Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
    • Well, they trashed their last election manifesto pledges, so nothing new really is it? They just find weasel words to try to claim they haven't actually failed if you just look at it just a little squinted and in this particular way  - and are stupid.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help! Parking Eye Court Claim Form- Private Land w/ no 'free stay'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3855 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You are not submitting a defence yet, you are writing back to acknowledge the claim and denying it in its entirety and a full defence will be submitted within the time allowed. That gives you more time to prepare a full defence when necessary. You will then fill out the allocation questionnaire and choose a county court local or convenient to you.

Dont state that you want to know things, find out who the landowner is and ask them to provide proof of transferrence of their rights to PE. They may well not do this and it will cost you a few quid to force the issue so I wouldnt bother than going further than asking. As I said, there is a time and a form for asking for sight of the contract, it used to be called "discovery" but is dealt with on a separate court form so dont be putting anything on yours, just the Ack of service bits and the allocation.

If nothing else, this will make PE pay for the allocation and thus have to turn up or let the matter drop by being timed out on the allocation fee. There are pluse and minuses to this, a very strong defence, such as being the landowner yourself (are you reading Euro Car Parks?), would make them drop this hot potato but generally having more time gives you the advantage, even if they decide to pay the £40 to continue.

 

 

I have already submitted the acknowledgement so just trying to gather everything for the next step. Do they send more forms now I've done this or do I just use the original ones and get them back to the court within the time limit?

 

I've now emailed the hotel to enquire about who owns the land. I'll see if they respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You now wait for PE to pay the allocation fee and gety a court appearance time. In the meanwhile you gather your evidence for the time that it has to be submitted by. Read all of the other posts in this section to see standard defences and for suggestions of what you will need to gather. You will get a chance to denand evidence from PE, you will need to know exactly what they are claiming so your defence rebuts the case they are making and more. They should have sent you details of their claim, if not you need to write to the court and ask for the cklaim to be struck out if they havent sent them in time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You now wait for PE to pay the allocation fee and gety a court appearance time. In the meanwhile you gather your evidence for the time that it has to be submitted by. Read all of the other posts in this section to see standard defences and for suggestions of what you will need to gather. You will get a chance to denand evidence from PE, you will need to know exactly what they are claiming so your defence rebuts the case they are making and more. They should have sent you details of their claim, if not you need to write to the court and ask for the cklaim to be struck out if they havent sent them in time.

 

 

Okay so I should receive this in the post then? I presume this means I definitely have to attend a hearing? I haven't had any further 'details' other than the couple of sentences which are on the front of the court papers- what sort of thing should I expect to receive? When should they have sent this sort of thing by?

 

I actually contacted the hotel to enquire who the landowner was and received a helpful reply from someone there. However must've been forwarded to PE as they've sent quite a nasty response really saying I'm not to contact any third parties as they are dealing with the claim and are authorised by the landowner to do so?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will get the allocation papers when they pay up. If they dont pay up you can have the claim struck out or just ignore the whole matter. The courts are rather busy so you wont hear anything for a several weeks but if you are worried you can phone the courts service at Northampton and quote the case number and they will tell you the progress of your case.

As for taking any notice of Parking Eye, I would ignore anything they say directly to you but keep it all as evidence of harassment, which you can counterclaim for. As for being authorised, how do you know unless you ask the landowner/occupier?

Dont forget that Parking Eye is reading your posts on here so they may not have got their infomation from the hotel but from your postings and applied it to their letters to pressure you into paying them the money they dont merit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I note that the Prankster has mentioned recently ParkingEye and their mailing system so I shall now try and explain why I asked you to request from ParkingEye of 'proof of postage'

 

It is believed that ParkingEye use an outsourced company called 'imail' to send out their letters etc.

 

The way this works is that ParkingEye's system populate the relevant generic letter that is to be sent out to the registered keeper. That letter is then sent in an electronic encrypted form to 'imail'

 

'imail' then un-encrypt (is there such a word?) the electronic message from ParkingEye and create a hard copy which is then enveloped and posted off to the registered keeper.

 

'imail' have a system that puts a unique reference number of every letter (the series of five or six digits just to the top right of the registered keepers name and address). This audit trail is essential because it a) proves that 'imail' have posted the letter and b) they can invoice ParkingEye accordingly.

 

The reference numbers put on the letters are sequential and therefore if there is a dispute as to whether a letter was actually posted or not, there is an evidential audit trail that can be produced if requested.

 

[This is what we believe is the system set up but because of commercial sensitivity we cannot confirm 100%]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.

 

I believe the 14 days (following the 5 days after the papers were issued) is up in around a week so we'll see what happens. If nothing comes through I shall ring the court to check.

 

Am I right in thinking that if they proceed and get the claim details sent within their time allowance, I don't actually prepare a written defence and it is dealt with in person in court?

 

I'm hoping if that's the case then citizen's advice can help with sorting out how I go about getting my own solicitor as I've never had to do anything like that so wouldn't know where to begin! I'm sure there's an option to defend yourself but would rather enlist someone who knows their way around the law. I presume if I had to pay a solicitor, I could claim the cost back should I win?

 

 

That's an interesting point on the mail system Nev Met. I wouldn't want to go in all guns blazing without concrete confirmation of who they use and how but very good to know that seems to be what's thought. Good to bring it up in case they can, and should be able to prove the letter was sent if indeed it was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

katcapstick.

 

Your timeline is as follows..

 

Date of issue XX + 5 days to acknowledge = XX + 14 days to acknowledge claim = XX + 14 days to submit a defence. If it is your intention to defend the claim, then you MUST acknowledge otherwise they will obtain a default judgment.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.

That's an interesting point on the mail system Nev Met. I wouldn't want to go in all guns blazing without concrete confirmation of who they use and how but very good to know that seems to be what's thought. Good to bring it up in case they can, and should be able to prove the letter was sent if indeed it was.

 

Give the tree a shake and see what falls.

 

Just simply ask them for proof of postage from their mail service provider and see what they come back with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I right in thinking that if they proceed and get the claim details sent within their time allowance, I don't actually prepare a written defence and it is dealt with in person in court?

 

I'm hoping if that's the case then citizen's advice can help with sorting out how I go about getting my own solicitor as I've never had to do anything like that so wouldn't know where to begin! I'm sure there's an option to defend yourself but would rather enlist someone who knows their way around the law. I presume if I had to pay a solicitor, I could claim the cost back should I win? ...

Wrong on all counts, I'm afraid.

 

You will certainly need to send a written defence. If not, they will automatically get Judgment against you.

 

Citizen's Advice are next to useless regarding private parking issues. They take their script from BPA Ltd propaganda.

 

Most high street solicitors aren't that clued up on this stuff, and if you find one who is, they will probably charge £2-300 for a court appearance, which you won't get back unless the Judge decides the other side has "behaved unreasonably".

Link to post
Share on other sites

katcapstick.

 

Your timeline is as follows..

 

Date of issue XX + 5 days to acknowledge = XX + 14 days to acknowledge claim = XX + 14 days to submit a defence. If it is your intention to defend the claim, then you MUST acknowledge otherwise they will obtain a default judgment.

 

I've already done the Acknowledgement online so that part is sorted.

 

 

 

Nev Met: Would you advise me emailing PE about the PoP asap or just bringing it up in my defence? I guess if they say they cannot provide such information then that's a point against them. It's just confusing on whether I should still be speaking to them now as previously they had said they weren't communicating with me on the matter then recently having been accused of harrassment I don't know where I stand on that front! Is it worth asking them for their contract w/ the landowner too or as others have suggested, there's some kind of form to request the document- though I don't really know and what stage and how I obtain this.

 

The solicitor thing is worrying as I would have to find someone in 14 days presumably to help with my defence. Or would the right course of action be to put together my own written defence the best I can following everyone on here's advice and then a solicitor gets involved when it goes to court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've already done the Acknowledgement online so that part is sorted.

Nev Met: Would you advise me emailing PE about the PoP asap or just bringing it up in my defence?

 

Absolutely, a simple email along the lines that I suggested

Link to post
Share on other sites

send a copy of the letter to the court when you get your allocation and inform them that it is your belief that Parking Eye are abusing the small claims procedure by using the claims process for intimidation rather than recovery of an alleged debt. Their paper output is certainly prolific in that manner, sending out reams of paper telling people how their barrister reckons they are on to a winner rather than just issuing the POPLA code requested. If it isnt designed to intimidate, why send the irrelevant gumf in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

does anyone know anything about the particulars you are meant to receive? I hear that when the claim is to do with a contract, a separate detailed set of particulars should be served containing a copy of the contract in its entirety.

 

I've not yet received such documents and I'm sure anyone who has seen the court forms will know that PE's 'particulars' are a pretty brief thing just on the front of the form.

 

I'm thinking of contacting the court and enquiring about this- good idea?

 

The defences I've seen tend to be bullet-pointed as if in answer to points point by the claimant (PE) but I don't feel I have enough to go off based on their particulars to do it like that.

 

If anyone has any knowledge on this please let me know.

 

 

I'd also like to see the contract between the landowner and PE, at what point can I request this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't usually send you the contract (probably because if they did it would show they haven't got the proper authority). What they might do is send out a "letter of authority", which is a meaningless piece of paper, produced by PE and signed by a lowly minion from the management agent or landlord.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you submit your defence there is a form that you can fill in to seek paperwork from the other side,it used to be called "discovery" but has a different name now, might be N180 but check with the court-you can phone Northampton and ask them. Otherwise ask the landowner for a copy and should they decline to oblige tell them that you can apply for a "Norwich Pharmacal Order" but would prefer to keep the costs to a minimum.

The land registry can supply the details of ownership to you for £3 and will prove useful if the land is leased as certain rights are often retained by the freeholder.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you submit your defence there is a form that you can fill in to seek paperwork from the other side,it used to be called "discovery" but has a different name now, might be N180 but check with the court-you can phone Northampton and ask them. Otherwise ask the landowner for a copy and should they decline to oblige tell them that you can apply for a "Norwich Pharmacal Order" but would prefer to keep the costs to a minimum.

The land registry can supply the details of ownership to you for £3 and will prove useful if the land is leased as certain rights are often retained by the freeholder.

 

 

I've emailed PE to request a copy of the contract between them and the landowner. They have not replied, quite strange as they've been quick to respond previously.

 

I also called the court to ask about this and they advised requesting it from the claimant and if they won't give you it, then it's something to add to your defence.

 

Hopefully looking to get a draft defence together this week and hoping some experienced members will be willing to take a read over it through a pm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A statement in your defence saying that you asked for a copy of the contract between the landowner or occupier and themselves that entitles PE to seek damages for breach of contract and trespass in their own name but PE refused to supply such a document. As their claim is based solely on this right it is imperative that the full proper document should be available to you and the court. Also ask for copy of the Planning Permission granted that allows them to place their advertising hoardings in the car park. Again, they will claim that it is deemed consent and they dont need it but it is not one of the categories of sign that deemed consent covers so stick with that one as well as it will void any contact so formed as being unconsionable. (you cannot be forced into a contract by way of a criminal activity)

Link to post
Share on other sites

post it up and you will get several opinions of what emphasis you should place on the various parts and what case law you want considered. You should have copies of the case law available for the judge and send to PE with your defence bundle.

PM's wont allow your helpers to see what others are thinking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...