Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tax Issue..... Help


tezza1234
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3735 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please move if in wrong place, its involving HMRC so figured here would be ok.

 

Basically i went self employed starting up my own business on 17th June 2012, Before this i was always a employee working in different industries, ive only ever had 9 weeks when i had to claim JSA.

 

So my 1st tax return is due by 31st January 2014 (im doing it now) so having logged on to the HMRC page its telling me i have a £100 fine for late fileing of tax return for the year 2011-2012, Well i was a employee, tax and NI was automatically taken out of my wages and i know the right amount was paid, i was only in the 1 job for most of that tax year.

So rang the tax office up who told me i owed £594 in tax + £100 fine for the year 2011-2012, so now im all rather confused, obviously i want to contest this, Why did they want me to submit a tax return (which i didnt know about) for a year i was a employee.

 

As said my self employment started June 2012 so should not be anything to do with that.

 

Im as confused as hell, I think there has been a big balls up somewhere which is not down to me but ive got to do all the running around proving my innocence, Anyone any advice.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear, end of financial years paperwork must always be kept safely. I'm not sure a duplicate is possible, but you could ask you ex employer if they can supply one.

 

Make sure you keep all your business paperwork safe and 10 years is favorable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear, end of financial years paperwork must always be kept safely. I'm not sure a duplicate is possible, but you could ask you ex employer if they can supply one.

 

Make sure you keep all your business paperwork safe and 10 years is favorable.

 

I fully agree with you, my own silly fault, i will look again of course. Im still confused as to why the HMRC feel i should have submitted a tax return for a year i was a employee. and i am 100% certain its a fault and wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Conniff suspects correctly - a duplicate P60 is not available.

 

If I may ask, while you were an employee, were you a higher rate taxpayer?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, that does seem odd if you were an employee and basic rate taxpayer for the whole of the tax year in question. Probably best if we bump this over to the HMRC subforum for now.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, that does seem odd if you were an employee and basic rate taxpayer for the whole of the tax year in question. Probably best if we bump this over to the HMRC subforum for now.

 

That would be good, thank you, Odd is 1 word for it, This morning all was good, preparing to start my 1st tax return, paperwork all ready to go, to be hit with HMRC saying i owe £594 in tax + a £100 fine for a time i was not responsible for paying my own tax and NI, Fuming or what.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they able to tell you what source this was from?

 

If it is from your employment and you haven't paid enough tax, it is still your liability even if employer error.

 

Did you have any benefits in kind as an employee, untaxed bank interest, property income etc?

 

The tax bill for £18000 income would be around £2100 and NIC £1247. Do you have any payslips or anything from that time? P60? P45?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they able to tell you what source this was from?

 

Did you have any benefits in kind as an employee, untaxed bank interest, property income etc?

 

The tax bill for £18000 income would be around £2100 and NIC £1247. Do you have any payslips or anything from that time? P60? P45?

 

Hi, thanks for reply, Yes i have some wage slips, am still looking for p45 - p60, there were not any benefits/bonuses, and yes those approx tax and NI figures do seem about what i paid, This is all just a little strange.

Im assuming ill have as long as i need to get to the bottom of this, what is the protocol if the tax office say you owe x amount, what does the debt come under.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Find out exactly where they think this income is from then go from there.

 

Sorry what do you mean what does the debt come under?

 

There is information on their website about repaying - http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/payinghmrc/index.htm

 

What i mean sorry is is it like a council tax debt ie full on, fast, court ect.... or a civil thing ie they have to go to CC and get a CCJ ect....

 

Your right about point 1, i need to find this out

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can take you to court etc but there's loads of steps along the way before that e.g. you can make repayment plans if you can't pay in full, there's appeals processes etc.

 

If you find the reason then post back I'll try have a look into the specifics for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can take you to court etc but there's loads of steps along the way before that e.g. you can make repayment plans if you can't pay in full, there's appeals processes etc.

 

If you find the reason then post back I'll try have a look into the specifics for you.

 

Thats wonderful, im glad there are still appeals processes as i have a feeling someone somewhere has made a boob and im sure it is not me.

 

Will post back asap

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok some more info, I found every pay slip for job in question but no p45 or p60, But from wage slips it all adds up, I manually checked the figures and tax and NI was spot on, How do i find out where HMRC are claiming this tax is due from

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't say for sure what's happened, but I have had penalties levied against me simply in order to jolt me into getting in touch with HMRC.

 

I was (briefly) a higher rate taxpayer when I lived down in London and worked IT. However, I became unwell, quit the job and moved to Glasgow. After that I spent three years in the USA, but I forgot to submit tax returns for the year before I left, and then of course I earned nothing in the UK for a while as I was resident elsewhere.

 

Then I returned to the UK, and was greeted by a letter from HMRC demanding £2500 in penalties for not filing SA returns. I wrote them a polite letter explaining the situation, and they withdrew the charges.

 

My point is, they can be reasonable if you cooperate and politely show them you've done nothing wrong. Whether that's appropriate in your case, I dunno.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Tax office can be very reasonable and usually are if the taxpayer is genuine or has genuine reason for not filing.

 

Do you suggest phoning them or are there local tax offices, With me the plot thickens, I submitted my first tax return for being SE, and then submitted this other tax return from when i was a employee, So this £594 i was supposed to owe in tax + £100 late filing fine has resulted in me getting a £300+ rebate minus the £100 fine which they have taken from rebate.

This is all just going to get so messy, I don't know who to call or where to go. Is it really as easy as a phone call.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PAYE Enquiry Line for Employers may be able to help

 

 

Opening hours

8.00 am to 8.00 pm, Monday to Friday

8.00 am to 4.00 pm Saturday

 

Closed Sundays, Christmas Day, Boxing Day and New Year's Day

 

 

0300 200 3200

Link to post
Share on other sites

PAYE Enquiry Line for Employers may be able to help

 

 

Opening hours

8.00 am to 8.00 pm, Monday to Friday

8.00 am to 4.00 pm Saturday

 

Closed Sundays, Christmas Day, Boxing Day and New Year's Day

 

 

0300 200 3200

 

The employer helpline can only help employers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The employer helpline can only help employers.

 

Call who then :/

Its clear to me that this is there balls up big style and i have indeed overpaid and not underpaid on tax, but as usual i am joe customer who has to run around trying to get my own money back, its so frustrating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...