Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help DWP chasing 13 year Old Debt


Mark71
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3662 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The DWP are exempt in as much that they cannot take any enforcement action after six years i.e they cannot get a court order or attachement of earnings, but they can deduct overpayments from future benefits.

 

You should contact DWP and ask for a detailed explanation of how the alleged debt has occured.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Tho they should have some type of proof of the overpayment personall i would demand proof.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

How odd it is well known that such debts can become statute barred,but the

DWP can make deductions from benefits after that.

The DWP is not a company!!!

Mosst of the above is nonsense

 

Unapproving the post PM sent

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

How odd it is well known that such debts can become statute barred,but the

 

The limitation act 'bars the remedy, but not the right' - these means any creditor can recover the money via alternative methods but court. As such if anyone goes back onto the same benefit it's perfectly legal for the DWP/HMRC/Whoever to claw back the overpayment that way. Frustrating but perfectly allowed.

 

This is an old thread we've just revived, haha.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The limitation act 'bars the remedy, but not the right' - these means any creditor can recover the money via alternative methods but court. As such if anyone goes back onto the same benefit it's perfectly legal for the DWP/HMRC/Whoever to claw back the overpayment that way. Frustrating but perfectly allowed.

 

This is an old thread we've just revived, haha.

I sense a bit of trolling here:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
also bear in mind that with DWP overpayments the 6 yeras runs from the date they first demand the money back.

 

Have had a contact from freds in recent times telling me that DWP over payments are not stat barred. Alleged over payment was made in 2000 - only just heard from them.

 

But according to freds DWP sent letter demanding payment to my old address in 2011 - so if that is their first demand for payment - would take this up to 2017 before it becomes SB?

 

We left that address in 2007 - so even if they sent a first request for payment, the day after we moved out it would still be 6 7 years after the original debt.

 

So how long do they get to send the first demand?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have had a contact from freds in recent times telling me that DWP over payments are not stat barred. Alleged over payment was made in 2000 - only just heard from them.

 

But according to freds DWP sent letter demanding payment to my old address in 2011 - so if that is their first demand for payment - would take this up to 2017 before it becomes SB?

 

We left that address in 2007 - so even if they sent a first request for payment, the day after we moved out it would still be 6 7 years after the original debt.

 

So how long do they get to send the first demand?

 

The limitation period begins on the date when the final determination is made that there is a recoverable overpayment and what that amount is. Therefore, this could be the original decision by the decision maker or, if the case is appealed further up the line, when that final decision (of the original decision) is made. Your question, is a very good one, as they should look to make their decisions quickly and not take forever to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also it must be remembered that the DWP can reclaim an overpayment even when the matter has become SB, the department is allowed to make deductions from relevant benefits including state pension and pension credit at anytime the client becomes eligible for the benefit.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

DWP tell me I have debts from 2002 - I told them they were barred.

 

He said they will not take it to court but can deduct from benefits or do an attachment to earnings - I'm not fussed about deductions from benefits, as I don't have any, but can they do a DEO?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they can Welfare Reform Act allows them to make such orders, and can deduct from ANY future benefit payment including state pension when you are eligible.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers. It's under £300, and from 2002 - Can I get them to reconsider?

 

According to CAB:

 

DWP guidance for decision makers states that recovery of a debt should be abandoned and the balance written off where the debt is:-

 

•under £25; or

•under £100 and at least six years have elapsed since the last repayment or deduction took place; or

•under £300 and at least ten years have elapsed since the last repayment or deduction took place; or

•over £300 and at least 20 years have elapsed since the last repayment or recovery took place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can certainly try, you may though have to go through an appeal Tribunal.

 

 

Write to the Manager

 

 

DWP Debt Management.

 

 

Be prepared to wait for a response.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Cheers. It's under £300, and from 2002 - Can I get them to reconsider?

 

According to CAB:

 

DWP guidance for decision makers states that recovery of a debt should be abandoned and the balance written off where the debt is:-

 

•under £25; or

•under £100 and at least six years have elapsed since the last repayment or deduction took place; or

•under £300 and at least ten years have elapsed since the last repayment or deduction took place; or

•over £300 and at least 20 years have elapsed since the last repayment or recovery took place.

 

Do we have a link to this guidance and can they say link three social fund loans together to go over the £300 threshold for 10 years

Link to post
Share on other sites

Such debts have been linked for recovery in the past.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This may be okay if you are not currently on benefits, but if you are, and this has happened to my sister, a debt from 15 years ago and no paperwork provided but a regular amount was automatically taken off her benefits weekly to pay that debt that she couldn't even remember.

Hi

 

I have a friend that works for DWP and was told that they have to chase the debt but if you just keep refusing to pay they will eventually just give up, he says sometimes in his mind he just wants to shout dont pay but he is monitored so cannot give any indication to the caller. Hope this helps.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DWP will commence pressing for payment however old a debt is as soon as the individual gets any benefit.

I have seen a man of 65 receive a letter regarding a 25 year old loan the day after he received his first state pension payment.

 

 

These debts don't go away that easily.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...