RLP Allegations No Evidence and no Names on RLP letters

[baioto]

Dear Sirs,

 

I have bought on Beging of year By TK MAxx few items and one was store reduced price,

I Paid for all my purchases and after that was ask to follow security guard.

 

I have been Accused of Changing Labels on 20 Jan By TK MAxx and have been forced to sign form that I will never visit any TK Maxx store .

 

Actually I have not did what I was accused, I have been lead to Security room when Security Guards Said That they have CCTV record ,and if not sign form will call police,

 

They refused to Show me CCTV record and said Company called RLP will provide all evidence.

 

Since then I have received 5 Letters from RLP threatening me With Civil Court and Unreasonal demand for 147.50 for loses and administration

and Security people time The goods they claim for change label was taken back as they say for "EVIDENCE" and I was refunded.

 

RLP are demand money quote Protocol for pre action Civil Procedure 1998 Act Portocol

 

But When I ask them in compliance with Same protocol to clearly to Explain case and provide all evidence what they will relay in court

they said that they have Eye witness

 

Which statement had not been sent in Demanded by Me 21 Days and No CCTV record.

 

All letters are without name and different signatures.

 

I demanded also to Disclose name of persons writing letters to be able to check with RLP management if Such person exist

 

Any this my demand was not respected As well.

AND replied they that due to fail to comply with Protocol case is closed

and I deny Any liability to RLP and their client

 

Previous letter they said that will reduce amount to GBP 95.00.

 

Last Letter they said due to lack of defense if not replay in 14 days they will contact and will pass my Debt to Debt collectors company.

 

They Said

Quote

Whilst there is no legal obligation to consider mitigating circumstances in civil proceedings our client operates civil recovery within a set of core principles which initialy agreed with ACPO and have been developed further since then to ensure further protection of those who may be considered vulnerable.

If we do not hear from You within next 14 days , with reasonable settlement proposal, or with any information relevant to this matter, it will either be discussed or passed to specialist company which recovers debts and undisputed claim for damages

Unquote

MY QUESTION

 

1.What to reply to them?

2.Is It legal without provided any evidence to pass Personal Data to Debt Collector?

3.Is it Legal to Send letter without Name and only Signature?

4.If they fail to provide evidence in 21 Day after my demand is it legal to pass this to civil court

5.In which case is possible some one to pass personal data to Debt Collector company

6.Can I claim bulling against RLP and to whom

7.Can you give me all legal act what are in violation by RLP

8.How legally can stop them from sending bulling messages

 

If You have ssen some letter before from RLP does it have some names or only sigantures

Thanks

[dx100uk]

simple answer is to TOTALLY IGNORE THEM

 

 

they are NOT THE LAW

 

they are NOT THE COURT

 

they ARE NOT THE POLICE.

 

they have NO LEGAL POWERS WHATSOEVER

 

just produce pages of rubbish to try and SPOOF people into paying up

 

it is NOT A FINE

 

its a SPECULATIVE INVOICE.

 

dx

[2Grumpy]

and RLP are not able to take you to court even though they are quoting CPR requirements etc

[renegadeimp]

The simple answer you need is to ignore them.

[renegadeimp]

and RLP are not able to take you to court even though they are quoting CPR requirements etc

 

Hasnt stopped them doing so before, but since the Oxford case, Court action is almost non existant. jackie seems to prefer getting DCA's involved.

[ScarletPimpernel]

Hasnt stopped them doing so before, but since the Oxford case, Court action is almost non existant. jackie seems to prefer getting DCA's involved.

 

It's really important to be aware that RLP have never, ever taken anyone to court in connection with one of their speculative invoices, and nor will they, ever - no matter how much they'd like to, and how much they give the misleading impression that they can.

 

Only the retailer can bring a court claim, and they do it very, very rarely. So rarely, indeed, that one has to wonder if they take any notice of RLP at all.

 

RLP's business model is based entirely on people being scared and bullied into paying money they do not owe, using what the Law Commission called 'aggressive and misleading practices'.

[renegadeimp]

The problem is RLP will convince the retailer that there is a genuine claim, although that will be much harder due to the previous mentioned case.

[ScarletPimpernel]

The problem is RLP will convince the retailer that there is a genuine claim, although that will be much harder due to the previous mentioned case.

 

Retailers aren't keen to get involved in litigation, for various reasons, loss of reputation being one. The Law Commission considered that civil recovery claims are legally on shaky ground in any case.

 

If RLP really did have any sway over retailers, the courts would be clogged up with claims; they don't, so they aren't.

[2Grumpy]

The threat "passed to specialist company which recovers debts and undisputed claim for damages" might lead a possibility of stopping them. If you have sent the one-line response then their claim is disputed. If they pass on your details then that could be a DPA violation. At the very least, a letter saying that you might be considering maybe taking legal action unless they pay the invoice that you send them

[renegadeimp]

The threat "passed to specialist company which recovers debts and undisputed claim for damages" might lead a possibility of stopping them. If you have sent the one-line response then their claim is disputed. If they pass on your details then that could be a DPA violation. At the very least, a letter saying that you might be considering maybe taking legal action unless they pay the invoice that you send them

 

By passing it to a dca, Rlp have broken the dpa and also oft/fca guidelines. They have unlawfully passed personal info to a third party when no debt exists.

[ScarletPimpernel]

I suspect that any DCA involved in trying to collect such non-existent debts will be in breach of the terms of its licence, though of course they will claim that they take RLP's instructions in good faith. Once they are aware that RLP is a speculative invoicer, though, they should exercise due diligence.

[renegadeimp]

Surely a DCA should check the integrity of an account first.

[ScarletPimpernel]

Surely a DCA should check the integrity of an account first.

 

Of course; but in DCA land compliance means how much you can get away with, not doing the right thing.

[2Grumpy]

Given that you deny that the original incident took place and that you signed the forms etc under duress, you could consider contacting TK Maxx, informing them of that and demanding that they stop RLP from contacting you

 

I think that you would need a lot more advice first though!