Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Benefit caps - but is there a minimum?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3930 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have previously posted about a situation regarding a friend of mine. Husband on ESA (Assessment Phase) awaiting tribunal hearing. She has recently closed her business. She tried to sign on Jobseeker's but was told she would be added to her Husband's claim. It could well be she didn't have the relevant contributions as she paid Class 2 and Class 4. It is now some eight weeks since the DWP were informed about this but they are still only receiving her Husband's £71.70 a week ESA. Their only other income is approximately £62/£63 a week private pension. They have no savings.

 

Can someone please advise is income of approximately £135.00 deemed enough to live on? They have applied for CTB but heard nothing back. They have returned all necessary forms. CT is £155.00 a month (12 months). They have a mortgage of in excess of £800 a month which is now in arrears as is their CT (both 1 month).

 

Her husband has been informed that it could be approximately 4 months before he hears about a Tribunal Hearing. I have tried to look at information for them and it would appear that he is entitled to Pension Credit from January 2014. That said, it looks like changes may effect this from October 2013 as my friend is younger than he is and it appears they may then go off the youngest age.

 

Sorry for rambling on - trying to help a friend in need.

 

Thank you for any advice.

 

VUB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thank you for the information

 

I mentioned the mortgage interest to her but she thought the scheme kicks in after three months is that correct? It is something that she needs to look into. Will they deduct anything from the £112.00 because of his private pension do you know?

 

Thank you.

 

VUB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, there is a 13 week delay before mortgage interest can be paid. The entire amount of a private pension is deducted from income related ESA.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thank you for that information. He is currently receiving £71.70 so basically would get £40 extra for his Wife to be added to the claim as a dependant - but then they would take £63.00 per week off that making him worse off for his pension. The mind boggles.

 

Thank you for your help.

 

VUB

Link to post
Share on other sites

He wouldn't be worse off, as the cont based part of his claim would not be affected by a £63 pension. This kind of situation is confusing, and I can do a more detailed explanation if you want. It could be tedious, though, so I'll only do it if you feel it would help - let me know.

 

The main benefit to making a joint claim for ESA(IR) would be entitlement to mortgage interest.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Antone for explaining.

 

My friend did speak with someone at a benefit advisory service yesterday and they advised her that they are entitled to £101.20 to include the mortgage interest. It has not been 13 weeks since she was added to his claim so I assume the mortgage interest part will not be added at this stage. So in essence if they take his pension from the £112.00 at this stage he will receive £49.00 as opposed to the £71.70 he was getting before she was added.

 

As regards mortgage interest - they have a mortgage payment protection insurance policy which has a waiting period of 60 days which she is in the process of claiming. This pays less than half of their contractual payment. I assume that as this amount should cover the interest only element that they will not be eligible for the mortgage interest part of the contribution based ESA claim. The council tax appears to reduce from approximately £155.00 to £92 per month. This is still a huge slice to find out of their income.

 

He is eligible for Pension Credit in January 2014 under the current legislation and it appears that they would receive more benefit then and pay no council tax at all.

 

This really is a minefield!

 

Thank you.

 

VUB

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...