Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA Help needed urgently!


pompeyvix
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3858 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I am writing this on behalf of my mum.

 

My mum was claiming ESA (income based) as she has a psychiatric illness which prevents her from working. It is a severe illness which she has had a very long time.

 

She missed 3 assessment appointments (due to be overwhelmed with voices in her head, getting confused etc) and even though she explained why she hadn't attended the assessment, her ESA was stopped.

 

She lodged an appeal, but it has now been 3 and a half months and she has still not heard anything. She receives housing benefit and DLA, but these two benefits do not cover her rent and bills, let alone food on top. As a result she is using credit cards to survive and is getting further and further into debt.

 

Every time she phones for an update, she is told different information, but the crux of it is that no decision has been made on her appeal and they can't tell her when she is likely to hear.

 

She has asked for financial help, but has been told she is not eligible.

 

It's starting to get a desperate situation, and neither my mum or I know where to turn.

 

Can anyone help? Has anyone been in the same situation before? What should she be doing? Is there anything or is it just a waiting game?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has she made a formal appeal to the Tribunal, or has she asked for a DWP reconsideration? When she failed to attend the assessments, she should have been asked to provide "Good Cause". Was she asked this, and if so, did she respond?

 

Since she did not attend the assessments and that's why her ESA has been stopped, she would not be eligible for payments while awaiting a hearing at the Tribunal. If the DWP has passed the case on to the Tribunal, it could indeed be quite some time.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply.

 

I am not sure if she has made a formal appeal to the Tribunal or if she has asked the DWP for reconsideration. I will ask her that when I next speak to her.

 

I know she did respond and give reasons as to why she didn't attend the assessments.

 

The main concern is how my mum will cope without any money from now until her Tribunal. She is living off credit cards. What help is there? I've read something about an assessment rate whilst she is appealing, would she be eligible for this? If she is not eligible for financial help, how is she supposed to live?!

 

I am sorry for the basic questions, this is all new to me and I do not know anything about ESA or benefits in general.

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem, we're here to help.

 

The first key thing to note is that you mention the Assessment Rate while appealing. This is only available to someone who attended the assessment (WCA) at Atos but was found to be fit for work. Unfortunately, the fact that your Mum has not attended means this is a more difficult situation. ESA Assessment Rate is not payable under these circumstances.

 

There are other factors. If someone fails to attend a WCA, they would be sent a letter asking for "Good Cause" as to why they did not attend. Now, this matter is then considered by the DWP. In my experience, Good Cause is almost always accepted the first time, as long as the reason given is basically plausible. But after that, it gets more difficult - to the people who decide these things, multiple failures to attend simply look like noncompliance.

 

Should this situation arise again (that is, if she's asked to attend a WCA but her condition makes that difficult/impossible) then she should seek a home visit for the WCA. You or any other trusted friend or relative could be there. Such a request would need to be supported by evidence from her doctor.

 

OK, so, what to do? Well, I hate saying this, but I think she needs to expect to be without benefits for a while.

 

Precise further advice would really depend on whether she's asked for a reconsideration or an appeal.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again.

 

I;ve spoken to my mum's support worker this morning, and it seems she has asked them for reconsideration. She has however missed 3 appointments already :(

 

I know it's partly my mum's doing not attending the appointments and I can understand where they are coming from the the non compliance, but it purely because of her illness that she did not attend, not because she couldn't be bothered or anything.

 

How would she be expected to cope financially in this situation?

 

I feel so frustrated and helpless :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again.

 

I;ve spoken to my mum's support worker this morning, and it seems she has asked them for reconsideration. She has however missed 3 appointments already :(

 

I know it's partly my mum's doing not attending the appointments and I can understand where they are coming from the the non compliance, but it purely because of her illness that she did not attend, not because she couldn't be bothered or anything.

 

How would she be expected to cope financially in this situation?

 

I feel so frustrated and helpless :(

 

Hi just a quick one from my experience. When I had serious mental health issues I would hide my post and do some pretty strange things. My wife informed the DWP of this and I signed a form which allowed her to receive copies of my letters etc. I was just wondering if you could do the same. This was also the case when dealing with JPC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

: pompeyvix:

 

Unfortunately there's no time limit on Jobcentreplus for reconsiderations (asking Jobcentreplus to 'look at a decision again') but considering it's already three and a half months you need to know exactly what's happening, or not!

 

Some comments/suggestions which may help:

 

Try to find out, from your Mum or her support worker, whether she received and returned a BF223. There's an example of the form at;

 

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/mec_administration_guide_v6#incoming-354324

 

When Jobcentreplus decision makers are considering disallowance for 'failure to attend' they have to consider, 'the claimant's state of health at the relevant time' and 'the nature of any disability the claimant has'. Has your Mum submitted any supportive evidence, possibly from her support worker, of her impaired mental function?

 

If your Mum's agreeable get some third party authority (a la :mr_mastiff: ) in place so you can talk to Jobcentreplus on her behalf. In the meantime, while you're with your Mum so she can give verbal consent over the phone, ask Jobcentreplus for a call back from her benefit centre. You might find out how far this reconsideration has got, or not.

 

To the same end, subject access Jobcentreplus at her benefit centre for everything to do with your Mum's claim for employment n support. They don't charge for subject access.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dwp-request-for-personal-information

 

If all else fails;

 

Submit a formal appeal without waiting for reconsideration. Jobcentreplus will do one anyway as part of the appeals process. You'll need to explain why it's late; Mum couldn't cope cos of mental health issues. And send as much supportive evidence as possible; photocopies of Mum's medical records, statement from her support worker or yourself as her carer, anything else you can think of.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/gl24-if-you-think-our-decision-is-wrong

 

Your Mum will be able to reclaim employment n support, for the same condition, from six months after the date of disallowance. As well as pursuing an appeal.

 

Best wishes, Margaret. :panda:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...