Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank goodness it's not your roof and you get to foot the bill! How big are these bits of mortar? How often are they falling into your garden? Hourly, daily? Just go ahead with your plans, of course, they're not going to be worried by your time pressures and the urgency of the situation, so simply carry on as you would have done and I'm sure everything will go fine. Unless there is a danger to life and serious structural issues which mean you cannot venture into your garden, then IMHO there is little more you can do less for what you have done so already and made them aware of the issue.
    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Info from DWP re: appeal


Past caring
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3904 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My husband has been placed once again in WRAG group at renewal; however we were not notified of this decision until the JCP advisor rang, and she told us it was for 2 years this time. We requested all of the information held from DWP, upon reading through they state my husband was assessed at a medical - but he has never had one for ESA! Even the JCP lady thinks he should be in Support Group, she advised him to appeal and it was a real shock to see what has been written. So my question is, where do we go from here? Do I add this further information to his appeal or do I keep this back in case its needed at a tribunal?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Past caring:

 

'...... where do we go from here?'

 

It's not clear from what you've written what's happened so far. Is '...... all of the information held ......' their statement of reasons for the decision? Does it include an ESA85A report? Has your husband asked Jobcentreplus to 'look at their decision again', or made a formal written appeal via letter or a GL24 form?

 

CAG's guide to appeals should help you to understand the appeals procedure;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?251737-Appealing-or-going-to-a-Tribunal-Some-useful-information

 

Far from unusual for Atos/Jobcentreplus to find non existent face to face assessments and Med 3 (unfit) notes. They're very good at losing medical evidence as well. :roll:

 

If your husband hasn't already submitted a formal written appeal he can use the non existent face to face assessment to discredit Jobcentreplus evidence, and it should certainly be mentioned in a tribunal submission. But its more important to identify, and evidence, the support group criteria you believe he meets.

 

Sincerely, Margaret. :panda:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

My husband was again placed in the ESA WRAG group for a further 2 years. We have appealed this decison but today received a letter saying the original decision still stands as no further evidence was submitted and all details have now been passed to Tribunal. However the appeals letter we put in did contain other evidence and the reasons why we feel he should be in the Support Group. We know this was received as it was sent signed for delivery. But all of these details have been omitted from the details sent to the Tribunals and have not been taken into account when looking at the decision again. Whats my position now? I have no idea how I can get my husband to the tribunal as he wont answer the door or phone, let alone travel 90 miles to a tribunal in front of strangers. Can anyone make any suggestions as to my next move please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From my understanding of the process what will happen next is that HMCTS will send you (well your husband) a letter about the tribunal. This will possibly be about 2-3 weeks after the DWP have passed your appeal onto them. Part of this letter from HMCTS will include a form for you to return, and part of this form is whether you want to attend the tribunal in person to present your case, or let it consider the evidence on paper. Since you say you will not be able to get your husband to travel to the tribunal you would indicate on the form that you want them to consider the evidence on paper, and submit with it your complete summary of the case.

 

(And yes, the DWP do seem to be quite capable of ignoring other evidence contained in your appeal letter to them, and stating in their evidence to the tribunal that there wasn't any.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

When the DWP say no new evidence has been submitted, they mean 'new' as is nothing they didn't know from the ESA50 and the important bit is they don't feel they should change their minds so not to worry about that. You can send in your additional evidence to the Tribunal service when you submit your stuff to them. You can either submit your appeal on paper only, the statistics show that very few people succeed that way though so that is not recommended or your husband could give his permission for you to attend on his behalf which at least means the panel can ask you questions and you can answer (I've gone to a tribunal on someone else's behalf before and that appeal was allowed) or your husband could go with you supporting him. If he goes, that gives the best chance of success, statistics show, as the panel can hear from him how he is affected by his illness or disability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My husband was again placed in the ESA WRAG group for a further 2 years. We have appealed this decison but today received a letter saying the original decision still stands as no further evidence was submitted and all details have now been passed to Tribunal. However the appeals letter we put in did contain other evidence and the reasons why we feel he should be in the Support Group. We know this was received as it was sent signed for delivery. But all of these details have been omitted from the details sent to the Tribunals and have not been taken into account when looking at the decision again. Whats my position now? I have no idea how I can get my husband to the tribunal as he wont answer the door or phone, let alone travel 90 miles to a tribunal in front of strangers. Can anyone make any suggestions as to my next move please.
Your asked the same back in August 2013 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?400881-Info-from-DWP-re-appeal

 

+ http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?391505-contribs-based-ESA-ended

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the evidence yourself to the Tribunal Service, and if you are going the route of a paper appeal, make sure you prepare a thorough submission, with evidence on how your husband meets both WRAG and the appropriate support group descriptor, exemption, or reg 29/35.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Past caring:

 

:frusty: Somewhere between the Tatos mail addresses and the decision makers' in trays there's a gynormous black hole that swallows up all the supportive evidence we attach to ESA50s and GL24s. Then Mr Hoban and Ms McVey bleat (there's no other word for it) that claimants withhold evidence until the tribunal stage!!! For which the translation's; sub-standard assessments (even by Tatos standards, with or without a face to face), rubber stamped by decision makers, and they'll leave the Tribunals Service to sort the fall out!!! This time last year a friend of mine had a partially upheld complaint against Tatos but Jobcentreplus still wouldn't revise.

 

www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?251737-Appealing-or-going-to-a-Tribunal-Some-useful-Information

 

The above link is CAG's guide to appeals. Pages 10 - 12 and 25 - 27 of the 6th link in #1, outline the criteria for an award of employment n support allowance with the support component.

 

To prepare a written submission to the tribunal head up blank sheets of A4/word docs with each descriptor you and your husband believe he meets, then write paragraphs to explain why, with reference to your extra supportive evidence. :honeybee13:'s template was written to rebutt an ESA85 (usually more detailed than an 85A) but it's still got useful suggestions for how to word a submission.

 

Sincerely, Margaret. :panda:

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...