Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
    • urm.. i seem to recall another assault case whereby the approved bailiff company claimed the body camera was nor theirs but a pers one of the bailiff, i think they got in serious trouble for it. i believe that breaks certain gov't approval for a bailiff company/firm regulations/laws  if memory serves me right?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

E.ON monthly bill suddenly increased from £107 to £250 please may I ask for advice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3819 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello first off before I ask for some advice I must sincerely say a big thanks to all the people who offer their time knowledge

and expertise in helping others on this forum,

the continued support offered and the positive impact it can have on peoples lives may be overlooked but is whole heartedly appreciated.

 

Today I am after some advice on what to say to E.ON because

 

they have suddenly increased my gas & electricity monthly direct debit from £107 to £250 for the next 12 months.

(they gave me 10 days notice in writing)

 

I feel this figure is unreasonably high for me to pay each month.

 

Over the last 2 years I was automatically set on a tariff and only ever advised by E.ON to pay £107 p/month to cover my usage,

 

Today it is now clear I wasn't paying enough each month and have now accumulated aprox £950 worth of debt.

(its hard for me to understand but apparantly my electricity and gas usage has nearly doubled although nothing has drastically changed ergonomically in my household).

 

I appreciate in retrospect I should have paid more attention to my annual statement and contacted them earlier to question my payments

however, according to their terms and conditions,

website pledges and the Energy Retail Association (ERA) Code of Practice for Accurate Bills,

 

E.ON "will take all reasonable steps to ensure your payments are set at the right level.

This includes reviewing your account proactively to make sure your payments are sufficient to cover your energy usage."

 

My argument is....

If E.ON had proactively reviewed my account early I would have been better informed,

and in a position to select a more effeciently priced tariff thus reducing my annual bill and subsequent debt.

 

Their are also ambiguities on my on-line accounts energy usage chart (i.e 4 months of paying less than £5 a month for electricity usage last year which makes no sense).

 

In summary i would like E.ON to reduce a percentage of my outstanding debt because to a degree their inefficiency has put me as a customer at a disadvantage,

 

I would also need them to lower my monthly direct debit payments to around £160. (this covers my usage and pays £10 toward the outstanding debt)

 

Questions

1. what would your advice be ?

2. Is telephoning best or should I write to E.ON ? and would It be best to deal with a manager or higher ?

3. What would be the best way of asking for a reviewed/reduced debt figure taking into account my personal circumstances

and their apparent proportional lack of proactively maintaining my account ?

4. Can I write them a notice / offer to pay say £10 p/month over 10 years to pay of the debt on top of my monthly tarrif ?

5. is there any powerfull legal terms i.e neglegence, I can use to get my point accross

 

Thanks in advance for looking at this really appreciate your advice :-)

 

Kind regards

 

 

Lee

Link to post
Share on other sites

who's been sending readings or reading the meter in all this time?

 

under the attached billing code

 

I don't think

they can rhetorically charge you passed 12mts because of 'their' mistake?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lee

 

You're right in the sense that EON should be reviewing the adequacy of your Direct Debit, however when a large bill is produced, they are allowed to off-set any payments already made.

 

if you have particular circumstances that would indicate a vulnerability then eon certainly should be able to offer a longer period of repayment, however the rate of £10 per month would probably not be accepted and they would normally offer a max of 12 months to repay.

 

i would suggest raising this as a complaint by emailing the directors office.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you have £950 debt, they need to recover this soon. Split over 12 months this is almost an additional £80 per month. However taking into consideration that during the summer your usage should halve perhaps a figure of £180 would be more acceptable than £250? I would also suggest that you check your bills to see when last you had an actual reading.

If you have not had an actual reading within the last 2 years, then the supplier may be on dodgy ground as regulations state that they should do an actual reading at least once every 2 years.

I would also suggest that in future, you supply readings to them at least once every 3 months. We supply readings every month to our supplier and our bill is always exact. As you have this debt, you are now locked into your current supplier for at least another year at their new increased prices and cannot change.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning Surfer01,

 

I'm sorry to read of the situation you're in, I do understand that this isn't very nice.

 

I agree with raising a complaint as this needs to be investigated fully. This is the first thing to do.

 

How have you been receiving your bills? Online, through the post? Have you seen the balance growing as each statement has been produced?

 

Or has the account been estimated for some time and now we have received an accurate read the account billed up to date which has caused a catch up bill.

 

When did we last read the meter? When did you last provide a read to us? We need to read the meter once every two years.

 

I'm sorry as this sounds like a lot of questions, but this is some of the things that will get looked in to, so it's always good to have an idea.

 

Once the account has been fully reviewed we will certainly be able to offer a payment arrangement, but paying £10 per month towards the balance really won't be accepted I'm afraid.

 

In these sorts of circumstances we may offer for the balance to paid back over the length of time it has taken to build up.

 

I do hope this is resolved for you quickly.

 

Helena

Link to post
Share on other sites

Helena, your post clearly demonstrates that you do not take the time to read posts correctly which is why you answered the OP incorrectly. The OP is "lstreet" and not myself as I was only making a suggestion having worked in the utilities industry .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Helena, your post clearly demonstrates that you do not take the time to read posts correctly which is why you answered the OP incorrectly. The OP is "lstreet" and not myself as I was only making a suggestion having worked in the utilities industry .

 

I'm sorry, you're correct this is my mistake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...