Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hamster Bedding. Ignore.
    • Hi, below is a draft of the letter Address: Hugo Martin Director of Legal and Company Secretary EVRi Parcelnet Ltd trading as Evri CAPITOL HOUSE, 1, CAPITOL CLOSE LEEDS LS27 0WH REQUEST OF CONTRACTS      Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing in regards to the ongoing small claims case ____. In your Defendant’s response you make reference to a pre-existing commercial agreement between yourselves and Packlink (2.7). In that, you claim to have a clause removing customers third party rights under the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. I would like to request a copy of this contract and confirmation of the date on which the exclusion of third party rights term was included in it. If you refuse to provide this then I will be henceforth referring to that refusal in the claim, including to the Judge. I also notice that you have destroyed tracking information due to "lapse of time" in line with your data protection policy (2.12). Can you share where this data protection policy is disclosed to customers? I also ask you to forward you a copy of that data protectiono policy, and again if you refuse to provide this then I will be henceforth referring to that refusal in the claim, including to the Judge. Kind regards,
    • Firstly, thank you for filling in the sticky so quickly - we wish everyone who comes here would do that! You're in the clear.  MET don't know who the driver was.  They can use Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 to transfer liability to the keeper if their bilge arrives within 14 days - they didn't send it out till 102 days after!!! So sit on your hands.  MET will come out with threat after threat but ultimately will do nothing. Have a read of other threads for this car park - we are having a tsunami of cases at the moment. Be sure to come back here though if they ever send you a Letter of Claim.  
    • Just received this letter from Lowell.  IMG_1032.pdf
    • I don't think you are misunderstanding. It seems something may have gone missing. HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Anyone else heard that ESA medicals are on hold?


Lilly_Monroe
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3736 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Has anyone else heard that ESA medicals are on hold for the time being.

I read on another forum and the information was taken from

Benefits and Work obtained the memo from the DWP via a Freedom of Information request. It is headed: ‘FOR URGENT CASCADE. Control of the Referral of Repeat work Capability Assessments’.

 

Apparently there is a huge backlog of medicals, and with the impending ousting of ATOS the DWP have decided to leave people on ESA alone for the time being until they get some replacement sorted out and into place.

 

This could account for why some people are still waiting medicals, (my self included) some people have not even received their due ESA form).

Could this be true.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It has been reported extensively that repeat medicals for ESA are currently suspended, but I don't know if that applies to people already awaiting medicals or just anyone due to be reassessed in the future.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It has been reported extensively that repeat medicals for ESA are currently suspended, but I don't know if that applies to people already awaiting medicals or just anyone due to be reassessed in the future.

 

Seems the whole damn system is in a mess I since read that people are not being told their medical is on hold nor were MPs informed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote from the leaked memo

 

“The number of cases currently with Atos Healthcare has grown. A decision has therefore been taken to control the referral of repeat work capability assessments. Therefore, with effect from 20 January 2014, further routine repeat assessments referrals to Atos will be deferred until further notice.

 

“Controlling the volume of repeat Work Capability Assessments should help us to reduce delays for new claimants and those that have already been referred.”

 

The memo goes on to say that staff must still refer claimants for reassessment where there has been a reported change in condition, giving the example of a claimant placed in the Work Related Activity Group whose condition worsens and who might be expected to move into the Support Group.

 

Aside from this, however, reassessment of existing claimants is to end until further notice, with no new cases being referred to Atos from 20th January.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I've recently phoned the DWP as my two year award is up in one months time.

 

I asked if I was due to be reassessed and was told my case will be up for review. Guess that could mean anything really but if they are working strictly to their original time frames I think should I receive the forms in the next day or so to give me the four weeks to return them before my end date.

 

I'm hoping, however, that 'review' means I won't have to go through the whole system again as I only won my tribunal to be placed in the support group less than six months ago and maybe they will just take a look at it and decide to extend it. They only really need to look at my history really to see it wouldn't be worth the expense of a full reassessment as my prognosis is very poor according to their own disability A-Z of conditions.

 

Like others, I can't bear the thought of having to go through it all again but if needs must I will even though I still haven't regained the ground I lost due to the stress from my last assessment. Fingers crossed that this news is true and that we will be left in peace for a while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DWP aren't planning on informing claimants of this new development, so I reckon the forms will go out as usual and then be filed away until the DWP find a solution. Unfortunately this won't help any anxiety claimants might have.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I've recently phoned the DWP as my two year award is up in one months time.

 

I asked if I was due to be reassessed and was told my case will be up for review. Guess that could mean anything really but if they are working strictly to their original time frames I think should I receive the forms in the next day or so to give me the four weeks to return them before my end date.

 

I'm hoping, however, that 'review' means I won't have to go through the whole system again as I only won my tribunal to be placed in the support group less than six months ago and maybe they will just take a look at it and decide to extend it. They only really need to look at my history really to see it wouldn't be worth the expense of a full reassessment as my prognosis is very poor according to their own disability A-Z of conditions.

 

Like others, I can't bear the thought of having to go through it all again but if needs must I will even though I still haven't regained the ground I lost due to the stress from my last assessment. Fingers crossed that this news is true and that we will be left in peace for a while longer.

 

It is true - and they are not informing anyone.

They need to get the new claimants processed so need their resources for that.

I imagine this also effects PIP which was already in a mess.

Bit by bit the wheels are coming off the wagon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Thanks HB.

 

Well I expect we should look upon this as good news.

Is it a chink in their armour who knows.

 

I feel that if they are looking to let people move over from WRAG to support whose condition has deteriorated without a medical, then they are in a real mess.

 

Accounts for why they want to charge for appeals, they cannot cope

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DWP aren't planning on informing claimants of this new development, so I reckon the forms will go out as usual and then be filed away until the DWP find a solution. Unfortunately this won't help any anxiety claimants might have.

 

I'll let you know if I get the forms, in fact my end date is four weeks from tomorrow so they should be here very soon.

 

If they do come I'll virtually just copy my last ESA50 as it's too stressful to keep going over and over things. How on earth are people meant to recover from severe psychological trauma when they are constantly being asked to dredge it all up and not being allowed to move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll let you know if I get the forms, in fact my end date is four weeks from tomorrow so they should be here very soon.

 

If they do come I'll virtually just copy my last ESA50 as it's too stressful to keep going over and over things. How on earth are people meant to recover from severe psychological trauma when they are constantly being asked to dredge it all up and not being allowed to move on.

They should have arrived as they give you 4 weeks before return date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks Lilly. Maybe they will just review it and give me a bye.

 

Even though I've been treated very well and fairly through the whole process it's still a tortuous system.

 

Yes compared to many I have not been treated that badly, but I do object to being made to justify my illness as well as attend pointless interviews with my WP at 57 and a catalogue as long as your arm of illnesses who the hell is going to take me on.

I am a liability not an asset.

 

Hope all goes well for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Lilly.

 

I was initially placed in the WRAG group for two years and would have been satisfied with that as my needs are small but thank heavens at the time I read on this forum about the WFI's and the work programme as there's no way I could cope with that. So I appealed for the support group, had the tribunal in my home as I'm unable to travel any distance and they had no hesitation in awarding me the 15 points under section 35. In fact they cut the tribunal short as they heard enough for their decision and didn't want to distress me further.

 

I truly do feel for those in WRAG who struggle on a daily basis to comply with the requirements yet have no realistic chance of finding employment, it really is pointless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Lilly.

 

I was initially placed in the WRAG group for two years and would have been satisfied with that as my needs are small but thank heavens at the time I read on this forum about the WFI's and the work programme as there's no way I could cope with that. So I appealed for the support group, had the tribunal in my home as I'm unable to travel any distance and they had no hesitation in awarding me the 15 points under section 35. In fact they cut the tribunal short as they heard enough for their decision and didn't want to distress me further.

 

I truly do feel for those in WRAG who struggle on a daily basis to comply with the requirements yet have no realistic chance of finding employment, it really is pointless.

 

It is always good to hear when good old common sense plays a part.

Well done on winning your appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my view its very unlikely those already reffered will be affected. There is a fair few people replying on b&w thinking their medicals are going to get cancelled, I think they wont. I believe this will only affect those who have not got an active refferal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks HB.

 

Well I expect we should look upon this as good news.

Is it a chink in their armour who knows.

 

I feel that if they are looking to let people move over from WRAG to support whose condition has deteriorated without a medical, then they are in a real mess.

 

Accounts for why they want to charge for appeals, they cannot cope

 

Most likely they will just stay in WRAG unless the claimant asks for a reassessment with the hope of getting SG.

 

The memo seems to indicate "change of circumstances" will still be reffered for a WCA.

 

Its the automatic refferals that are affected not manual refferals. If a claimant on WRAG contacts the DWP stating they should be in SG, in my view they will be reffered to ATOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most likely they will just stay in WRAG unless the claimant asks for a reassessment with the hope of getting SG.

 

The memo seems to indicate "change of circumstances" will still be reffered for a WCA.

 

Its the automatic refferals that are affected not manual refferals. If a claimant on WRAG contacts the DWP stating they should be in SG, in my view they will be reffered to ATOS.

 

 

Well it still shows they cannot cope - all that talk and money and they have made a pigs ear of it.

It could be they are losing the will - after all there is an election next year maybe they have other things to go chase.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DWP aren't planning on informing claimants of this new development, so I reckon the forms will go out as usual and then be filed away until the DWP find a solution. Unfortunately this won't help any anxiety claimants might have.

 

I believe the ESA50's go directly back to ATOS. Meaning they are not sent out until a refferal is made?

 

I think back to the 2-3 years before I migrated to ESA.

 

On IB I was been assessed annualy, then Labour announced ESA, and after that point I didnt have a single IB50 or assessment, I was simply parked until I migrated as I believe they deffered indefenitly all PCA's probably not wanting ATOS assessors to be doing PCA's and WCA's at the same time.

 

This seems a similiar situation, now all ESA WRAG/SG claimants not currently reffered effectively been parked unless they have a change of circumstances.

 

However those still on IB are now likely to have a much shorter waiting time before migration, this could be the 'real' reason for this policy as it will be embarassing for IDS if in 2015 election people are still on IB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the ESA50's go directly back to ATOS. Meaning they are not sent out until a refferal is made?

 

I think back to the 2-3 years before I migrated to ESA.

 

On IB I was been assessed annualy, then Labour announced ESA, and after that point I didnt have a single IB50 or assessment, I was simply parked until I migrated as I believe they deffered indefenitly all PCA's probably not wanting ATOS assessors to be doing PCA's and WCA's at the same time.

 

This seems a similiar situation, now all ESA WRAG/SG claimants not currently reffered effectively been parked unless they have a change of circumstances.

 

However those still on IB are now likely to have a much shorter waiting time before migration, this could be the 'real' reason for this policy as it will be embarassing for IDS if in 2015 election people are still on IB.

 

I would not mind being parked if it meant being left alone, but I suspect the Work Programme providers might have been told to up their stakes in getting us back to work, which could mean jumping through more hoops for those not able.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...