Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I was caught shoplifting 4 items £20 worth, I’m petrified the Police will come to my house now please can you help. What can I do I worried about my job. 
    • I heard nothing more from J&P but have now had an email from the bank saying they have instructed IDR to act on their behalf?  so are they just passing it back? Selling it on again? I don’t know if this is a good or bad thing 
    • I posted a couple of years ago about our debt situation and have been trying to pay off our debt as best we can. It is a possibility I maybe made redundant in a few months time, so I am trying to find out everything I can about what happens in today’s world when you can’t pay. I keep finding conflicting advice on various sites so I wanted to post this quote to get thoughts. It claims basically that the dca will likely get enforceable documents these days and therefore it’s likely you will have to pay dca at some point during the 6 year process.    on here I read a lot of comments assuming the exact opposite of this. A lot of the threads on here state the beginning of the process but I never see conclusive stuff about what happened from start to finish to get insight into whether debts post 2015 have been enforced etc. I hear a lot here not to pay dca companies but most my debts are post 2015 debts I am all up to date on our debts but if I lose my job it is likely I’ll end up where I tried to avoid in the first place. Which is destroying our files and dealing with DCA. I’ll post it below so you can see what I mean.   It is likely that any debts incurred after 2007 will end up with all the documentation being provided and being enforceable. Therefore you should use the time while awaiting responses going through your Income & Expenditure and considering any possiblity of making a full and final settlement. It can take a number of months to reach the stage of a hearing date and exchange of witness statements and normally you would be able to settle or come to an arrangement to pay before the court hearing, once documents have been provided, although this isn’t guaranteed.
    • depends who said sols state their client is. IDRWW vis~IDR(worldWide) are a debt collector regulated & registered in the UK & USA    they are not solicitors. they use various 'for hire' - here use our letterhead paper tiger solicitors. its just a case of who's stupid enough to join their folly. IDR law used to be their fav but they lost do much money, they broke ties after almost being struck off and now do Will/Probate disputes only. IDR Legal are their sols wing. moriarty law Judge and priestly Taheel - a foreign DCA that use absolutely any trick in the book to extort money even pretending to be any of the above inc being the bank themselves in phone calls.           
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

raxtyjaxter Vs. HSBC


raxtyjaxter
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6324 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received the Acknowledgement of Service this morning. It is signed by Deborah D'Aubany dated 15th December. Is this when the 28 days commences? All I need to do is write to DG Solicitors enclosing my charges breakdown!!! Not long till I get my money!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

but now is when you send 3 copies of your breakdown to the court and 1 copy to ms.debs at dg. both with cover notes referencing your court claim number. - and for dg - give all your contact numbers. total it up for dg - on the cover note - charges + interest + court cost = total.

nearly there - hang in there a little longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

after the 28 days, if they haven't filed defense - you press for judgment and you win, but mostly they file at the last minute. then you receive a couple of days later, a change to your local court, a copy of their defense and an aq to fill in. look for the aq deadline and mark it on the calendar - your aq must be in by that date - i don't see the point in sending it any earlier than it is required as it costs 100 (if your claim is over 1500), so just keep it in mind and don't let the date pass. chances are very good that they will settle before the aq is due - nearly all have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I received a letter today from HSBC. Saying (in brief)...

"Thank you for your letter dated 14th November (Prelim letter - a little over 14 days late of reply deadline) we are sorry to hear you are disappointed with the charges held against you. Please accept compensation of £703.48"

My total claim against HSBC is £918.00, so its over £200 short of the total charges placed against me. As you know, I am going thru MCOL now and have had acknowledgement from DG Solicitors.

I'm right in thinking that this letter is in no way connected to DG Solicitors?!?! and I should just wait a little longer to get my full settlement money (£1079.80 with interest and court fee). HSBC also said in the letter that if I do not respond within 10 days then they take it that I have declined - maybe I should wait near on a month before I respond like they did to me!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, it has nothing to do with dg, it is a very, very belated offer from you earlier letters - and as such i don't think it even deserves a rejection letter. just sit tight - or for something to do - give dg a call and ask if they received your breakdown. just being proactive instead of just sitting and waiting - you might in all innocence ask if you need to respond to hsbc's very belated offer to you.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm right in thinking that this letter is in no way connected to DG Solicitors?!?!

Yes, you can ignore it or if you want to reply:

 

Dear [named sender or Sirs]

 

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xx. Prior to receipt of your letter I have filed a claim in the County Court and have therefore incurred further costs.

 

I respectfully decline your offer of settlement and request, once again, that you return to me all charges imposed on this account, interest and court fees now totalling £xxxx

 

I will accept the sum offered only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder.

 

I will be willing to withdraw my claim upon receipt of unconditional full settlement of my claim.

 

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just read Daisy111's thread and I now feel that I shud reply to HSBC along the lines that Daisy111 used...

"Thank you for letter dated (blah). However I decline your offer of £703.48 as this is unsatisfactorily less than my original claim and the interest from my claim and my court fees have not been included in your offer"

What do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was in mid-post before I read your reply's. I am thinking that by the time they give me partial settlement, it'll be close to when they will give me full settlement. I am torn to whether I should respond or not and to just ring DG Solicitors to see if they received my letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

has nothing to do with partial of full offer - that offer was from hsbc - and unless you accept if (don't!), everything marches on via dg. whether you respond to it is really no biggie one way or the other - it doesn't affect your dealings with dg at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's 28 days from the day of service - found on the first letter you got from the court. around the 12th jan.? on the 28th day - try to press the mcol judgment button - if it's the wrong day - it won't let you press and if they've defended (likely) it also won't let you. when you called dg before - did they say they had your breakdown?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have looked at MCOL this morning and it tells me that they are defending the claim in full. Last minute job. I was getting ready to pass judgement on the the claim and win by default.....nevermind. I have yet to receive documentation of the claim being passed on to my local court. What happens now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

just that...you will get paper notice of their defense, transfer to local court and your aq. check the aq and note the deadline. you sent dg a copy of your breakdown already? i think, anyway - it's a good time to ring them and say have they received your breakdown, and that you will be needing to file your aq shortly (not really - just saying it for now) and you were hoping to avoid further costs all around, would you be hearing from them soon? just feel them out - no hard stuff. generally, making sure they have your paperwork to hand. like a bump!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I received the paperwork this morning in the post. I will briefly jot down what their defence says:

 

1)Claimant account is governed by the Defendants personal banking t/c's

2) Defendant is entitled to make a charge for its services, set out in defendants price list

3) Defendant denies unfair charges applied to account to penalties at common law and/or unfair contract terms of purpose of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (UTCCR's)

4) Charges applied are reasonable and are fully disclosed in the defendants t/c's. Charges represent the contractually agreed price and the UTCCR's are not applicable to them; alternatively, they are not unfair contrary to the UTCCR's. These are default charges and not a penalty.

5) Each and every allagation by the claimant is denied. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

Does this sound like the normal schpeel they send out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi raxtyjaxter

hope you don't mind me jumping on your thread but i'll be interested to know if this is the usual goggins that they put in their defense.

have you looked at the link for aq? i think its at the beginning of the cag and is in stickys thread... not sure how to paste a link, but have a look.

netty

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My AQ deadline is the 30th Jan. A Tuesday. I am going to ring up DG Sol tomorrow and ask them if they have my breakdown. They will probably say no, so I'll have to fax it to them. Hopefully its not long till I see my money!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's always a last minute job - probably because they have seen increasing numbers of claims being pursued! It's a waiting game now - the AQ papers and details of the claim being passed to your local court should arrive soon. Take note of what lateralus said about being aware of the deadline for the AQ papers to be back at the local court though and try and wait as long as possible before sending them back. My offer from DG only came 3 days before the deadline for the AQ papers needed to be back at the court so just hang in there - you should hear from DG soon enough!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. I am wondering what to say to DG tomorrow. Obviously I will say have you received my breakdown and what not, but I am on about the matter of them making an offer. Surely they will say "What makes you think we will make an offer to you...." My claim is for less than £1500, so I can't use the excuse that when I fill in the AQ it will add a cost of £100 to my claim, so it's in your interest to make an offer. Just a little worried at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how about after have you received my breakdown, just something like, can you tell me if i will be hearing anything from your office anytime soon, i'd like to think we could get this wrapped up pretty soon. (just polite but inquiring). anything i can do to help move things along? (the attitude here is polite but firm - like let's get this done!) think of the banks calls you've had!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried ringing Deborah yesturday, but to no avail. It kept on clicking to answer machine. Does anyone know if she is away temporarily, or is there another number I could ring? Failing that should I just fax through my breakdown anyway? Trouble is, I want to speak to them to try and move it along....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke to Deborah and she was very busy on Monday.

 

I left my number and she said some one would call.

 

They did in the PM and lady was very nice.

 

I have had no issue with them phoning me.

 

They have been very helpful. To be honest not at all as I expected.

4th January 2008 - Prelim sent

16th January 2008 - Standard reply - NO!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...