Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Regretfully it does. Have you actually seen any papers which show what you were charged with (rather than what you were convicted of)? It is unusual not to be “dual charged” but if you were not charged with both, you are where you are. If you had been charged with both offences and providing you were the driver at the time, you could, after performing your SD, have asked the prosecutor to drop the “Fail to Provide” (FtP) charges in exchange for a guilty plea to the speeding charges (you cannot be convicted of speeding unless you plead guilty as they have no evidence you were driving). You will have difficulty defending the FtP charges. In fact, it’s worse than that – you have no chance of successfully defending them at all because the reason you did not respond to the requests is because you did not receive them and that’s entirely your fault. No it’s not correct. Six months from 18/11/23 was 18/5/24 so, unless they were originally charged, the speeding offences are now “timed out.” There is one avenue left open to you. If you perform your SD you must serve it on the court which convicted you. You will then receive a date for a hearing to have the matters heard again. Your only chance of having the matters revert to speeding (and this is only providing you were the driver at the time of those offences) is to plead Not Guilty, attend court. When you get there you can ask the prosecutor (very nicely, explaining what a pillock you know you were for failing to update your  V5C) if (s)he is prepared to raise “out of time” speeding charges, to which you will offer to plead guilty if the FtP charges are dropped.   This is strictly speaking not lawful. Charges have to be raised within six months. Some prosecutors are willing to do it, others are not. But frankly it’s the only avenue open to you. There is a risk with this. I imagine you have been fined £660 (plus surcharge and costs) for each offence. The offence attracts a fine of 1.5 week’s net income and where the court has no information about the defendant’s means a default figure of £440pw is used.  If the prosecutor is not prepared to play ball you can revise your pleas to guilty. A sympathetic court should give you the full discount (one third) for your guilty pleas in these circumstances but they may reduce the discount somewhat. The prosecution may also ask for increased costs (£90 or thereabouts is the figure for a guilty plea). So it may cost you more if you have a decent income (I’ll let you do the sums). But MS90 is an endorsement code which gives insurers a fit of the vapours. One such endorsement will see your premiums double. Two of them will see many insurers refuse to quote you at all meaning you will have to approach "specialist" (aka extortionate) brokers. So you really want to exhaust every possibility of avoiding MS90s if you can. One warning: do not pay solicitors silly money to defend you. Making an SD before a solicitor should attract just a nominal sum (perhaps a tenner). That’s all you should pay for. You have no viable defence against the FtP charges and any solicitor suggesting you have is telling you porkies. The offer to do the deal is easily done by yourself and you can save the solicitor’s fees to put towards a few taxis and increased insurance premiums if you are unsuccessful. In the happy event you find out you were "dual charged", let me know and I'll tell you how to proceed. (Seems a bit odd hoping you were charged with four driving offences rather than two, but it's a funny old world!).    
    • Just the sort of people you despise eh Jugg  You would be much happier among your mates in that room with Rayner begging for votes 
    • I see the trial of the real criminal in the Biden Family has started rather than the sham political persecution of Trump    Biden will of course try to distance himself as far as possible to no avail  Even more votes for The Donald🤣    
    • Savings platform Raisin UK is offering a £50 bonus for new customers who sign up for an account.View the full article
    • With Farage back in the news, here's a reminder of his interview with Claire Byrne on Irish TV a few years ago.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3904 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was wondering if someone would kindly, in laymans terms, explain the after the event insurance.

 

The reason why I ask is that one of my parents had a nerve operation in 2011 that hasn’t worked out at all and has seen my parent’s condition worsen to the point where she is struggling with day to day things. We are in the process of speaking to a solicitor of putting forward discussions or a case to the hospital in regards to claiming some compensation for this operation failure which they said would be fine etc.

 

The solicitor wants use to see whether our home insurance includes the above insurance as he said it would help with costs etc? Having briefly checked it, it seems to me that the solicitor wants us to do this so he gets some money back whether we win or lose so question his motives to be honest.

 

Would after the event insurance already be attached to my home insurance when I took out the latter policy or would it be something that I’d have to call up and add on?

 

Any advice thoroughly appreciated.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your Home Insurance is not an after the event policy in the true sense. Home Insurance legal expenses is just an Insurance that might help with legal costs up to a certain value. You normally have to use the Insurers own panel of Solicitors, but they may accept you using another Solicitor of your choice.

 

Unless your parents live with you and are part of your household, then your own Home Ins legal cover would not be able to help. It would be your parents Home Ins legal cover that would be the one that is relevant. But your parents would have to contact their Insurers claims department to start a claim and they will have to provide a lot of details, before they are advised whether they will receive any help with their legal costs.

 

After the event legal Insurance is a specific policy that you can take out, but I think the premium relates to the risks of going through a court process. It is protection against being liable for costs awarded by the court against you above a certain level.

 

Just going by your post, I would question whether this Solicitor you have seen is the right person to help. Either you have misunderstood what they have said or the Solicitor is not very good at explaining matters. You parents really need to see a Solicitor who specialises in medical cases.

Edited by unclebulgaria67

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

I agree with UB about seeing a different solicitor. I think you might even be able to do a medical case on a no win no fee basis. You can check the Law Society website for specialists in your part of the country.

 

My best, HB

 

Yes there may be no win no fee companies who can help. Be aware that currently most of these will want at least 25% of any award that is won.

 

If your parents have Home Ins legal cover, that may be best avenue to look at first, but I have my doubts as to whether they will be interested in a medical type claim. They can be very expensive to pursue as they can go on for a long time and need expert witness reports to be done. Unless your parents have a very good case that is documented, I suspect that the Insurers will decline.

 

So your parents are then left with looking for Solicitors that are best placed to help them.

 

I think you need to ascertain whether you need to go through the Hospitals complaints process first, before you go legal. Perhaps the Hospital Doctors did discuss the risks of the operation with your parents and your parents signed the form understanding the risks. If this is the case, then unless you have evidence from several medical experts saying that the operation was done wrongly or should not have been done at all, then I would think it would be difficult to proceed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless your parents live with you and are part of your household, then your own Home Ins legal cover would not be able to help. It would be your parents Home Ins legal cover that would be the one that is relevant. But your parents would have to contact their Insurers claims department to start a claim and they will have to provide a lot of details, before they are advised whether they will receive any help with their legal costs.

 

I live with my parents. It's my father who has the home insurance under his name so does that insurance cover all the people living in the house as the issue concerns my mother, rather than my father?

 

I think you need to ascertain whether you need to go through the Hospitals complaints process first, before you go legal. Perhaps the Hospital Doctors did discuss the risks of the operation with your parents and your parents signed the form understanding the risks. If this is the case, then unless you have evidence from several medical experts saying that the operation was done wrongly or should not have been done at all, then I would think it would be difficult to proceed.

 

We’ve already pursued things through the complaint process and received a response that we were expecting, i.e the surgeon saying he told us how the operation would go and the risks but the latter was not foreseen in the way that it has worked out for my mother.

 

We’ve spoken to a few medical professionals who’ve said they’ve never experienced a response to an operation, which is successful without issues, like it before.

 

It’s difficult for me, in a personal opinion, to ascertain whether what has happened is due to a mistake that’s being hidden or whether it was something unforeseen and it JUST happened. But I feel they completely ignored what my mother was saying to them in the early days after the operation, that she couldn’t feel her feet and struggling to urinate, and were dismissive rather than take that as urgent sign to investigate promptly.

 

And also, the solicitor said a bank account may include before and/or after the event insurance, again would this have needed to be something my mum would have needed to add onto her bank account?

 

Thank you for the responses, appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give the home insurance legal cover details to the solicitor and they will tell you if it covers the case. If it doesnt you can buy a policy that will cover your costs should you lose the case for about £75. It is basically a conditional fee insurance and is designed to pick up a proportion of the other sides costs

Link to post
Share on other sites

ATE is exactly what is says on the tin. It is insurance cover taken out after the event to protect you against any costs and disbursements you have to pay if you are lose the case at Court. I think the cost of an average policy these days is around £35.00 to £40.00 that you either pay out of your compensation if you win. Most policies are self insuring so you don't pay the premium if you lose.

 

 

BTE on the other hand is insurance that was in place before the accident and would sometimes be included in home cover or added as an optional extra.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...