Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Harlands - Lifestyle Fitness Gym Advice Needed


daddywb
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3699 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

My wife and myself joined our local Lifestyle Fitness gym in October 2013. Due to unforeseen circumstances, we were unable to get to the gym for a few month's so requested that they freeze our membership until March 2014. This we put to the person at the gym.

 

He said he would do this but failed to do so on time. He was apologetic but advised us to speak to Harlands about this. We didn't know who Harlands were. We thought they must be the gym owners, but now we know after reading posts on here!!

 

We should have renewed our DD (as we cancelled it) in March but forgot. We have today received a letter saying that the direct debit payment had been missed and that a 25.00 admin fee would be applied, which I understand is illegal/unenforceable.

 

When I asked them about my wife's membership which I had also requested freezing, they said that I had to speak to another department. (strange I thought).

 

I then learn't that they had not cancelled her account and have sent it to their debt department.

 

I am now mighty p'd off with this company as I want to be speaking to Lifestyle Fitness now some monkey debt collection/management company.

 

Things to note.

 

1. We never signed a DD agreement. The gym guy sat opposite us and just asked us questions and completed it. No tick in a box or signature was asked for.

2. We have NEVER received any contract, membership details, cards or direct debit information and have never signed anything.

 

I spoke to them today and foolishly agreed to pay half the admin fee (not knowing that they can't do this). Now I have read about them on here and after experiencing they way they have treated us today, I no longer want to do any business with this gym or their management monkeys.

 

I read on here about the OFT and gyms here http://www.oft.gov.uk/news-and-updates/press/2013/62-13

 

I am pretty sure that we have a good case and should be able to just write a nice polite letter and tell them to bog off and cancel our membership.Can anyone advise on our rights?

 

Another I noticed is that they kept referring to the "Data Protections Act" in emails and also when I spoke to them on the phone. They have never done this before so I guess they are trying to polish up their act...

 

Can anyone advise on our rights?

 

Many thanks for any advice you can offer.

 

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dad,

 

First off, you signed a gym agreement and are bound by it for 12 months, plus any months they agree to freeze at a zero or reduced monthly fee.

 

However, if the gym has failed to treat you fairly or with a reasonable degree of diligence by failing to handle your freeze request, they may be in breach of the m/ship agreement.

 

Also, by insisting on charging you unlawful admin (penalty) fees, they may also be in breach of any agreement between you.

 

How were they taking DD pay'ts before if you hadn't signed a DD mandate??

 

If you are certain neither you nor YW signed a DD mandate, write to Harlands to say:-

 

Dear sir or madam,

 

I refer to the dispute about gym fees and require sight of my membership agreement, any applicable T&C's and any DD Mandate signed by me.

 

I have now found that any admin fees that you seek to charge are unlawful penalties. Accordingly, I will not pay any such fee or part thereof.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

When they refer to the DPA, it'll be so they don't have to discuss YW's m/ship with them, just as they won't discuss your m/ship with YW.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick,

 

Thanks for your reply.

 

We didn't sign any agreement. We have never seen one.

 

When we signed up we sat opposite the gym guy who had a laptop (couldnt see the screen) and he just asked us our details etc and set it up. We didn't tick any boxes or sign anything.

 

Like I say, we have never seen any form of contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, just wanted to add that when we called them to freeze the memberships, they could not find our information anywhere. They tried using d.o.b, postcodes the lot and had to re-enter the information. I wonder if this is the reason we never received any contracts or other memberships information.

 

Don't know if this has an bearing on things?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dad,

 

I'm just confused as to how they have been taking payments without a signed DD mandate.

 

Please send Harlands the letter above and let us know how they reply.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dad,

 

Yes, a DD mandate needs to be signed before it is sent on to the bank by the payee.

 

Get the letter off. If you can, go to the Post Office and get a free Certificate of Posting so you have proof of postage.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Slick,

 

Ok, so I have now heard back from Harlands after I sent them a stinking letter.

 

Without quoting the whole letter, they say that "I completed an legally binding online agreement". They also say and I quote "The last page of the process requires you to declare that you acknowledge that the agreement will become binding upon both parties once you have checked the I agree box below the Next Step button. For your agreement to have proceeded, you will have completed this procedure."

 

Well, as I stated in my initial post, I did not even see the computer screen. The manager sat opposite us and completed the information as he asked us. At no stage did we see the terms and conditions or click any agreement buttons or boxes.

 

I am happy to tell them to go xx themselves as they are really trying it on. I think the letter just looks like some template to be honest.

 

Question is, is any of this enforceable? We are in the right, but do they have a leg to stand on?

 

If they try and pass the debt out to a DCA, can we just request to see a signed copy of the agreement?

 

It does seem like this (and no doubt other companies) are now trying to hide behind this online contracts rubbish.

 

I also found this post on their own website that states that any unsigned agreements are unenforceable and for the staff to make sure that they are signed. It is from 2009 though so not sure if it is at all relevant today.

 

http://www.harlandsgroup.co.uk/newsletter/hg-february-2009/index.html

 

Your advice is much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dad,

 

If there's no signed DD mandate, I assume payments were taken using a CPA. It's important that you check that the bank is aware that you authorise NO further payments to Harlands from either of your bank a/c's.

 

I think you should also check with the bank, and let us know if there was a DD mandate or a CPA set up for the pay'ts.

 

It would be deemed acceptable proof that you consented to the m/ship agreement, and it's T&C's, if you ticked the appropriate box on their online system. However, that does NOT mean you are bound by any Term or Condition that is unfair to you as a consumer or unlawful - ie their admin (penalty) charges. The fact that you didn't see what you were "consenting" to may not be your strongest argument because it's difficult to prove what actually happened.

 

The article from Harlands own website is interesting but not particularly helpful to your case. As I said above, the ticking of a box is an acceptable alternative to the signing of an agreement or contract, on an online system. Having said that, without your signature on a DD mandate or m/ship agreement, Harlands have an uphill struggle enforcing the agreement.

 

In terms of a reply to Harlands, lets keep it simple :-

 

I refer to your letter of xxdate.

 

For your information, I ticked no "I agree" box, nor did I use the gym's computer system in any way to set up the gym agreement(s). The gym manager sat opposite us and did all the inputting of data.

 

In any event, even if I consented to the agreement, that does not mean I have to abide by any term that is unfair to me as a consumer or any term that is compels me to pay an unlawful and unenforceable penalty or admin fee.

 

Furthermore, the gym failed to apply the "freeze" on our memberships as they agreed. Accordingly, they are in breach of the membership agreements and you should consider them terminated forthwith.

 

I you agree to the content, send that off and let us know how they respond.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...