Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HMRC, Fredrickson International Ltd


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4092 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks,

 

Hope as always someone can help me from this great site.

About 3 years ago my girlfriend was contacted by the HMRC and told she was overpaid tax credits and she needed to repay, she ignored them out of anger as she thought it their fault and was hit with a lump sum demand out of the blue. She's told me that she hasn't heard anything else until 3 weeks ago when they demanded repayment again, again she ignored them, but last week she got a letter from Fredrickson International, of which the contents are below :-

 

Dear Mrs xxxxx,

 

We have been instructed by HMRC who has passed this account to us for collection. We are appointed as their agent to act in this matter and you should now make sure you contact us in connection with the payment of this debt.

 

If you are experiencing financial difficulties which are preventing you from settling this debt, you must tell us now to avoid further recovery action. We will work with you to find a method of repayment that suits your circumstances.

 

Detailed below are up to 20 of the most recent items.

 

Payment reference no. Date Tax year due Amount

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 05/04/2010 2010 1235.20

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 27/07/2010 2010 101.86

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 27/07/2010 2010 136.44

Total 1473.50

 

If you recently made a payment or need help in understanding how this figure is calculated please contact us. Alternatively you will find links to websites which you may find helpful overleaf.

 

YOU MUST CONTACT US IMMEDIATELY ON 0845 0349812 AND THE PAY THE BALANCE IN FULL.

 

Payment should be made to Fredrickson International Ltd and can be made by credit card, which will attract a 1.4% administration fee,or you can pay free of charge by debit card.

 

Yours Sincerely

Fredrickson International Ltd.

 

 

 

Anyway, two things came to my mind, why would a powerful organisation like HMRC pass this debt to a DCA like Fredrickson, and can they enforce the debt repayment????

Again with these people it seems they are slow to payout, but woe betide you if you are overpaid.

Is there a letter template i can fire off to this DCA, does anyone feel???

 

Finally Fredrickson's grammar leaves a lot to be desired, plus they got my girlfriends NI number wrong, which is the payment reference number as above.

Any replies/help/advice would be most appreciated, i'm off to work now but back online later.

 

Regards

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I do believe that HMRC do farm out their debts to DCA's. There is nothing to force your g/f to deal with Freds and she could just contact HMRC to find out how she can have her case reviewed. Perhaps all she needs to do is submit a dispute to HMRC about this overpayment and to just advise Freds that she had raised a dispute with HMRC which is ongoing. Always best to send recorded and to keep copies of letters. While any debt is in dispute, no further action should be taken to enforce the debt. BUT you do have to get the dispute made, otherwise court enforcement action may well follow.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aaah cheers uncle, is there a letter template i could follow in regards to raising a dispute with HMRC?

I find it incredible that she hadn't heard anything for about 3 years, and the thing is i wouldn't call it a debt as it's there fault for overpaying, then they have the cheek to ask for it back all in one go, when they know in her position it is unlikely.

I'm sure if boot was on the other foot, the old clique 'possession is nine tenths of the law' would come into effect in so many words.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers batman, had a quick glance at it, am i reading it right that it only applies to Income and Capital Gains Tax? Will have a more detailed look when i get home.

Do you mind me asking what your wife owed for?

Can you give me ideas of letters/templates and the type of content, etc...?

Private message me if you want to keep it more discreet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...