied equally. This will force the employer to deal with the grievance and it may provide then the opportunity to air suggestions that the reason in part might be a personality clash with the manager concerned.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My boss is off for a few days on Monday (thank goodness) so I will have to raise this with my GM and hopefully it will be resolved.

Thank you so much for advising me.

Was being made to believe I was being paranoid over my bosses treatment towards me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...