Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Making F&F offer to NatWest Credit Cards


florish
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2339 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, hope you don't mind me posting this NatWest CCA once again

- hopefully I've done it better (and more readable) than I did almost 3 years ago!

 

As above it was a credit card taken out in 1997 and defaulted in 2006.

I pay NatWest £1 per month (although now managed by Wescot since 2016).

 

I CCA'd NatWest in 2014 and this is what they sent me:

An Application Form (pdf copy attached), signed by me but with none of the prescribed terms.

 

It was one of those Application Forms that when completed was folded and sealed then posted off to NatWest (you can just about see part of the mailing instructions at the top of the Application Form)

 

When I received the attached copy, NatWest also enclosed copies of all the prescribed terms plus info about ppi (8 pages worth) ; the separate pages of prescribed terms aren't numbered in way or signed by me or anyone or even referred to (as far as I can make out) on the original Application Form.

 

The quality of the attached copy is very poor and it was only by using a magnifying glass that I was able to identify a lot of the info on the Application Form.

 

My question is :

since I last posted about this almost 3 years ago, has anything changed?

Would the attached Application Form still be unenforceable in the opinion of the members of this Forum?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Florish

Bank Info 2.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Why are you asking?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OC don't do court

Have they not sold it on yet?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No dx, Natwest haven't sold it on yet.

 

Card taken out in 1997, then defaulted in 2006.

 

 

I've paid token payments since 2006.

 

 

In 2016 the account has been managed by Wescot but my £1 token payment is still remitted direct to NatWest.

 

Is that correct that NatWest never take court action against debtors?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no OC never does

too much bad publicity

 

 

your only issue is you are running the SB date to infinity by paying this blindly

as soon as the CCA failed you should stopped

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well no you never posted

them till today....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Received letter yesterday stating that NatWest have now sold the debt to Cabot.

It goes on to say that Wescot will still be managing the debt and all future payments (£1pm) should be remitted to Wescot.

 

Is this good or bad?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd stop paying, seriously, if they have flogged it on then Natpest, have got their profit out of you, and then some, and now Wetcloths are about to take their pound of flesh from you.

 

Seriously, you're being cash cowed now, they have you marked as a mug.

 

IMO if you still want to pay, then pay natpest direct, never ever pay Wetcloths.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bazooka, I can no longer pay NatWest direct surely!!! as they have definitely sold the debt to Cabot.

 

I probably should stop making the payments, but I'm just worried in case the application form/credit agreement (that I've attached to post #55 on this thread) is compliant, even though it doesn't have the prescribed terms on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If that is all they have, then you should have stopped paying years ago.

 

STOP paying otherwise you'll be a cashcow forever.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good

stop payments

send cabot a cca request

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

***UPDATE***

 

I haven't yet sent a CCA request to Cabot, but here's what I have done.

 

When I sent my CCA request to Natwest 3 years ago, they sent back a copy of the application form from 1997 that didn't include the prescribed terms (copy posted earlier in this thread).

 

However I can clearly see on the application form that I've ticked the box requesting PPI

Also when NatWest sent me the copy of the application form, they also sent me copies of the general terms and conditions for the PPI

informing me that the policy would be with Sun Alliance & London (no policy number).

 

So a couple of weeks ago I filled in the online PPI complaint form on the NatWest website.

A few days later I received two text messages on the same day from RBS-PPI

One telling me about the procedure and the time it should take.

The 2nd text amazingly informing me that they have already completed their investigation and that I should receive a letter from them within 10 working days.

 

A couple of days later I received a letter basically confirming what the first text message had stated.

Then the day after that, I received a letter stating that '...after conducting an extensive investigation...we can find no evidence that we have made a charge for Payment Protection Insurance in relation to the above account'

It goes on to say that if I can provide additional information or documentation that suggests that a PPI policy was sold with the product (credit card account) then to re-submit my request.

Other than that they've enclosed the FOS booklet.

 

Their 'extensive investigation' probably took a couple of minutes when they saw how old the account was.

It was opened in 1997 and defaulted in 2006, and I wouldn't imagine that I'd paid any PPI after 2006!

 

I have already sent for a SAR and it'll be interesting to see what they send me.

 

Any suggestions what I should do now? Should I just wait until the SAR info arrives and take it from there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes

But still send that CCA

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I sent NatWest a SAR request on the 15th September (which was signed for on receipt) but I haven't received anything from them as yet, and 58 days have now passed.

Is this normal for NatWest or should I be chasing them up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

give 'em a ring

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have 40 days to comply with your request, you can complain to the ICO if you wish, this usually gives them a boot up the rear end for fear of being fined.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I received all my SAR info in a huge envelope this morning delivered by courier.

 

The bulk of the envelope being made up of credit card statements from 2001 until November 2017.

 

I thought it a bit strange receiving a NatWest credit card statement for November 2017 as the debt was sold to Cabot in June 2017 and is still being managed by Wescot!

 

Perhaps their system just keeps generating the statements as if I was still a customer!

 

The CCA (application form) from 1997 included with the SAR info, is of even worse quality than the one they sent to me in 2014,

so perhaps now is the time for me to CCA Cabot!

Link to post
Share on other sites

told you to do that in post 68 10 weeks ago

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...