Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
    • No need to worry about Rwanda Just give all the illegals one way trip to Northern Ireland then they can wander off into the EU through your beloved open border.     Job Done 😂🤣  
    • despite the evidence mounting against Chrichton, Vennells wrote in a meeting note that Crichton 'was possibly more loyal to her professional conduct requirements' "Vennells said Crichton was upset that the Post Office had ruined her reputation and compromised her by undertaking a further review of the Second Sight handling. Crichton was said to be ‘very emotional’ and her ‘ego and self-esteem have been undermined’."   That it seems all about their own interests - says a lot about both Chrichton and Vennels views on 'professional conduct requirements' eh?   Former Post Office chief executive Paula Vennells complained that general counsel put her integrity 'above interests of business' | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK Susan Crichton was left waiting outside board meeting to discuss damaging forensic accountant's report, inquiry hears.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

diskmandave vs aqua card - MCOL action - ** Settled/Cheque Banked **


diskmandave
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3738 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Dave

 

Should be (an option), once checked it applies the text for you. I filed 2 last week and it was working then.

I don't believe your detailed poc will be accepted as the claimant acknowledged the stated case as served.

 

Perhaps use your detailed parts in reply to defence as and when served.

 

CPR10.3 for reference, can't imagine it made the mistake of ack service absent particulars.

http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part10

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

May be best to hold fire Dave, it will file its defence and from that you'll be able to see what it intends to rely on. You only have one opportunity to reply so it would seem sensible to wait until you have sight of its case. Your reply may provide you with an opportunity to dispose of any issues and perhaps afford you a little leverage.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Update to this, is that there is no update. MCOL is showing as "DEFENCE", which was due last

Saturday, but I've had NOTHING from either the court, DLA Piper, or SAV credit Ltd..

 

So, my letter writing head is going to be active later, I assume that anything I send to DLA-P needs to be copied to the court??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leave it till after xmas. Post might be delayed.

  • Haha 1

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep... I absolutely agree m8..

But my point is that they are required to serve these documents on time, and living in the age we

do, there's no reason why they couldn't have been sent to me by email or guarenteed/signed delivery.

 

I dare say they would be crowing from the treetops should I miss a deadline.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres no reason why they cant send it like that, but thetes no obligation for them to do it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep... I absolutely agree m8..

But my point is that they are required to serve these documents on time, and living in the age we

do, there's no reason why they couldn't have been sent to me by email or guarenteed/signed delivery.

 

I dare say they would be crowing from the treetops should I miss a deadline.

 

File only Dave, the court serves the defence. Give it a couple of weeks to allow for the hols

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dave

 

Not really necessary to write unless you feel the need to remind it that you have an option to reply.

 

You can file and serve reply together with DQ, my thoughts would be not to jump the gun though. Wait on service before replying, no brownie points for going in too soon mate.

 

Enjoy your crimbo holiday and wait on service in the new year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave, opening hours for MCOL....... have a few cases on going at the mo hence the email correspondence

 

 

 

 

 

Please note our office will be closing at 4pm on 24th December and will re open on Monday 30th

 

 

 

We will also be closing at 4pm on 31st December and will re open on 2nd January

 

 

 

 

 

Thank you for emailing the Money Claim Online (MCOL) Email Account.

 

 

 

When you send an email to the Court and your email requires a reply, we will;

 

 

 

Dispatch a reply to your email usually within 5 but not later than 10 working days of receipt.

 

 

 

(please do not re-send duplicate messages)

 

 

 

 

 

A comprehensive user guide for Money Claim Online (MCOL) is available on request from the following link

 

 

 

mcol@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

 

 

 

Please copy the following text into the subject heading and a copy of the guide will be emailed by return.

 

 

 

Money Claim Online (MCOL) User Guide Request

 

 

 

 

 

If you have visited the GOV.uk website in relation to Money Claim OnLine and would like to leave feedback regarding the usefulness of the content and guidance on the GOV.uk website, please follow the link:

 

 

 

https://www.gov.uk/feedback/contact

 

 

 

 

 

MCOL is a separate entity to other Government departments and therefore we can only deal with MCOL queries. We do not deal with Family, probatelink3.gif or Bankruptcy matters.

 

 

 

Please note that the office will be closed on the following Public & Privilege Bank holidayslink3.gif:

 

 

 

Wednesday 25th December 2013 Christmas Day

 

 

 

Thursday 26th December Boxing Day

 

 

 

Friday 27th December

 

 

 

Wednesday 1st January 2014 New Years Day

 

 

 

Guidance is accessible online 24 hours a day on the Direct Gov Website http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/ManagingDebt/Makingacourtclaimformoney/DG_195688

 

 

 

Court staff are not legally trained. If your query is in relation to whether you have a valid claim, we will be unable to comment on this matter. You may wish to seek professional legal advice from a Solicitor, Legal Executive or Citizens Advice Bureau.

 

 

 

This message is automatically generated; please do not reply to this message.

 

 

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave

 

 

Sorry mate, just been advised that the site is more interested in DCA involvement so not able to assist in the new year as this goes against the grain for me.

 

 

Your case should be fairly straightforward, Andy or steampowered have always seemed reasonable lads and will assist you in the future.

 

 

Best regards

 

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

mike it is not.

 

i'd be the first to scream otherwise.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

mike you are barking up the wrong tree

 

trust me.

 

PM if you wish.

 

not in the open forum for tonight please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got two letters today, one from the court and one from DLA-Piper LLC.

Both have very different dates on them, so I can only assume that they've been

sat in an understaffed Post Office sorting office until now....

 

I also see that a forum arguement is upon us, and Im probably going to have to do this on my own now....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your not on your own Dave Im subbed.

 

 

Regards

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

My initial thought is to respond directly to DLA, including the Detailed claim that I already have, as they seem to

indicate that they want it?? And to copy that to the court.... And to get the N180 off by Special Delivery, what's the fee with

the N180 is it £40 ?

 

I do notice too that they've invited me to discontinue with a promise of no costs, what do you guys think ??

Edited by diskmandave
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...