Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A full-scale strike at the firm could have an impact on the global supply chains of electronics.View the full article
    • He was one of four former top executives from Sam Bankman-Fried's firms to plead guilty to charges.View the full article
    • The private submersible industry was shaken after the implosion of the OceanGate Titan sub last year.View the full article
    • further polished WS using above suggestions and also included couple of more modifications highlighted in orange are those ok to include?   Background   1.1  The Defendant received the Parking Charge Notice (PCN) on the 06th of January 2020 following the vehicle being parked at Arla Old Dairy, South Ruislip on the 05th of December 2019.   Unfair PCN   2.1  On 19th December 2023 the Defendant sent the Claimant's solicitors a CPR request.  As shown in Exhibit 1 (pages 7-13) sent by the solicitors the signage displayed in their evidence clearly shows a £60.00 parking charge notice (which will be reduced to £30 if paid within 14 days of issue).  2.2  Yet the PCN sent by the Claimant is for a £100.00 parking charge notice (reduced to £60 if paid within 30 days of issue).   2.3        The Claimant relies on signage to create a contract.  It is unlawful for the Claimant to write that the charge is £60 on their signs and then send demands for £100.    2.4        The unlawful £100 charge is also the basis for the Claimant's Particulars of Claim.  No Locus Standi  3.1  I do not believe a contract with the landowner, that is provided following the defendant’s CPR request, gives MET Parking Services a right to bring claims in their own name. Definition of “Relevant contract” from the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4,  2 [1] means a contract Including a contract arising only when the vehicle was parked on the relevant land between the driver and a person who is-   (a) the owner or occupier of the land; or   (b) Authorised, under or by virtue of arrangements made by the owner or occupier of the land, to enter into a contract with the driver requiring the payment of parking charges in respect of the parking of the vehicle on the land. According to https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/44   For a contract to be valid, it requires a director from each company to sign and then two independent witnesses must confirm those signatures.   3.2  The Defendant requested to see such a contract in the CPR request.  The fact that no contract has been produced with the witness signatures present means the contract has not been validly executed. Therefore, there can be no contract established between MET Parking Services and the motorist. Even if “Parking in Electric Bay” could form a contract (which it cannot), it is immaterial. There is no valid contract.  Illegal Conduct – No Contract Formed   4.1 At the time of writing, the Claimant has failed to provide the following, in response to the CPR request from myself.   4.2        The legal contract between the Claimant and the landowner (which in this case is Standard Life Investments UK) to provide evidence that there is an agreement in place with landowner with the necessary authority to issue parking charge notices and to pursue payment by means of litigation.   4.3 Proof of planning permission granted for signage etc under the Town and country Planning Act 1990. Lack of planning permission is a criminal offence under this Act and no contract can be formed where criminality is involved.   4.4        I also do not believe the claimant possesses these documents.   No Keeper Liability   5.1        The defendant was not the driver at the time and date mentioned in the PCN and the claimant has not established keeper liability under schedule 4 of the PoFA 2012. In this matter, the defendant puts it to the claimant to produce strict proof as to who was driving at the time.   5.2 The claimant in their Notice To Keeper also failed to comply with PoFA 2012 Schedule 4 section 9[2][f] while mentioning “the right to recover from the keeper so much of that parking charge as remains unpaid” where they did not include statement “(if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met)”.     5.3         The claimant did not mention parking period, times on the photographs are separate from the PCN and in any case are that arrival and departure times not the parking period since their times include driving to and from the parking space as a minimum and can include extra time to allow pedestrians and other vehicles to pass in front.    Protection of Freedoms Act 2012   The notice must -   (a) specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;  22. In the persuasive judgement K4GF167G - Premier Park Ltd v Mr Mathur - Horsham County Court – 5 January 2024 it was on this very point that the judge dismissed this claim.  5.4  A the PCN does not comply with the Act the Defendant as keeper is not liable.  No Breach of Contract   6.1       No breach of contract occurred because the PCN and contract provided as part of the defendant’s CPR request shows different post code, PCN shows HA4 0EY while contract shows HA4 0FY. According to PCN defendant parked on HA4 0EY which does not appear to be subject to the postcode covered by the contract.  6.2         The entrance sign does not mention anything about there being other terms inside the car park so does not offer a contract which makes it only an offer to treat,  Interest  7.1  It is unreasonable for the Claimant to delay litigation for  Double Recovery   7.2  The claim is littered with made-up charges.  7.3  As noted above, the Claimant's signs state a £60 charge yet their PCN is for £100.  7.4  As well as the £100 parking charge, the Claimant seeks recovery of an additional £70.  This is simply a poor attempt to circumvent the legal costs cap at small claims.  7.5 Since 2019, many County Courts have considered claims in excess of £100 to be an abuse of process leading to them being struck out ab initio. An example, in the Caernarfon Court in VCS v Davies, case No. FTQZ4W28 on 4th September 2019, District Judge Jones-Evans stated “Upon it being recorded that District Judge Jones- Evans has over a very significant period of time warned advocates (...) in many cases of this nature before this court that their claim for £60 is unenforceable in law and is an abuse of process and is nothing more than a poor attempt to go behind the decision of the Supreme Court v Beavis which inter alia decided that a figure of £160 as a global sum claimed in this case would be a penalty and not a genuine pre-estimate of loss and therefore unenforceable in law and if the practice continued, he would treat all cases as a claim for £160 and therefore a penalty and unenforceable in law it is hereby declared (…) the claim is struck out and declared to be wholly without merit and an abuse of process.”  7.6 In Claim Nos. F0DP806M and F0DP201T, District Judge Taylor echoed earlier General Judgment or Orders of District Judge Grand, stating ''It is ordered that the claim is struck out as an abuse of process. The claim contains a substantial charge additional to the parking charge which it is alleged the Defendant contracted to pay. This additional charge is not recoverabl15e under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4 nor with reference to the judgment in Parking Eye v Beavis. It is an abuse of process from the Claimant to issue a knowingly inflated claim for an additional sum which it is not entitled to recover. This order has been made by the court of its own initiative without a hearing pursuant to CPR Rule 3.3(4)) of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998...''  7.7 In the persuasive case of G4QZ465V - Excel Parking Services Ltd v Wilkinson – Bradford County Court -2 July 2020 (Exhibit 4) the judge had decided that Excel had won. However, due to Excel adding on the £60 the Judge dismissed the case.  7.8        The addition of costs not previously specified on signage are also in breach of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, Schedule 2, specifically paras 6, 10 and 14.   7.9        It is the Defendant’s position that the Claimant in this case has knowingly submitted inflated costs and thus the entire claim should be similarly struck out in accordance with Civil Procedure Rule 3.3(4).   In Conclusion   8.1        I invite the court to dismiss the claim.  Statement of Truth  I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.   
    • Well the difference is that in all our other cases It was Kev who was trying to entrap the motorist so sticking two fingers up to him and daring him to try court was from a position of strength. In your case, sorry, you made a mistake so you're not in the position of strength.  I've looked on Google Maps and the signs are few & far between as per Kev's MO, but there is an entrance sign saying "Pay & Display" (and you've admitted in writing that you knew you had to pay) and the signs by the payment machines do say "Sea View Car Park" (and you've admitted in writing you paid the wrong car park ... and maybe outed yourself as the driver). Something I missed in my previous post is that the LoC is only for one ticket, not two. Sorry, but it's impossible to definitively advise what to so. Personally I'd probably gamble on Kev being a serial bottler of court and reply with a snotty letter ridiculing the signage (given you mentioned the signage in your appeal) - but it is a gamble.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Portfolio chasing old HFC debt - Statue Barrred?


Wonderwall1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3075 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

BB

You know as well as I do that not being on your credit file means didly squat about SB.

 

They have not found him but they have found a previous address.

 

I think I would suggest contacting them with something like this

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Ref: XXXXXXXX

 

Under the provisions of The Consumer Credit (EU Directive) Regulations 2010 and also c.39 (s.74 (A&B) (VA)) CCA(1974) I wish to formally request a copy of the original overdraft agreement and relevant paperwork that you should be sending me annually, for the above numbered bank account with [enter bank name here].

 

As I held what can only be regarded as an 'Agreed Overdraft', which has now reverted to an 'Unauthorised Overdraft' then the lending becomes regulated in line with c.39 Part VA (s.74) (s.1(b)) CCA1974 meaning the normal rules and CCA(1974) protection applies to this account.

 

You should be sending an annual reminder to me regards the overdraft, as well as copies of the original agreement made and an annual renewal form that contains the relevant prescribed terms that are clearly outlined in s.74(A)2(a,b,c,d,e). I highlight this provision for your perusal;

s.74A(2) The current account agreement must include the following information at the time it is made:

(a)the rate of interest charged on the amount by which an account-holder overdraws on the current account or exceeds the pre-arranged overdraft limit,

(b)any conditions applicable to that rate,

©any reference rate on which that rate is based,

(d)information on any changes to the rate of interest (including the periods that the rate applies and any conditions or procedure applicable to changing that rate), and

(e)any other charges payable by the debtor under the agreement (and the conditions under which those charges may be varied).

You should also be paying attention to s.74(B)(2) which reads, I quote;

s.74B(2) The matters referred to in subsection (1) are:

(a)the fact that the current account is overdrawn or the overdraft limit has been exceeded,

(b)the amount of that overdraft or excess,

©the rate of interest charged on it, and

(d)any other charges payable by the debtor in relation to it (including any penalties and any interest on those charges).

Therefore in line with the above, please could you send me what you should have been doing annually and have not been, to allow me to take whatever action I deem appropriate.

 

I trust that I have set out the position clearly and I await your response with the requested information.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Sign Digitally

Head it formal complaint

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would ignore them completely until they send something of substance. All they have sent so far is a notice of Assignment.

 

The OP states than no acknowledgement has been made in 6 years , nor payment so if they send anything to the OP, the only thing that needs to be sent back is the SB letter. Not a letter for any agreements. If its SB, lowell will say you paid a random amount in late 2007/early 2008. Then when you challenge them, theyll say its an "admin error".

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you don't know for SURE the debts are SB'd DONT send the SB letter.

that can be classed as acking the debt & resets the 6yrs SB clock.

 

as for the cra stuff.

 

its a whole lot better as BB says to get the cra file

and use your real address.

 

then check ALL your old addresses are linked.

 

if they send an SD or a claimform to your old address you've NO defence. [sent to wrong ad one]

 

even if it does wake them up to where you are

it'll take then/you a good few months to run through the CCa lark

to check the debts are properly assign

 

esp if they have been sold.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The simple fact is the tracing methods used today will find on the ER or not, any account or service you use will be sharing your data.

 

As BB says use the CRAs even try Noddle from call credit which is free always.

 

This is the only way you can assess your debts.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of good advice there.

 

As DX says you need to be 100% sure it is SB.

I know that on my current account it was some months from me last making any payment into it before they defaulted then terminated the account

so the 6 years from last payment would not work for me, its nearer 7 years.

(We had a good 6-9 months of please clear your unauthorised OD to we are withdrawing your OD to we are closing your account please pay us.

 

I perfectly understand why you would want to hide

but it may not be the best option in the long run.

 

As you have no bank account you may have some difficulty getting your credit report as they will want to see proof of ID

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

UPDATE -

 

I wanted to get into 2014 to ensure that my debts should be SB now

( I know for a fact that I have not paid a penny to any creditor since 1/12/07),

so technically they should all be SB

( unless of course they all have CCJ's attached to them, in which case none of them are/ever will be SB).

 

Letters still flowing to my dads address from Lowells, and again I have just been marking them as return to sender/does not live here ( which is not a lie as I do not live there).

 

Getting a bit worried now though because I read all over the internet that Lowells are very fond of making you bankrupt!!!

 

I want to get my credit report, but I don't have a bank account and am petrified of putting my current address down anywhere ( not even on voters roll etc).

 

I have a funny feeling that Lowells wont just go away.

 

What should I do?

 

I want to just write to Lowells with all the great letter templates on here, but on the other hand I don't.

 

HELP!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is still with Lowells and not passed to any Solicitors,

then it appears they are not currently seeking enforcement.

 

Which begs the question, as to whether Lowells already know it is not a debt they can go to court with.

 

You could therefore wait to see whether Lowells pass the debt to anyone else,

by at least checking what they are sending you.

Steam the letters open and send them back if they are just asking for your money.

 

You could send the original creditors an SAR,

for copies of all documents including statements.

 

You could check Trustonline for any CCJ's without giving your current address away.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks unclebulgaria.

 

I have been steaming the letters and they are just asking me to contact them,

I think one of them offering a reduction etc etc.

They all get sent back after reading.

I will look into Trustonline as would be good to know if I have any CCJs ( ref: SB ).

 

Both debts are current accounts,

how does that affect SB? / Letters I should send?

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps more tricky with current accounts, as you would need to know when the bank defaulted the accounts.

 

They may have kept the accounts going for a number of months, adding charges, before they eventually defaulted them.

If you wanted to make sure you could SAR the banks.

 

If Lowells thought they could take to court, they would have done so by now or have Sols threatening this.

 

In your shoes, I would just check Trustonline for now to make sure no CCJ's.

 

Perhaps at some point you will summon the courage to check your credit history and if these debts are not on there, then they are most likely to be statute barred.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh so SB doesnt happen until 6 years after the Default Notice?

 

I just checked Trustonline - 1 CCJ for £3k in April 2008.

 

I suppose I would have to contact Northampton Court on Monday to find out the claimant?

It could be 1 of the current accounts, but just a "could".

 

Also you say Lowells would of issued SD by now,

but I have only been receiving letters from November 2013,

surely they don't issue that quick anyway do they??

 

Thanks again, a great help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The successful claimant has 6 years from the CCJ date to gain enforcement. The could go to court to ask for more time, but this is not often allowed apparently. You could enquire with Northampton Court, but not sure of the point, unless you are looking to settle. They could tell you the claimant name, which might be useful I suppose.

 

If during 2014 these debts will become statute barred or no further enforcement can be carried out, then I am not sure why you would want to making enquiries about them, unless you really wanted to deal with them.

 

Keep an eye on the post and see what is being said. If they want to enforce further, you will get something in the post, court claim or Solicitors letter saying that they will be taking court action.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

pers i'd let them run.

 

esp as you've had discount offers

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The successful claimant has 6 years from the CCJ date to gain enforcement. The could go to court to ask for more time, but this is not often allowed apparently. You could enquire with Northampton Court, but not sure of the point, unless you are looking to settle. They could tell you the claimant name, which might be useful I suppose. - I would like to know if the CCJ is for the debt Lowells are chasing - if it is then the 6 year SB doesn't count, I suppose they have until 04/14 ( 6 years from the CCJ ) to enforce the CCJ or after that they cant.

 

If during 2014 these debts will become statute barred or no further enforcement can be carried out, then I am not sure why you would want to making enquiries about them, unless you really wanted to deal with them. - If current accounts are SB 6 years from the DEFAULT NOTICE date, how do I find out when they were defaulted ( Credit Report ? )

 

Keep an eye on the post and see what is being said. If they want to enforce further, you will get something in the post, court claim or Solicitors letter saying that they will be taking court action.

- Wont it be too late when I get a Statutory Demand or Enforcement of CCJ letter to do the whole letter template thing ( SB / SAR etc...)?

Help very much appreciated, you don't know me from adam, but are helping, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

- Wont it be too late when I get a Statutory Demand or Enforcement of CCJ letter to do the whole letter template thing ( SB / SAR etc...)?

Help very much appreciated, you don't know me from adam, but are helping, thank you.

 

If you are eager to deal with these debts, then go for it. Find out who go the CCJ, get your credit report. Send off CCA's for any relevant debt ( not the CCJ one) and SAR's.

 

At the moment they don't know where you are living and Lowells are offering you discounts.

 

The choice is yours. Cannot make it for you.

Edited by honeybee13
Name change

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are eager to deal with these debts, then go for it. Find out who go the CCJ, get your credit report. Send off CCA's for any relevant debt ( not the CCJ one) and SAR's. - I don't want to deal with them , I just don't want to find out they made me bankrupt when there MIGHT of been something I could of done to prevent it.

 

At the moment they don't know where you are living and Lowells are offering you discounts. - I thought they could make me bankrupt irrespective of knowing my current address or not? - Them offering discounts - I assume you mean that with them offering discounts they think that its unlikely to go for a BO?

 

The choice is yours. Cannot make it for you.- Appreciate that, just worried.

 

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Find out the claimant for the CCJ first and post back when you find out.

 

Do you actually know what debts you have and roughly when any defaults might have been added ? If so, can you provide a rough list of what they are ? Type of debt, roughly when you took the account out and roughly when you defaulted.

 

DCA's generally offer discounts, because the type of debt might indicate loads of charges, the CCA might not be available enforceable or it could be statute barred.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Find out the claimant for the CCJ first and post back when you find out.

 

Do you actually know what debts you have and roughly when any defaults might have been added ? If so, can you provide a rough list of what they are ? Type of debt, roughly when you took the account out and roughly when you defaulted.

 

DCA's generally offer discounts, because the type of debt might indicate loads of charges, the CCA might not be available enforceable or it could be statute barred.

 

 

Ok will post back when I get the info - Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Find out the claimant for the CCJ first and post back when you find out.

 

Do you actually know what debts you have and roughly when any defaults might have been added ? If so, can you provide a rough list of what they are ? Type of debt, roughly when you took the account out and roughly when you defaulted.

 

DCA's generally offer discounts, because the type of debt might indicate loads of charges, the CCA might not be available enforceable or it could be statute barred.

 

 

Okay,

 

spoke to the court today and

 

the CCJ IS the same debt Lowell are chasing.

 

After phoning Northampton Court, they told me it was transferred to my local county court.

I panicked over this as though that it had only recently been transferred,

but after speaking with Northampton a 2nd time they said it was transferred as soon as the judgement was granted.

 

So Lowells have a CCJ for the debt they are chasing,

and the 6 years to enforce it runs out in 70 days.

 

I am still trying to work out a way to get a credit report without revealing my current address

( only been here 2 years and not on voters, no credit here under my name ),

 

I have tried to use my wifes card to credit check my previous ( where all credit is registered ),

but it wont let me use her card,

and I cant do it by post as obviously it will be sent to the previous address!.

 

Shall I wait and see if Lowells try to enforce the CCJ through the County Court?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who actually got the CCJ ? You only mention it is the same debt.

 

It is quite often the case that creditors will sell on debts even if they have CCJ's.

 

I am a bit suspicious that Lowells were not the ones who obtained the CCJ,

 

as I don't think back in 2008 Lowells did this a lot.

 

Plus surely wouldn't they mention the CCJ in their letters?

 

Post back to confirm whether it was Lowells who were the claimant for the CCJ.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who actually got the CCJ ? You only mention it is the same debt.

 

It is quite often the case that creditors will sell on debts even if they have CCJ's. I am a bit suspicious that Lowells were not the ones who obtained the CCJ, as I don't think back in 2008 Lowells did this a lot. Plus surely wouldn't they mention the CCJ in their letters?

 

Post back to confirm whether it was Lowells who were the claimant for the CCJ.

 

 

The 1st letter I have had from Lowells (ever) was November 2013 at my fathers home.

 

Unless of course they were sending letters to my previous address ( left there April 2008 ) for the last 6 years which I doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claimant is the original creditor - HFC BANK PLC

 

So Lowells have no rights of enforcement under the CCJ and would have to apply to a court to be substituted.

This is not an easy process and therefore they don't really have much chance to do this before the 6 years runs out.

( At the moment HFC have the enforcement rights per the court, but they won't obviously because they have sold the debt on):madgrin:

 

So panic is therefore over, you don't have to worry about this.

 

I would wait until February has gone by to check your credit records,

just in case Lowells are alerted and make an urgent application to be substituted.

 

I presume that there is a court process,

 

where they could make an urgent application for it to be considered,

 

hence waiting until you know the 6 years has gone by.

Edited by honeybee13
Name change

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Lowells have no rights of enforcement under the CCJ and would have to apply to a court to be substituted. This is not an easy process and therefore they don't really have much chance to do this before the 6 years runs out. ( At the moment HFC have the enforcement rights per the court, but they won't obviously because they have sold the debt on):madgrin:

 

So panic is therefore over, you don't have to worry about this. I would wait until February has gone by to check your credit records, just in case Lowells are alerted and make an urgent application to be substituted. I presume that there is a court process, where they could make an urgent application for it to be considered, hence waiting until you know the 6 years has gone by.

 

 

Ah I see, I thought Lowells could apply to enforce it. The CCJ was granted Mid-April 2008, so you think 3 months isn't enough time for them to substitute?

 

 

Bet they send me a bloody SD instead!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...