Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have never heard of any such law. Please post a link to what you have read online that explains this law. And please confirm whether you were ever married to or in a formal Civil Partnership with your Ex.
    • Today has been hectic so  have been unable to complete the whole thing. If you now understand it and want to go ahead with a complaint to the IPC, fine. If not then I won't need to finish it. But below is my response to your request  on post 64. No you don't seem stupid, the Protection of Freedoms Act isn't easy to get one 's head around at first. The part of the above Act referring to private parking is contained within Schedule 4 which you can find online under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Section 9 of SCH.4 relates to how the parking scrotes have to perform so that they can transfer their right to pursue the keeper from the driver when the PCN is still unpaid after a certain amount of time. In your case the PCN was posted to you the keeper and arrived within 14 days from when they claimed a breach occurred. That means they complied with first part of the Act. The driver at that time was still responsible to pay the charge demanded on the PCN and PCM now have to wait for 28 days to elapse before they can write and advise the keeper that as the charge has not been paid, that they now have the right to pursue the keeper. They claim they sent the first PCN on the 13th March, five days after the alleged breach and it arrived on Friday 15th March. So to comply with the Act they have to observe Section 8 subsection 2f   (f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given— (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So the first PCN was deemed to arrive on the 15th March and for 28 days to have elapsed is when the time is right for them to write and say you are now liable as keeper. So they sent the next PCN on the 12th April which is too early as you could still have paid until midnight of the 12th. So the earliest their second PCN should have gone to you was  Saturday 13th April so more likely on Monday 15th April. The IPC Code of Conduct states "Operators must be aware of their legal obligations and implement the relevant legislation and guidance when operating their businesses." So by issuing your demand a day early, they have broken the Act, the IPC Code of Conduct, the DVLA agreement  to abide by the law and the Code of Conduct not to mention a possible breach of your GDPR .   I asked the IPC  in the letter on an earlier to confirm that  CPMs Notice misrepresenting the law was a standard practice for all of PCMs Notices or just certain ones. Their distribution  may depend on when they were issued and whether they were issued in certain localities or for certain breaches. Whichever method used is a serious breach of the Law and could lead to PCM being black listed by the DVLA . One would expect that after that even if the IPC did not cancel your ticket, PCM could not risk going to Court with you nor even pursuing you any further.
    • thanks jk2054 - do you know any law i can quote (regarding timeframe) when sending the email as if i cant they'll probably just say no like the normal staff have done? thanks.
    • I lived there with her up until I gave notice. She took over the tenancy in her name. I had a letter from the council and a refund of the council tax for 1 month.    She took on the bills and tenancy and only paid the rent. No utility bills or council tax were paid once she took it over. She will continue to not pay bills in her new house which I'm now having to pay or will have to. I have looked online I believe the police and solicitors are going by the partner law to make me liable.   I have always paid my bills and ensured her half was paid then see how much free money is over.   She spends all her money on payday loans and rubbish then panics about the rent. I usually end up paying it or having to get her a loan.   Stupidly in my name but at the time it was because she was my partner. I even paid to move her and clean and decorate her old house so she got the deposit back. It cost me £3000 due to the mess she always leaves behind.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unlawful Car Repo? MotoNovo


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3887 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've been busy reading another thread which is mentioned a few threads above which is basically the same situation and I understand they won damages for the agreement back in accordance with s92 of the CCA 1974.

 

Any idea as to the level of damages? I'm really interested!

 

The big issue here, though, is *if* more than 1/3 has been paid - and the goods have been snatched back then the OP would be entitled to a refund of all of their payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Do my above calculations make sense to you though? As in over a 1/3 has been paid?

 

I'm still reading through the thread I referred to so I will come back but I've seen others that got back all of their payments......

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

certainly will and market value of the car

 

not go my brain on to workout your figures at present

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

certainly will and market value of the car

 

not go my brain on to workout your figures at present

 

dx

 

Thanks.

 

That's ok, have a ponder at your leisure.

 

Oli

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Orfoster,

 

OK looking at your statement:

 

5995 + 2276.08 + 199 = 8470.08

Total due = 8619.08

Diff = 149 (option to buy???)

 

14NOV09 5995 + 2276.08 + 199 + 129.57(option to buy?????) = 8599.65

Diff from total due = 19.43 (for what??????)

 

8599.65 1/3 = 2866.55

8619.08 1/3 = 2873.03

 

So your opening balance was 8599.65 therefore 1/3 should be 2866.55

You paid 176.46 * 14 + 188.46 = 2658.90

Diff to 1/3 = 207.65 (in Moto favor)

 

Total charges to be reclaimed = 12 + 12 + 35 + 35 = 94

Option to purchase fee = 129.57

Total = 223.57

 

So by removing the fees you have IMHO overpaid the 1/3 by 15.92, going by the account opening balance at 14NOV

 

Conversely if we use the 8619.08 1/3 = 2873.03 (1/3) - 94 (charges) - 129.57 (option fee) = 2649.46 - 2659.90 (you actually paid) then you are over the 1/3 by 10.44

 

Were your repayments 176.46 for the duration, i.e 49 months, because this equates to 8646.54 PAID in total

 

Not sure what the 1010 entry on 16Aug is for - did you pay this?

 

I am not an expert but this is what I can gleam from that statement.

 

Irrespective of the 1/3 they took the car from private property which AFAIK is a big no,no without a court order

 

HTH

 

G

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Irrespective of the 1/3 they took the car from private property which AFAIK is a big no,no without a court order

 

 

It's not really. The OP might be able to claim damages but they are likely to be reasonably nominal. The taking the car without a court order whilst it is a protected asset - that's the BIG thing here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't have a claim against them. Once you terminated, that was it. You cannot unilaterally change your mind. So you couldn't stop them taking the car, and they didn't need a court order. You possibly have a claim for breach of statutory duty for the taking from private land, but even if you do it's worth about a tenner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

In terms of reclaiming the charges applied to the whole thing.

They charged for;

1. Abort Fee

2. Default Fee

3. Collections Management Charge

4. £300 for incomplete service history (it was there and I complained about this but they never responded, it was just a loose page).

 

Are the above reclaimable penalties?

 

If so they total £918 inc 8%

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes all of them

 

if they have charged you interest on them

ie the statements show interest every month as an entry

then charge them at THEIR RATE

 

use the CISHEET.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks,

 

On looking at their website they say they are regulated by the FCA but on checking the FCA register for some reason I can't find either FirstRand or MotoNovo by using their postcodes as listed on the bottom of the MotoNovo website.

 

If they say they are regulated should I claim breach of contract in accordance with COBS?

 

Where do I serve N1? Their registered office at FirstRand or MotoNovo (Trading arm)?

 

Cheers

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok so a letter was sent to reclaim the charges but we have had a response from MotoNovo saying that the charges were never paid........have a look [ATTACH=CONFIG]46208[/ATTACH]

 

They're saying that they weren't paid but the 50% was paid and obviously included those charges, they make reference to offering a reduction in the debt if it was paid within 14 days but I wasn't able to do this....!

 

The issue around the service book charge (a letter was sent in and they failed to check as the service book document was just loose within the folder) and the abort fee is just another charge in our view.

 

Can I just check that the charges are reclaimable??

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

reading now

 

back later bit buzy

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

notes:

 

Basically, want the default removed from credit file and account marked as settled

..you've now got that..

 

outstanding...

The taking the car without a court order whilst it is a protected asset - that's the BIG thing here.

where are we on this?

have you directly accused them of this yet?

 

on the charges ....

he is talking as if the charges were a 'notianal'

i'e you didn't complete the agreement, so the full bal was not paid?

 

where do they sit on the fact of the £700 to equidebt then?

it does not show on the statements?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx,

 

Basically, want the default removed from credit file and account marked as settled

..you've now got that..

Have we? That was what we were confused about TBH it talks about liability and doesn't mention removing adverse information.

 

The taking the car without a court order whilst it is a protected asset - that's the BIG thing here.

where are we on this?

have you directly accused them of this yet?

Yes and they've ignored me on each occasion about this, people are suggesting that damages for this would be negligible?

If you take off the charges etc then it seems as though we reached the 1/3rd but I assume we would have to firstly show the charges aren't right in order to then show the balance was over 1/3rd?

 

he is talking as if the charges were a 'notianal'

i'e you didn't complete the agreement, so the full bal was not paid?

 

where do they sit on the fact of the £700 to equidebt then?

it does not show on the statements?

Feeling a bit stupid about this bit....the charges were applied to the balance, payment was made to Equidebt they took a 40% reduction but really its the point that at the time of applying them they weren't right and that if we won this argument then its over 1/3rd.

 

What's the best course of action?

Do we accept their offer on the default issue in part settlement?

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

part settlement?

 

no i'd write back about the offer.

 

clarify if they are removing all negative data from your file

 

in other words to make myself clear...

 

I thank you for you letter dated dd/mm/yyyy and its contents.

 

I wish before accepting the offer for clarification on the follow points I am not clear about.

 

by stating you are prepared to removed my liability with regard to my credit file -

does this include the removal of the default & any late markers your have placed.

 

in other words for point of clarity, you will ensure that this debt will no longer harm my credit worthiness?

 

you mention nowhere, as far as I can see, a payment of £700 I made to equidebt dated dd/mm/yyyy

[bearing in mind this was a discount from £xxxxx]

 

I know in the whole sceme of things this mens very little to you

but it concerns me that nowhere does your paperwork say athying regarding this money?

 

where did it go? if not off my debt

can you please indicate whom I have to rise a complaint too about this.

 

it was paid in good faith and it appears to me I have been fleeced.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

MotoNovo have replied;

 

Thank you for your email. Apologies for the delay in replying, but I needed to check some details with our Collections Department.

 

Firstly, the amendment to your credit file would be a repair which would include the removal of liability and a removal of late markers from your file from the date of your voluntary termination.

Secondly, referring to the situation with Equidebt, unfortunately, Equidebt have gone into liquidation and never passed any funds to us, hence no mention of them on your agreement account.

 

Please let me know if you wish me to process the amends and I will arrange for the data amends to be made.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So because MotoNovo don't reflect this payment on my account what can I do?

We've accepted their £200 and removal of all adverse info as settlement in just that matter, charges and unlawful repo IMO are still outstanding if we can pursue.

 

Surely them saying it wasn't all paid isn't my problem, not my problem that the debt collectors went bust?

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Account was settled in full with Equidebt on 12 July 2012, they didn't go into administration until 13 June 2013, are they seriously suggesting MotoNovo received no payment nearly 12 months later?!

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...